I would create a jira issue with your tests as unit tests
then search for usages of createFromVersionSpec through the whole
maven and see how it's used
On 3/13/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm still having trouble with this. I wrote a sample class to show my
problem. The issue is
place them under src/site/resources ?
-D
On 3/13/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to include some images and xsd files into the generated Maven
site... but I can't figure out how to make the m-site-p include them.
Anyone know how to include extra files in the generate site?
In preparation to merge maven-dependency-analyzer-plugin with
maven-dependency-analzyer, we need to get the shared component out of
the sandbox. What is the process? Should I move it out of the sandbox in
svn, then stage a release and call a vote, or do we need a vote prior to
moving out of the san
I want to include some images and xsd files into the generated Maven
site... but I can't figure out how to make the m-site-p include them.
Anyone know how to include extra files in the generate site?
--jason
-
To unsubscribe,
I'm still having trouble with this. I wrote a sample class to show my
problem. The issue is that all the contains calls are correct except
that a singular version ie "2.0.5" always returns true. Is this an
artifact bug, or am I doing something wrong? According to the javadoc
for the method (shown i
On 3/12/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this going to result in a copy of all the artifacts with added
bundled metadata?
Will the structure will be same? Just wondering if the bundles should
just be included in the main repository with a classifier.
this is going to be a "beta"
Jason van Zyl napisał(a):
On 13 Mar 07, at 4:10 AM 13 Mar 07, Piotr Tabor wrote:
Hello,
I would like to join the Maven team and help you fixing bugs in the
project.
Lots of people submit patches. Generally if you have shown a sustained
effort over a period of time one of us will recognize
It processes all jar artifacts contained in a repo.
So if the repo it points to contains the whole maven repo, it will do
the whole thing.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
there's already a bundleall goal in the felix bundle plugin that will
generate osgi bundles for each dependency in the tree
https:/
A late addition.
I just commited a start of doco. which could be seen at
http://mojo.codehaus.org/maven-archetypeng/
Raphael
Answers inlined.
Raphaël
2007/3/13, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 12/03/2007, at 3:36 AM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
> Is backward compatibility for archetype only the recognition of the
> old
> descriptor and pathes resolution ?
yes, if you generate from an old archetype you get the sam
I'm not sure how much I can do in the next two weeks as we are
finishing a release and I'm on vacation the last week of March. I
will discuss with Patrick tomorrow whether he can provide some help in
brainstorming the best solution to the issue and setting up Continuum
here locally for testing pu
On 12/03/2007, at 3:36 AM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
Is backward compatibility for archetype only the recognition of the
old
descriptor and pathes resolution ?
yes, if you generate from an old archetype you get the same thing as
if you create now.
The selection step of the proposition can
there's already a bundleall goal in the felix bundle plugin that will
generate osgi bundles for each dependency in the tree
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-199
are you processing the whole repo or just a tree of dependencies
On 3/13/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Carloz
old database?
On 3/13/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just started up a newly-built instance of Continuum and am getting the
following error on startup.
Environment: JBoss 4.0.5
Continuum checked out from source with the patches from CONTINUUM-1167 and
CONTINUUM-961.
JBoss log
yes, and I setup the bundled for m2 and got them into place about an
hour ago...will be synced into the main repos sometime soon
jesse
On 3/13/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did JPOX 1.1.7 get released yesterday?
On 3/7/07, Erik Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FYI, JPOX 1.
Yes, see
http://www.jpox.org/servlet/forum/viewthread?thread=4179
Quoting Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Did JPOX 1.1.7 get released yesterday?
>
> On 3/7/07, Erik Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > FYI, JPOX 1.1.7 will be released next monday. It fixes the issue with
> > postgres.
Hi Carloz,
Just in case you need a mojo to process the repository,
I'm almost done with this RPM Factory mojo.
I'm going to use it to RPM the maven repository, but
with a little modification, it could be used to create and add
manifests to all the jars in the maven repository as well.
I'll prob
Did JPOX 1.1.7 get released yesterday?
On 3/7/07, Erik Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI, JPOX 1.1.7 will be released next monday. It fixes the issue with
postgres.
You can try it out, if you like, before we release.
http://www.jpox.org/downloads/maven/jpox/jars/jpox-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
R
I just started up a newly-built instance of Continuum and am getting the
following error on startup.
Environment: JBoss 4.0.5
Continuum checked out from source with the patches from CONTINUUM-1167 and
CONTINUUM-961.
JBoss log fragment..
