Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Arnaud Héritier wrote: 3.0-benjamin (built yesterday) : 14M/2488M in 5:23.389s (It probably swapped a lot) Should be fixed now, would be cool if you could double-check when time allows. Benjamin - To unsubscribe,

Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-08-18 Thread Julia Antonova
I will be out of the office starting 18.08.2010 and will not return until 19.08.2010. I have no acces to my mailbox, I will reply to your message upon return. For urgent issues please contact my colleagues: Sergey Khomyakov / Administration - serge...@tumlare.com Irina Pashina / Administration

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-08-18 Thread Stephen Connolly
can somebody update the wiki again... we really need a bot (not martin) to update julia's wki page On 18 August 2010 13:01, Julia Antonova juli...@tumlare.com wrote: I will be out of the office starting  18.08.2010 and will not return until 19.08.2010. I have no acces to my mailbox, I will

Mojo Complex Object From Pom

2010-08-18 Thread onlinegeek
I am trying to pass an object through my pom to my maven mojo. I have a class... public class Shortcut { /** * @parameter expression=${project} */ private String name; private String description; private String commandLine;

Re: Mojo Complex Object From Pom

2010-08-18 Thread Jeff MAURY
Your class MUST have an empty constructor !!! Regards Jeff MAURY On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:21 PM, onlinegeek onlinegeek...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to pass an object through my pom to my maven mojo. I have a class... public class Shortcut { /** * @parameter

Re: Mojo Complex Object From Pom

2010-08-18 Thread onlinegeek
Yous the man... You think it would mention that somewhere in the documentation lol. Thanks a bunch -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Mojo-Complex-Object-From-Pom-tp2639350p2639516.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Arnaud Héritier
It's always in GitHub or the merge started in trunk ? I'll try to build and test it this evening. Thx On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Arnaud Héritier wrote: 3.0-benjamin (built yesterday) : 14M/2488M in 5:23.389s (It probably swapped a lot) Should be fixed now,

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Arnaud Héritier wrote: It's always in GitHub or the merge started in trunk ? It's still in github. I'll try to build and test it this evening. Cool, thanks! Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.1

2010-08-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 from me On 2010-08-15 12:12, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 7 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150styleName=Htmlversion=16372 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.1

2010-08-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Vincent Siveton, Stéphane Nicoll, Emmanuel Venisse, Olivier Lamy, Dennis Lundberg +1 (non binding): Mark Struberg I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On 2010-08-15 12:12, Dennis Lundberg wrote:

[ANN] Maven WAR Plugin 2.1 Released

2010-08-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven WAR Plugin, version 2.1 The WAR Plugin is responsible for collecting all artifact dependencies, classes and resources of the web application and packaging them into a web application archive.

Should we start planning for v1.0.3?

2010-08-18 Thread Anders Hammar
There's a user asking for this. Should we decide for a time frame and try to fix what ever we manage within that period? I have one ongoing issue that I would like to spend some more time on. But I should be able to finish within a week or two. Should we say beginning of September? Also, should

Re: Should we start planning for v1.0.3? - Ignore this!

2010-08-18 Thread Anders Hammar
Please ignore my mail below. It was intended for the cargo dev list. So sorry, /Anders On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 20:28, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: There's a user asking for this. Should we decide for a time frame and try to fix what ever we manage within that period? I have one

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : It's always in GitHub or the merge started in trunk ? BTW, we have 3.0-beta-2 released without Guice nor Aether and GitHub with both Guice and Aether. What about merging Guice in svn trunk, so we can test the 3 major steps: 3.0- beta-2, +Guice,

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : It's always in GitHub or the merge started in trunk ? BTW, we have 3.0-beta-2 released without Guice nor Aether and GitHub with both Guice and Aether. What about merging Guice in svn

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Mark Derricutt
I'd love to offer more feedback on beta-2, but since it totally breaks our builds it's a non-starter. Without reworking our entire build setup ( which we're going to do anyway when we move to git ) M3 is effectively unusable for my main $work project. Which is a shame as all the new things look

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Hi, I just rebuilt aether and maven3 and I have now : 14M/125M We are really near of 9M/125M we have in beta2 Perfect !!! Let's go for a merge in trunk ?? Arnaud On Aug 7, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: Results I had yesterday were : 3.0-benjamin (built yesterday) :

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: There's been little to no feedback on beta-2 so I honestly don't think it matters. That's good news, isn't it? :-) -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Jason van Zyl a écrit : On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : It's always in GitHub or the merge started in trunk ? BTW, we have 3.0-beta-2 released without Guice nor Aether and GitHub with both

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Aug 18, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Jason van Zyl a écrit : On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : It's always in GitHub or the merge started in trunk ? BTW, we have 3.0-beta-2

