Re: Build failed in Hudson: Maven-2.1.x-bootstrap » 1.4,osx #108

2009-02-25 Thread Brian Fox
No, 2.1 should be 1.5 so the job is wrong. --Brian (mobile) On Feb 25, 2009, at 2:32 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: Sorry, I keep forgetting we're still 1.4 minimum on here. It's just a test library - I can fix when I get back in a couple of hours. - Brett On 25/02/2009, at

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Maven-2.1.x-bootstrap » 1.4,osx #108

2009-02-25 Thread Brett Porter
On 25/02/2009, at 11:56 PM, Brian Fox wrote: No, 2.1 should be 1.5 so the job is wrong. I know we made that call, but nothing has used it yet, so I didn't want to change it just for a test case at this late stage :) - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org

Re: Synchronization issue with parallel downloads

2009-02-25 Thread Brett Porter
This is resolved now. On 24/02/2009, at 1:49 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Thanks for pointing this out. I'll take a closer look tomorrow. My initial thoughts: - we might need to double check if it occurs more often on windows due to timing variance (I expect that got much less testing than

Location of m2.conf

2009-02-25 Thread Torben S. Giesselmann
Heya -- is there a special reason that m2.conf is located in directory bin instead of conf? I find that a little confusing. Cheers, - Torben -- Torben S. Giesselmann tsg-sw...@foogoo.net A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory.

Re: refactoring Was: Alignment of maven 3.0 dependencies and Eclipse IP approved libraries

2009-02-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 24-Feb-09, at 5:53 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 25/02/2009, at 6:57 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: We actually don't know until the round of refactoring that's going to happen starting next week. Myself, Benjamin, John, Oleg, and Shane will be doing the lion's share of the refactoring in

Re: refactoring Was: Alignment of maven 3.0 dependencies and Eclipse IP approved libraries

2009-02-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 24-Feb-09, at 5:53 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 25/02/2009, at 6:57 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: We actually don't know until the round of refactoring that's going to happen starting next week. Myself, Benjamin, John, Oleg, and Shane will be doing the lion's share of the refactoring in

Re: refactoring Was: Alignment of maven 3.0 dependencies and Eclipse IP approved libraries

2009-02-25 Thread Jesse McConnell
We actually don't know until the round of refactoring that's going to happen starting next week. Myself, Benjamin, John, Oleg, and Shane will be doing the lion's share of the refactoring in the project builder, plugin manager, lifecycle executor and the repository system so we don't know what

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.0

2009-02-25 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11624styleName=Htmlversion=14835 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11624status=1 Staging repo:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

2009-02-25 Thread Dennis Lundberg
There has been no votes against this proposal, so I will go ahead and add bugtraq properties to SVN for the projects I work on. If someone wants this for a project and doesn't know how to set it up, please contact me and I'll give a helping hand. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi I would like to

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.0

2009-02-25 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 -- Olivier 2009/2/25 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org: +1 Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11624styleName=Htmlversion=14835 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.0

2009-02-25 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le mardi 24 février 2009, Dennis Lundberg a écrit : Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11624styleName= Htmlversion=14835 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: Location of m2.conf

2009-02-25 Thread Brett Porter
I think it's to indicate that the user shouldn't muck around with it, where they should feel free to muck around with conf/ :) On 26/02/2009, at 4:21 AM, Torben S. Giesselmann wrote: Heya -- is there a special reason that m2.conf is located in directory bin instead of conf? I find that a

RE: [vote] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2009-02-25 Thread Brian E. Fox
Results: Binding: +7 Brian, Jason, Arnaud, Lukas, Vincent, Olivier, Brett Non binding: +3 Jason Dillon, Oleg, Nicolas I'll publish the sites and artifacts now. -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu] Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 10:20 PM To: Maven

[ANN] Maven Enforcer Plugin 1.0-beta-1

2009-02-25 Thread Brian Fox
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Enforcer Plugin, version 1.0-beta-1 The Enforcer plugin is used to fail a build if certain constraints are not met. There are too many standard rules to describe here, but check out the site for more details:

Re: refactoring Was: Alignment of maven 3.0 dependencies and Eclipse IP approved libraries

2009-02-25 Thread Brett Porter
On 26/02/2009, at 6:17 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 24-Feb-09, at 5:53 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 25/02/2009, at 6:57 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: We actually don't know until the round of refactoring that's going to happen starting next week. Myself, Benjamin, John, Oleg, and Shane will