2007-03-13 14:09:05,924 [main] INFO BuildExecutorManage
Some of these repressed memories are flooding back... It definitely has
something to do with the preprocessing maven does in a reactor. Here's
why I think that:
I have a build with several high level parents containing many children
like this:
Root
/services
/appliations
/ui
/data
/assemblies
I w
That's the whole problem. Once I start paring down my build to something
I can give out publically, it stops occuring.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:22 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: "Component returned which
On 3/13/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is
speaking. Anyone want to get together there?
i'll be there over the queens day weekend as well as the conference
- robert
---
Hi,
Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is
speaking. Anyone want to get together there?
I'm currently working on the content of the training I'm doing... if
anyone is interested in reviewing, etc. let me know.
- Brett
--
On 3/13/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
to be perfectly honest, I think there are a number of smelly parts
inside of continuum right now, I have worked out designs and written
mails on the subject a number of times to this list, but I haven't had
the time to just sit down and fix t
On Tue, March 13, 2007 7:44 pm, Brett Porter wrote:
> Sounds like a great question to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
>
> (and with over 3 times as many subscribers, your odds of an answer
> are much, much better)
I have posted a number of questions to the users lists recently, none of
which have receiv
On 3/13/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A bit of (constructive) criticism ahead
These are the numbers I see in jira right now
1.1-alpha-1 11
1.1-alpha-2 72
1.1-alpha-# 156
that is correct, and I frankly don't think there is a hill of beans
chance of resolving all of
A couple of things:
1. Once the first alpha is released, why not try to put a new one out
there every week or every two weeks? Anything scheduled for the alpha-2
release (for example) that isn't done could be moved back to alpha-3, and so
on.
2. I'd love to be able to try to provide m
On 3/13/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do we want to release the final 1.1 in 2050?
I think you might need to help with the definition of 'constructive'
criticism :)
it's just my english that is badly :p
> This is how it looks to me from outside, as I didn't have time lately
Sounds like a great question to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
(and with over 3 times as many subscribers, your odds of an answer
are much, much better)
On 13/03/2007, at 10:39 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I have a pom file, that using ant generates a C++ library, which is
then
packaged
On 12/03/2007, at 7:35 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
having to resolve the snapshot dependencies are precisely the reason I
didn't want to mess with the maven release plugin for this. I would
have to release a new plexus-security and probably a couple of other
little higgly piggly bits. I think
Hi all,
I have a pom file, that using ant generates a C++ library, which is then
packaged as a jar.
The ant build is attached to the generate-resources phase, and when you
run "mvn resources:resources" the library is correctly copied to
target/classes.
However: when you run "mvn install", the re
A bit of (constructive) criticism ahead
On 3/9/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have gone through jira issues there were assigned to 1.1 and spread
things out a bit.
here is my criteria I used in separating out the issues:
1.1-alpha-1 -> issues that need to be addressed asap be
On 13/03/2007, at 10:24 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
It could actually go on its own page if it's a separated now no?
Each project with its own download page?
According to my comment in the site I was thinking of going the other
way and having all downloads on one page...
I don't really
On 13 Mar 07, at 9:51 AM 13 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 13/03/2007, at 12:21 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/Bad2.0.3Reference.png
Got it.
I would prefer the site plugin be fixed.
Me too. And I'd like a pony.
Barring that I don't particularly care pr
Hi Jason,
A few docs were removed that had various documentation 'todos' with
the comment 'moved to JIRA', but I'm having trouble finding some of
them.
eg. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/src/site/apt/
documentation-required.apt?view=markup&pathrev=516946
Were these filed,
I have looked at the code for the 1.0-alpha-9-stable and it is
considerably different. In fact the bug that I fixed is not present
(as far as I can see) in that version...
If perhaps someone could replicate it in that version then I could
look into it.
Andy
On 13 Mar 2007, at 15:07, Jaso
Grzegorz Slowikowski a écrit :
- Original Message - From: "Emmanuel Venisse"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Preparing Maven SCM 1.0
Hi,
I'd like to release Maven 1.0 in next weeks. As you can see, I updated
jira for this version.
Before
On 13/03/2007, at 12:21 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/Bad2.0.3Reference.png
Got it.
I would prefer the site plugin be fixed.
Me too. And I'd like a pony.
Barring that I don't particularly care provided I don't have to
update 20 references when I releas
- Original Message -
From: "Emmanuel Venisse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Preparing Maven SCM 1.0
Hi,
I'd like to release Maven 1.0 in next weeks. As you can see, I updated
jira for this version.
Before to do it, we need to fix some maj
Hmm, yes there is a good chance I could fix it on the branch, I will
get that sorted.
