how to treat Exceptions in ScmResults?

2009-05-06 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! I'm currently implementing the maven-scm-providers-jgit and like to know how others did handle e.g. CheckOutScmResult for Java implemented SCM connectors. Especially what to do if an Exception occurred? How do you transport this nested Exception? fill only e.getMessage() or is there a

SHA

2009-05-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
just a heads up that maven may need to switch from SHA1 to SHA512 (or higher). not sure how difficult that will be. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: SHA

2009-05-06 Thread Brett Porter
For artifact checksums? They are not a security measure, so I don't think increasing their length is of benefit. Having read the same mail I'm guessing you did, it made me reflect and we probably should have kept using md5 for efficiency TBH. Cheers, Brett On 06/05/2009, at 4:11 PM,

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC2

2009-05-06 Thread Paul MERLIN
Le mardi 05 mai 2009 23:46:23, Brian Fox a écrit : What options are being passed to the release invocation? It's using -f which seems to be invalid. I used the following instruction for prepare : mvn -B release:prepare -DreleaseVersion=0.4.0 -DdevelopmentVersion=0.5.0- SNAPSHOT And for the

Re: SHA

2009-05-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: For artifact checksums? They are not a security measure, so I don't think increasing their length is of benefit. Having read the same mail I'm guessing you did, it made me reflect and we probably should have kept using md5

m2eclipse embedded maven still 2.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-05-06 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi, As I'm using enforcer plugin to check maven version is = 2.1.0 I just noticed m2eclipse 0.9.8 embedded maven still reports version 2.1-SNAPSHOT I may be wrong but AFAIK embeddedMaven is build from trunk (3.0-SNAPSHOT) - does this mean m2eclipse uses a some-months-old version ?

Re: m2eclipse embedded maven still 2.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-05-06 Thread Milos Kleint
not an expert on m2eclipse but netbeans is also using a quite old version of 2.1-SNAPSHOT (from last June to be precise). The current trunk is not there yet (and since it will take some effort to migrate I will wait for betas as least). I've got the same issue reported (not with enforcer, but the

Re: m2eclipse embedded maven still 2.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-05-06 Thread Igor Fedorenko
This is correct, m2e 0.9.8 uses old 2.1.0 embedder from before 2.1-3.0 version rename. We plan to update embedder to real 3.0 in 0.9.9. For now, you should be able to move enforcer execution to a profile, which is not activated in m2e. -- Regards, Igor nicolas de loof wrote: Hi, As I'm

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC2

2009-05-06 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On 5 May 2009, at 01:02, John Casey wrote: After finding and cleaning up some code that seems to be tainted during some of our efforts at generifying the codebase, we've respun a new release candidate. If you have time, please give it a whirl:

Re: m2eclipse embedded maven still 2.1-SNAPSHOT ?

2009-05-06 Thread nicolas de loof
Is there any way to activate such a profile by detecting m2eclipse is running (using some property) ? 2009/5/6 Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com This is correct, m2e 0.9.8 uses old 2.1.0 embedder from before 2.1-3.0 version rename. We plan to update embedder to real 3.0 in 0.9.9. For now,

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC2

2009-05-06 Thread John Casey
This looks like a problem in the httpclient-driven http wagon. Dominic Mitchell wrote: On 5 May 2009, at 01:02, John Casey wrote: After finding and cleaning up some code that seems to be tainted during some of our efforts at generifying the codebase, we've respun a new release candidate. If

Re: SHA

2009-05-06 Thread Oleg Gusakov
fyi: - maven password encryption uses SHA-256 and switching to SHA-512 could be done using optional encrypted string attributes to ensure decryption of the existing passwords. SHA-256 is already SHA2 family and has not been cracked yet, so we can wait. Main question was availability of