Hi,
Sometimes continuum hangs or stop on this machine (I don't know the reason).
I'd like to restart it but I don't have karma on this machine.
Is-it possible to have ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
+1
brettporter wrote:
>
> Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional
> on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
> discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the
> work. Alex is already a committer on Struts at Apac
I think that's my fault. Sorry about breaking your IDE config. I didn't
think that it was normal to load up .java files in the src/test/resources
directory as compilable classes.
FWIW, I have been trying to avoid numbering ITs (e.g. "it0047") because I
don't think names like that communicate us
Today I checked in an integration test for SUREFIRE-389
(IncompatibleClassChangeError when useSystemClassLoader=true). You get an
ICCE simply by running "mvn test -Dsurefire.useSystemClassLoader=true" on
the quickstart archetype; it's pretty bad.
The problem appears to be in the plexus-arch
Please report this in JIRA, as attachment to mailing lists have a nasty
habit of being forgotten.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY
Grégory Joseph wrote:
Hi,
I painfully discovered recently that the trunk of the assembly plugin
seems to be broken. I'd been using the snapshot (20071017
Hi,
I painfully discovered recently that the trunk of the assembly plugin
seems to be broken. I'd been using the snapshot (20071017.162810) from
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository happily for a
while, but since I had to do releases, I went the hardcore way and did
an internal dep
As I discuss in SUREFIRE-303, there appears to be no way to report JUnit 4
@Ignores, even in principle.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-303
I can't find ANY example of a JUnit XML file that lists out the ignored
tests anywhere on the web. Ant 1.7 just throws @Ignored tests away, as
+1
Hervé
Le jeudi 22 novembre 2007, nicolas de loof a écrit :
> +1
>
> I really like the run-in-debug mode introduced by MNG-2105.
>
> 2007/11/22, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few
> > weeks now and no new issues have surfac
+1
Hervé
Le vendredi 23 novembre 2007, Brett Porter a écrit :
> Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional
> on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
> discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the
> work. Alex is already
+1
Hervé
Le mercredi 21 novembre 2007, Brett Porter a écrit :
> I'd like to call a vote for Nicolas de Loof as a committer, based
> primarily on his work for Archiva, but also from being active in the
> general Maven community for quite some time. He has been relentlessly
> testing and identifyin
+1
Hervé
Le mercredi 21 novembre 2007, Vincent Siveton a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In the preparation of the Maven Clean Plugin release, I would like to
> release the maven-shared-io:1.1
> The last release was done around one year ago.
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~vsiveton/staging-repo/
The Continuum team is pleased to announce the Continuum 1.1 final release
Highlights are:
* bug fixes
* A new backup tool with xmlrpc for continuum db
You can grab the latest release from the download page :
http://maven.apache.org/continuum/download.html
To upgrade from a previous 1.
+1
On 22 Nov 07, at 10:07 AM 22 Nov 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few
weeks now and no new issues have surfaced. (the packaging issues with
the uber jar have been resolved since the last vote)
The release is staged at:
http://people.
+1
Stéphane
On Nov 22, 2007 5:07 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few
> weeks now and no new issues have surfaced. (the packaging issues with
> the uber jar have been resolved since the last vote)
>
>
>
> The release is
+1
On 23 Nov 07, at 5:52 AM 23 Nov 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully
functional on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan
Fabulich are now discussing this on the surefire-dev list and
looking to complete the work. Alex is already a c
+1 Release it!
- Joakim
Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Hi Everyone,
The Archiva 1.0 release candidate has been prepared. Regressions for m1
proxy requests found in 1.0-beta-4 have been fixed and the important
documents for the site have been completed.
You can take a look at the release notes for Ar
+1!
The source builds with tests skipped, as I found one problem
otherwise - the source build fails with a test error in the
repository layer that doesn't happen on trunk - I don't think this is
a blocker and probably just needs an extra note in the release notes
and investigate later why
[X] +0 "Let's release it, even if I'd expect some more fixes !"
Not voting 0 or -1 as some stable archiva release is expected for too long,
but archiva CANNOT be used with legacy maven1 projects as it cannot serve
jaxen-1.0-FCS-full, that is used by some maven1 core plugins
Applying my MRM-594 fi
Great job to everyone involved in this release - especially Emmanuel
and Olivier for the recent drive to release :)
Looking forward to 1.2!
Cheers,
Brett
On 23/11/2007, at 10:45 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Below are the results of this vote:
5 Binding Votes (Stephane, Jesse, Wendy, Brett,
Below are the results of this vote:
5 Binding Votes (Stephane, Jesse, Wendy, Brett, and Myself)
3 Non-binding vote (Olivier, Damien, Vivek )
I'll finalize the release and will send an update.
Thanks,
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
Continuum 1.1 Final is ready for release
The highl
Hi Everyone,
The Archiva 1.0 release candidate has been prepared. Regressions for m1
proxy requests found in 1.0-beta-4 have been fixed and the important
documents for the site have been completed.
You can take a look at the release notes for Archiva 1.0 here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Rel
On Fri, November 23, 2007 3:35 pm, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> I know why my plugin fails, but I don't know why other maven plugins can
> handle the situation. I did now a bad hack and will look for the attached
> artifact at the same location as the main artifact is located and only if
> I cannot find
+1
Nice to get good support on Surefire, that is not the simpliest part of
maven...
2007/11/23, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional
> on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
> discussing this on the
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/22, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few
> weeks now and no new issues have surfaced. (the packaging issues with
> the uber jar have been resolved since the last vote)
>
>
>
> The release is staged at:
> h
Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Fri, November 23, 2007 10:30 am, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> We use since long ago an own plugin, that accesses a secondary
>> artifact of a dependency. This worked like charm ... until now. We
>> have now the new situation, that the secondary artifact is build in
>> the s
+1
Fabrice
On Nov 23, 2007 12:52 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional
> on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
> discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the
> work.
+1
-Lukas
Brett Porter wrote:
Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional
on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the
work. Alex is already a committer on Struts at Apache
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/23, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional
> on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
> discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the
> work. Alex is already
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional on
Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the
work. Alex is already a committer on Struts at Apach
+1 :)
On Nov 21, 2007 5:08 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote for Nicolas de Loof as a committer, based
> primarily on his work for Archiva, but also from being active in the
> general Maven community for quite some time. He has been relentlessly
> testing and id
Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional
on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the
work. Alex is already a committer on Struts at Apache and one of the
founders of Test
+1
-Lukas
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
In the preparation of the Maven Clean Plugin release, I would like to
release the maven-shared-io:1.1
The last release was done around one year ago.
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~vsiveton/staging-repo/
Vote open for 72 hours.
Here is my +1
[ ]
On Fri, November 23, 2007 10:30 am, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> We use since long ago an own plugin, that accesses a secondary artifact of
> a dependency. This worked like charm ... until now. We have now the new
> situation, that the secondary artifact is build in the same multi project
> build by one
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
Everything is working fine (embedding in Tomcat, mysql database
upgrade with proxy), so
+1
Damien Lecan
On Nov 22, 2007 6:35 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have two things to check:
>
> - Make sure that when run in the context of Maven (the embedder) that
> http proxying works
> - Make sure that everything works offline well (I've removed the wiki
> slurping as it proved to be en
Hi folks,
can someone shed some light onto the release:prepare mechanism?
We use since long ago an own plugin, that accesses a secondary artifact of a
dependency. This worked like charm ... until now. We have now the new
situation, that the secondary artifact is build in the same multi project
36 matches
Mail list logo