Andy
On 13 Mar 2007, at 15:07, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 13 Mar 07, at 6:53 AM 13 Mar 07, Andrew Williams wrote:
It is possible that the error was slowing things down, as
returning the wrong manager could
On 13 Mar 07, at 4:10 AM 13 Mar 07, Piotr Tabor wrote:
Hello,
I would like to join the Maven team and help you fixing bugs in the
project.
If you want to be part of the team then you supply patches, and work
one or more of us to get them applied. They should have lots of tests
if you w
On 13 Mar 07, at 1:30 AM 13 Mar 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Weird. Can you paste the surefire logs please?
I believe they are caused by the testing harness. I too get failures
but have been using it to make the embedder source jar for 10 bundles
or so. I was just going to switch it off th
On 13 Mar 07, at 6:53 AM 13 Mar 07, Andrew Williams wrote:
It is possible that the error was slowing things down, as returning
the wrong manager could cause a tree to be traversed rather than
returning the first leaf.
Getting it into 2.0.6 is not very likely, as it is cutting edge
contai
Hrm, that's a bummer. Thanks for looking into it. Is there any
possibility of patching a version that can run on 2.0.x? I'd be willing
to take something and use it internally if needed, if a patch is
possible.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesd
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
I'd like to release Maven 1.0 in next weeks. As you can see, I updated
jira for this version.
Before to do it, we need to fix some major issues with some providers.
CVS:
Lot of users have pb with the actual cvs provider because each some cvs
client doesn't u
I can refactor it to use a method parameter that will be better.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Shouldn't the use of sys props be removed from inside an API?
On 13/03/2007, at 2:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Tue Mar 13 02:22:53 2007
New Revision: 517605
URL: http:/
Hi,
I'd like to release Maven 1.0 in next weeks. As you can see, I updated jira for
this version.
Before to do it, we need to fix some major issues with some providers.
CVS:
Lot of users have pb with the actual cvs provider because each some cvs client doesn't understand all "standard" paramet
What do you mean by "check it with checkstyle first"??
Any how, I would rather getting it from official place (
http://maven.apache.org/developers/maven-eclipse-codestyle.xml )
in the long term.
I will checkout the one at the eclipse plugin's svn
-D
On 3/13/07, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTEC
+1
Dan
On Monday 12 March 2007 23:28, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-2
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-pl
>ug in-2.0-alpha-2/
>
> Staged at:
> http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository
>
> Chang
It is possible that the error was slowing things down, as returning
the wrong manager could cause a tree to be traversed rather than
returning the first leaf.
Getting it into 2.0.6 is not very likely, as it is cutting edge
container which I don't think is slated to move to the 2.0.x branch.
Shouldn't the use of sys props be removed from inside an API?
On 13/03/2007, at 2:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Tue Mar 13 02:22:53 2007
New Revision: 517605
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517605
Log:
Remove java5 code
Modified:
maven/scm/trunk/mav
2007/3/11, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Okay, r516945 looks like it's just for individual pages. I think Tom
was asking about publishing the entire site for each version, which
was discussed a bit last year.
Yes, that's the word. I think it would be easier to maintain and
prepare the sit
Thanks Andy! When you found the problem, does it make sense that it was
causing my builds to slow down even when I disabled the warning output?
Is there any chance we can get this in 2.0.6?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7
I fixed this last week, and is now released in plexus-containers 1.0-
alpha-19.
This fix is present in maven-2.1-SNAPSHOT also.
Andy
On 27 Feb 2007, at 14:47, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I've been seeing this forever, it's very annoying. It significantly
slows down our build when this happens, someth
Hello,
I would like to join the Maven team and help you fixing bugs in the project.
I'm Maven user for over a year and I have organized many big projects
using the tool.
I am "maven expert" in company I am working in.
Maven is a great software and i would like to add my work to it.
I submitted
Jesse McConnell wrote:
> I think we shouldn't worry about making these actually releases cut
> with the maven-release-plugin. I say we just make a build and get it
> available for download. Also tag the continuum trunk accordingly.
> Then we ought to try to release a new alpha every few weeks u
Dan Tran wrote:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/maven-eclipse-codestyle.xml
seems to be out of date ( the throws, extend, etc do not split )
Do we have another official one?
I use
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src/optional/eclipse-config/maven-
Weird. Can you paste the surefire logs please?
On 3/13/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm seeing test failures in maven-source-plugin. Anyone else?
On Windows w/ Maven 2.0.5:
Failed tests:
testProject003(org.apache.maven.plugin.source.SourceJarMojoTest)
testProject007(org.apac
Oh yeah +1
I must say, this plugin kicks ass!
Stéphane
On 3/13/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-2
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-plug
in-2.0-alpha-2/
Staged at:
http://people.apache.org
59 matches
Mail list logo
