No worries, I'll take it out before I release the alpha-1.
On 26-Feb-08, at 10:59 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 27/02/2008, at 5:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I would actually like you to hold off on trying to put webav in the
distro. I'm going to try and dynamically have it loaded. We can do
On 27/02/2008, at 5:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I would actually like you to hold off on trying to put webav in the
distro. I'm going to try and dynamically have it loaded. We can do
whatever in 2.0.x as that's what people are doing but I don't want
to release the 2.1-alpha with any more d
I would actually like you to hold off on trying to put webav in the
distro. I'm going to try and dynamically have it loaded. We can do
whatever in 2.0.x as that's what people are doing but I don't want to
release the 2.1-alpha with any more dependencies that are necessary
and I think anythi
On 26-Feb-08, at 9:02 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Rahul Thakur
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On a related note, I have always wondered why Maven was not using
OSGi
underneath?
Probably because OSGi didn't exist when Maven was started.
It did exist. But did
On 26-Feb-08, at 6:47 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 27/02/2008, at 12:59 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
this didn't give me any luck unfortunately. I'm not entirely
comfortable tossing commons-logging into the root classloader at
this stage without tying it into the plexus logging properly, so I
On 26-Feb-08, at 6:29 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
On a related note, I have always wondered why Maven was not using
OSGi underneath?
Because it wasn't very mature 3 years ago, and aside from the
classloader mechanism which is really quite amazing there isn't much
in the component model t
Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, seems there is some interest in putting together a proposal. I'm
going to follow the same format we used at Continuum last month.
Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the bo
I took a stab at making wagon-http WebDAV aware (WAGON-99).
I have this experimental code in the following branch.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/wagon/branches/wagon-http-with-webdav
It needs some more work and unit testing, but the bones are there.
This branch adds the 2 missing HttpM
http://plexus.codehaus.org/faq.html
Basically there weren't other Ioc's at the time.
-Original Message-
From: Barrie Treloar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 12:03 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: trunk & shading
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Rah
>I didnt quite understand this. depMngmt in plugins you use is ignored,
>so how could you override a plugin dependency using this bug?
My understanding of the bug is that if you specify depMgt in _your_
project, it will influence the plugin's classpath. That means you could
force a plugin to use
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Rahul Thakur
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On a related note, I have always wondered why Maven was not using OSGi
> underneath?
Probably because OSGi didn't exist when Maven was started.
Plexus is used instead.
There is a document somewhere describing why Jaso
On 27/02/2008, at 12:59 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
this didn't give me any luck unfortunately. I'm not entirely
comfortable tossing commons-logging into the root classloader at
this stage without tying it into the plexus logging properly, so I
think the pre-shaded webdav library is the way
On a related note, I have always wondered why Maven was not using OSGi
underneath?
Rahul
Paul Benedict wrote:
Would shading be eliminated if Maven 2.1 integrated OSGi so that component
and plugin dependencies can be totally isolated from each other (i.e.,
privatized)?
Paul
On Tue, Feb 26,
Would shading be eliminated if Maven 2.1 integrated OSGi so that component
and plugin dependencies can be totally isolated from each other (i.e.,
privatized)?
Paul
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 26-Feb-08, at 5:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> >
>
On 26-Feb-08, at 5:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 27/02/2008, at 11:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
The reason for this is that commons-logging in the root
classloader makes plugins unhappy (and the error reporting seems
to be swallowed now).
What about using slf4j and it's commons-lo
On 27/02/2008, at 11:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
The reason for this is that commons-logging in the root classloader
makes plugins unhappy (and the error reporting seems to be
swallowed now).
What about using slf4j and it's commons-logging replacement?
this didn't give me any luck
I didnt quite understand this. depMngmt in plugins you use is ignored,
so how could you override a plugin dependency using this bug?
other than that what's the overall consensus on fixing this for 2.0.9
? I vote for fixing it
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On 26-Feb-08, at 4:27 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
To implement MNG-2664 on trunk (inclusion of webdav), one of three
choices must be made:
- put back the shading that is used in 2.0.x
This is terrible for debugging maven and makes working with the
embedder a royal PITA. So no on this op
Hi,
To implement MNG-2664 on trunk (inclusion of webdav), one of three
choices must be made:
- put back the shading that is used in 2.0.x
- make a pre-shaded wagon-webdav artifact
- make commons-logging work in $M2_HOME/lib
The reason for this is that commons-logging in the root classloader
Ok, I see now this only occurs if you run it under a different
user.dir than the maven-core-integration-tests - probably easily fixed
so I'll take a peek.
On 26/02/2008, at 11:05 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi John,
Is the second IT for this issue passing for you? Both I and
Continuum get th
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Fabrice Bellingard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> +1
> I still have some critical bugs with the filtering, but let's release this
> one. I'll try to look into that this w-e, and see how to use the shared
> filtering component that Olivier Lamy has started to develop
Oh no, Julia is out of the office again... I hope she feels better and
returns to work soon. ;-)
Wayne
On 2/26/08, Julia Antonova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I will be out of the office starting 25.02.2008 and will not return until
> 29.02.2008.
>
> I will respond to your message when I retur
Yes, many of these can certainly wait though I think reviewing the
license headers should be done.
On 26/02/2008, at 11:19 PM, Sejal Patel wrote:
Ok so it sounds like you are good to go for a beta-2 and I'm pretty
sure we
are all aware that there are a lot of little issues like what you
ni
I will be out of the office starting 25.02.2008 and will not return until
29.02.2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Trying again, got denied because message size was over the
limit...see below.
Begin forwarded message:
IIRC, it wasn't related to a jira issue, just something I was
discussing informally with someone.
-john
On Feb 25, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I assume this is rolling back r
Ok so it sounds like you are good to go for a beta-2 and I'm pretty sure we
are all aware that there are a lot of little issues like what you nicely
bulleted out that prevent this from being a 2.2 final release.
It is great that you took the time to create this list though. Will make it
much much
26 matches
Mail list logo