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: Hi, I just rebuilt aether and maven3 and I have now : 14M/125M We are really near of 9M/125M we have in beta2 Perfect !!! Let's go for a merge in trunk ?? Yup, let's merge it all in and move forward. Arnaud On Aug 7, 2010,

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Jason van Zyl a écrit : On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: Hi, I just rebuilt aether and maven3 and I have now : 14M/125M We are really near of 9M/125M we have in beta2 Perfect !!! Let's go for a merge in trunk ?? Yup, let's merge

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Let's go for merge ! (with last spice version 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT or released version to have a fix for SPICE-34). Herve : regarding site plugin there is a patch here ( https://issues.sonatype.org/secure/attachment/23615/site-plugin-guice-eather.patch ). 2010/8/18 Hervé BOUTEMY

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Manfred Moser
Well.. can we get that patch applied and a new release of the maven 3 site plugin as well then. manfred PS: beta 2 works on all my projects.. Hi, Let's go for merge ! (with last spice version 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT or released version to have a fix for SPICE-34). Herve : regarding site plugin

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Olivier Lamy a écrit : Herve : regarding site plugin there is a patch here ( https://issues.sonatype.org/secure/attachment/23615/site-plugin-guice-eathe r.patch ). yes, I know the patch (I studied it since our last discussion), but that doesn't make the future maven

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Olivier Lamy
2010/8/18 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Olivier Lamy a écrit : Herve : regarding site plugin there is a patch here ( https://issues.sonatype.org/secure/attachment/23615/site-plugin-guice-eathe r.patch ). yes, I know the patch (I studied it since our last

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Olivier Lamy wrote: So maybe having a compatibility even if we are in a beta release process (benjamin ?) I don't feel motivated to maintain yet another layer of compat/bridge code for the sake of single beta plugin. Benjamin

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Olivier Lamy
2010/8/18 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu: Olivier Lamy wrote: So maybe having a compatibility even if we are in a beta release process (benjamin ?) I don't feel motivated to maintain yet another layer of compat/bridge code for the sake of single beta plugin. ok np for me.

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: I have only one concern with current maven-3 code in GitHub: it's not compatible with maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1 I think, that's a blocker for a new beta release, but not for a merge, isn't it? Jochen -- I Am

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mercredi 18 août 2010, Olivier Lamy a écrit : 2010/8/18 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu: Olivier Lamy wrote: So maybe having a compatibility even if we are in a beta release process (benjamin ?) I don't feel motivated to maintain yet another layer of compat/bridge code

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le jeudi 19 août 2010, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: I have only one concern with current maven-3 code in GitHub: it's not compatible with maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1 I think, that's a blocker for a new beta

Maven 3.0 and maven-metadata.xml download

2010-08-18 Thread Henrique Prange
Hi all, Not a show stopper, but Maven 3 tries to download the same maven-metadata.xml files every time and for every module. It doesn't cause any problems, but it increases the build time a lot. Cheers, Henrique - To

Re: Maven 3.0 and maven-metadata.xml download

2010-08-18 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Can you open an issue with some logs showing the issue and the version you are using We already published severals alpha and 2 beta Thx Arnaud On Aug 19, 2010, at 12:21 AM, Henrique Prange wrote: Hi all, Not a show stopper, but Maven 3 tries to download the same maven-metadata.xml files

Re: Maven 3.0 and maven-metadata.xml download

2010-08-18 Thread Henrique Prange
Hi Arnaud, One more information. I've added the missing version declaration for plug-ins and now Maven 3 don't try to download those files. I think this is just a side effect for not solving Maven 3 warnings. Should I still create an issue? Cheers, Henrique 2010/8/18 Arnaud Héritier

Re: guice memory usage was: (3.0 beta 2/3/4 roadmap was Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x)

2010-08-18 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 On 18 August 2010 22:02, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: Hi,  I just rebuilt aether and maven3 and I have now : 14M/125M  We are really near of 9M/125M we have in beta2  Perfect !!!  Let's go for a merge in trunk ??

Re: Maven 3.0 and maven-metadata.xml download

2010-08-18 Thread Stephen Connolly
Yes please do On 18 August 2010 23:47, Henrique Prange hpra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Arnaud, One more information. I've added the missing version declaration for plug-ins and now Maven 3 don't try to download those files. I think this is just a side effect for not solving Maven 3 warnings.

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-08-18 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: can somebody update the wiki again... we really need a bot (not martin) to update julia's wki page I extract the page from the FAQ into its own page

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-08-18 Thread Paul Benedict
Can anyone signup and update the wiki? I would like to use ISO date format for easy reading. Paul On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: can somebody update the wiki

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-08-18 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote: Can anyone signup and update the wiki? I would like to use ISO date format for easy reading. I think so, you have to ask for edit somehow. I have updated the dates as per your request and noted the steps of how to