Hi All,
The title says it all.
Any suggestions how to overcome this issue ?
Explanation below. Let the projects be:
‘parent’ : the parent pom of the ‘lib’ library just below
‘lib’ : the library
‘app’ : the application dependent on ‘lib’ through a version range.
(all three
true: I know it sounded familiar... :)
this artifact seems used by maven-remote-resources-plugin only
And if you look at the content, it contains a little helper to resolve
dependencies: we should probably deprecate it at the end
If there is no objection, I'll update code in a few days to
Am 2016-08-03 um 22:04 schrieb Jason van Zyl:
Using org.apache.maven.resolver instead org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver for
the package names is more consistent with the other naming in that document.
Maves sense, probably this project should be named
maven.a.o/artifact-resolver
Using org.apache.maven.resolver instead org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver for
the package names is more consistent with the other naming in that document.
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:30 PM, herve.bout...@free.fr wrote:
>
> true: I know it sounded familiar... :)
>
> this artifact seems used by
I'm surprised the transitive dependency to that parent succeeds, unless
it's ranged.
For the others, in order to determine the dependency tree, and thus any
transitive dependencies, and so on, the entire pom needs to be present. A
parent is part of that. If the parent is of a fixed version (all
It's really all about JARs...
"Java Artifact Repository Specification"
JARS
Happenstance.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
It's just a name - I know. Personally, I disagree with 'resolver'. It's
so much more. It also abstracts the transfers/transports etc. It is an
abstraction to manage and access a repository (whatever that may mean)
of artifacts (whatever that may mean) by employing a special directory
structure and
I proposed Maven Artifact Universe, but received no response.
Am 2016-08-03 um 23:32 schrieb Christian Schulte:
It's just a name - I know. Personally, I disagree with 'resolver'. It's
so much more. It also abstracts the transfers/transports etc. It is an
abstraction to manage and access a
Am 08/03/16 um 23:47 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> I proposed Maven Artifact Universe, but received no response.
Pretty close. In the Java universe we got used to talk about JSRs and
JEPs and things like that. I am all for something along "Maven Artifact
Repository Specification" and corresponding
Guys. Just because it fits perfectly the Java universe. "Java Artifact
Repository Specification".
JARS
Regards,
--
Christian
Am 04.08.2016 um 00:21 schrieb Christian Schulte:
Am 08/03/16 um 23:47 schrieb Michael Osipov:
I proposed Maven Artifact Universe, but received no response.
Pretty
I much prefer MARS, especially if you can come up with corresponding wordplay
for VENUS… ;-)
Seriously, the overlap with Java ARchive is bound to be confusing, and might
even make people think that the component has something to do with them.
Ralph
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Christian
11 matches
Mail list logo