Re: Continuum and Build Profiles

On Dec 14, 2007 5:41 AM, Tomislav Stojcevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree it is confusing. Renaming to Build Profile would help, but how about Build Environment instead? I think Build Environment is better, thanks. The word Profile just sends anyone who already knows Maven down a

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

So, what's next? This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get started on it? From past experience the steps would be: - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in participating in the TLP - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC

Doxia Parsing API?

Hi, I'd like to implement a Doxia parser for XWiki. However I've noticed there's no standard in Doxia yet for parsing. Actually looking at Doxia confluence, twiki and Apt I see each does it with his own code. However the Confluence and TWiki implementations are very similar, each

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker plugin version 1.1

Nobody ? Thanks, -- Olivier 17 Dec 2007 09:31:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'd like to release maven-invoker-plugin 1.1. This release fixes some bugs and makes some improvements. The last release was made over 1 year ago. We solved 11 issues :

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-dependency-tree 1.1

Result 4 +1 (1 non binding) pushing to apache repo On Dec 17, 2007 10:07 PM, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Carlos, What's the scoop on this release? Add my +1 to it, I see it's still in your staging repo but isn't out on central yet. I need this to do a dependency plugin release.

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-osgi 0.2.0

ping On Dec 3, 2007 7:05 PM, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: some more votes please ;) On Nov 29, 2007 12:11 AM, Stuart McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29/11/2007, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It includes bugfixes in the osgi-maven version conversion

possible performance bottleneck in current trunk

Hello, i've started building my project with current 2.1-SNAPSHOT trunk and I noticed the build is taking more time than before. I did a bit of profiling. I've executed mvn install on a set of 24 projects, all build before, right before the profiling test. What struck me is that half of the time

Re: possible performance bottleneck in current trunk

On Dec 19, 2007 8:10 PM, Milos Kleint [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, i've started building my project with current 2.1-SNAPSHOT trunk and I noticed the build is taking more time than before. I did a bit of profiling. I've executed mvn install on a set of 24 projects, all build before, right

Re: defining goals that aggregate other maven goals

Nice. Thanks, Stuart. On Dec 18, 2007 9:33 AM, Stuart McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/12/2007, Pete Aykroyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I've been running into that... but wasn't aware that it was expected behavior. Thanks for the heads up. I've searched around and have

Re: possible performance bottleneck in current trunk

On 19 Dec 07, at 11:10 AM 19 Dec 07, Milos Kleint wrote: Hello, i've started building my project with current 2.1-SNAPSHOT trunk and I noticed the build is taking more time than before. I did a bit of profiling. I've executed mvn install on a set of 24 projects, all build before, right

RE: possible performance bottleneck in current trunk

Would it be safe to hold on to the resolved dependencies per scope / project? So if two plugins in the same project consecutively ask for scope=test, we don't have to go fetch them again? The current impl simply leaves those dependencies around which means plugins that don't properly declare the

Re: possible performance bottleneck in current trunk

here is the actual screenshot. http://picasaweb.google.com/mkleint/Maven more inline.. On Dec 19, 2007 9:19 PM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19 Dec 07, at 11:10 AM 19 Dec 07, Milos Kleint wrote: Hello, i've started building my project with current 2.1-SNAPSHOT trunk and

Re: possible performance bottleneck in current trunk

On 19 Dec 07, at 12:28 PM 19 Dec 07, Milos Kleint wrote: here is the actual screenshot. http://picasaweb.google.com/mkleint/Maven more inline.. On Dec 19, 2007 9:19 PM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19 Dec 07, at 11:10 AM 19 Dec 07, Milos Kleint wrote: Hello, i've started

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker plugin version 1.1

+1 On 19 Dec 07, at 12:41 AM 19 Dec 07, olivier lamy wrote: Nobody ? Thanks, -- Olivier 17 Dec 2007 09:31:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'd like to release maven-invoker-plugin 1.1. This release fixes some bugs and makes some improvements. The last release was made

RE: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker plugin version 1.1

+1, thought I already voted..sorry. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 4:50 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker plugin version 1.1 +1 On 19 Dec 07, at 12:41 AM 19 Dec 07, olivier lamy

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-osgi 0.2.0

+1 On 20/12/2007, at 1:29 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote: ping On Dec 3, 2007 7:05 PM, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: some more votes please ;) On Nov 29, 2007 12:11 AM, Stuart McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29/11/2007, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It includes

[VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.4

Hi, Maven Surefire version 2.4 is on the runway. Hopefully folks have spent some time trying out the SNAPSHOT version, because we expect ordinary users to get auto-upgraded to version 2.4 when we decide to release. This version fixes numerous long-outstanding bugs, notably in TestNG

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-osgi 0.2.0

+1 Stéphane On Dec 19, 2007 3:29 PM, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ping On Dec 3, 2007 7:05 PM, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: some more votes please ;) On Nov 29, 2007 12:11 AM, Stuart McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29/11/2007, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL