what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
Olivier, is there something critical missing?
Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then it seemed quite good
to me.
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 20 avril 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit :
Ok thx.
I agree that we have a good tests
Hi,
2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff.
Olivier, is there something critical missing?
No except some spare time :-)
Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then
Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I just tried 3
the release build on one of my projects and got the following error
message:
[ERROR] The project
com.tsystems.icto.tom:tom-icto-dependencies:0.2.22-SNAPSHOT
provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency
of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no. so I would think it is an error on
your side
On 20 April 2010 08:11, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency
of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no. so I would think it is an error on
your side
You are right. After changing that the
On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff.
Olivier, is there something critical missing?
No except some spare time :-)
No.
It's 3.x prerequisite.
2010/4/20 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff.
Olivier, is
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Working here.
It's nice to see maven getting closer to the 3.0\o/
/Paul
Le lundi 19 avril 2010 19:50:28, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16
089
There are still a couple of issues left
+1
2010/4/19 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500status=1
+1
Tested using Maven 2.2.0
Many thanks to Hervé
Regards,
Raphaël
2010/4/18 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr
Hi,
We solved 27 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095version=14254
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Lets move to call the next one a final release or at least a beta. We
have too many alphas floating around
2010/4/20 Raphaël Piéroni raf...@apache.org:
+1
Tested using Maven 2.2.0
Many thanks to Hervé
Regards,
Raphaël
2010/4/18 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr
Hi,
We solved 27
Hi Milos,
I'm not sure if you did the plexus-compiler release in conjunction with this or
if that was someone else, but the checksums for it are incorrect (see users@
today for those using The 2.3 release).
Do you know what happened? If the JARs are correct maybe we can just fix the
checksums
+1 works well here.
On 4/19/10 1:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the checksums
became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform combo.
I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double checked
that there are gpg signatures, but assumed checksums are correct. They
15 matches
Mail list logo