Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 4-Jul-08, at 3:14 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Here's some tips for folks trying to debug Maven/Plexus/Plugins in Eclipse. Using m2e you can actually debug/execute plugin _inside_ Eclipse. That means the plugin executes from the workspace in-situ. Extremely handy.

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
On 05/07/2008, at 2:17 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: As part of getting adequate coverage for vetting, I have just asked Nigel and Justin who watch over the Hudson instance here at Apache to setup the Maven jobs we require for validation. They are running on Solaris which will be a good

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
We'll get a Solaris VM running at Contegix but I'll try it when Nigel gives me access. The Hadoop stuff seems to be running all the time and it takes over an hour so our ITs would probably kill the machine. On 6-Jul-08, at 9:33 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 05/07/2008, at 2:17 AM, Jason van

Re: Developing Maven 2.1

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
On 06/07/2008, at 3:56 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I am also working with the Apache Infrastructure team to integrate the Contegix folks who are the ones who currently host all the hardware we're using. Maven's central repository, our Hudson instance, and our Nexus instance. So, in short

Re: Developing Maven 2.1

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 6-Jul-08, at 10:08 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 06/07/2008, at 3:56 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I am also working with the Apache Infrastructure team to integrate the Contegix folks who are the ones who currently host all the hardware we're using. Maven's central repository, our Hudson

Re: svn commit: r674307 - /maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/core-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/integrationtests/MavenIT0081Test.java

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
You may also just want to try and clean that test up: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/IT+Problems it0081 is listed in there. On 6-Jul-08, at 11:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brett Date: Sun Jul 6 08:20:18 2008 New Revision: 674307 URL:

release:prepare and release:perform in one shot ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-100)

2008-07-06 Thread Dan Tran
Is there anyone working on this? I am thinking of implementing release:release mojo which extends release:prepare and add release:perform's params to its arguments there will be cut/paste code from release:perform mojo. Thoughs? -D

Re: release:prepare and release:perform in one shot ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-100)

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
You can just batch them together. We have an example setup in our Hudson: mvn -B -U -e -Prelease,stage -Dmaven.repo.local=/home/j2ee-hudson/ repos/${JOB_NAME} clean release:prepare release:perform -Darguments=-X On 6-Jul-08, at 12:01 PM, Dan Tran wrote: Is there anyone working on this? I

Re: release:prepare and release:perform in one shot ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-100)

2008-07-06 Thread Dan Tran
Ah, that is very simple Thanks -D On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can just batch them together. We have an example setup in our Hudson: mvn -B -U -e -Prelease,stage -Dmaven.repo.local=/home/j2ee-hudson/repos/${JOB_NAME} clean release:prepare

Re: svn commit: r674310 - /maven/components/trunk/pom.xml

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
Ew. :) I agree with wanting to centralise the versions, but this seems like a stopgap for a less verbose POM and some sort of grouping (ie, allowing a short burst of versions in the dependencyManagement only). Am I understanding correctly that this is just cosmetic - or is there a

Re: svn commit: r674310 - /maven/components/trunk/pom.xml

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 6-Jul-08, at 12:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Ew. :) I agree with wanting to centralise the versions, but this seems like a stopgap for a less verbose POM and some sort of grouping (ie, allowing a short burst of versions in the dependencyManagement only). Am I understanding correctly

Re: svn commit: r674310 - /maven/components/trunk/pom.xml

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
On 07/07/2008, at 2:42 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: As I stated in the issue, to be able to change the versions on the fly in the build system to use different versions. Pass in properties is far easier then trying to muck with the version in the depMan section. It will also allow the

Re: svn commit: r674310 - /maven/components/trunk/pom.xml

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 6-Jul-08, at 12:53 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 07/07/2008, at 2:42 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: As I stated in the issue, to be able to change the versions on the fly in the build system to use different versions. Pass in properties is far easier then trying to muck with the version in

Re: Maven ITs

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
Fine here, and on vmbuild too. digester being null happens after a transfer error of some sort - you might throw in -X to see if it shows something else occuring. The other curiosity is why it's resolved the project info reports plugin in both cases? Cheers, Brett On 07/07/2008, at 4:03

Re: MARTIFACT-25 was: releasing maven artifact 3.0 alpha 1

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
On 05/07/2008, at 1:51 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: John - are you looking into this? Need it resolved for MNG-3185 I've done it in the way John was suggesting - it's not the perfect solution but it's the best one available I think. I stumbled upon an API regression that breaks one of

Re: svn commit: r674307 - /maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/core-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/integrationtests/MavenIT0081Test.java

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
Yeah, I noticed that too. It's unrelated to the current problem (which seems to be fixed by doing the deletion), so I haven't changed it immediately - but if these stay stable I'll come back and change it to use an it-built artifact instead. - Brett On 07/07/2008, at 1:29 AM, Jason van

Re: Maven ITs

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 6-Jul-08, at 2:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Fine here, and on vmbuild too. digester being null happens after a transfer error of some sort - you might throw in -X to see if it shows something else occuring. After a transfer error it calls transferStarted( XX )? That seems wrong. The

Re: Maven ITs

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
On 07/07/2008, at 12:45 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 07/07/2008, at 5:15 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 6-Jul-08, at 2:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Fine here, and on vmbuild too. digester being null happens after a transfer error of some sort - you might throw in -X to see if it shows

MNG 624 and 3267

2008-07-06 Thread Ralph Goers
I've just run into the problem identified in these two issues (and in others). The suggestion in MNG-3267 proposes allowing the version (at a minimum) as a property. It then proposes that the version be resolved and the pom without properties be placed in the target directory. It then

Re: Hudson build is back to normal: Maven-2.1.x-ITs #172

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
There you go, we're back to normal in both Hudson and Continuum now. On 07/07/2008, at 2:15 PM, Hudson wrote: See http://ci.sonatype.org/job/Maven-2.1.x-ITs/172/changes -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

RE: Hudson build is back to normal: Maven-2.1.x-ITs #172

2008-07-06 Thread Brian E. Fox
Is it a full moon or something? ;-) Now that everything is building and passing Its...lets keep it that way. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 12:28 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Hudson build is back to normal: