[GitHub] [maven-site] michael-o commented on a change in pull request #188: Introduce section heading for BOM pattern
michael-o commented on a change in pull request #188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/188#discussion_r463952483
##
File path:
content/apt/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.apt
##
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ Introduction to the Dependency Mechanism
* {{{Importing_Dependencies}Importing Dependencies}}
+ * {{{bill-of-materials-bom-poms}Bill of Materials (BOM) poms}}
Review comment:
That is not what I was referring to.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.5.0
See MRESOLVER-123. Please define slow in comparable numbers. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Dan Tran Datum: 01.08.20 11:33 (GMT+01:00) An: Maven Developers List Betreff: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.5.0 I am interesting pickup latest maven-resolver hoping it can solve somerandom issue at our buildsSince 1.5.0 no longer available, I rebuilt maven 3.6.3 with maven-resolver1.5.1-SNAPSHOT. and hook it up our internal buildThe startup of my build is quite slow... however, I am looking forward totesting again with next maven-resolver voteThanks-DOn Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:03 AM Mark Derricutt wrote:> Hervé, Michael - missed the email about the vote earlier, just went hunting> for the repo details to try it out on our internal range resolver/locking> tool.>> +1 NON Binding here - passes my unit tests on my library, and the maven> mojo that uses it runs fine as works as expected.>> Mark>>> On 22 July 2020 at 6:05:39 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY (herve.bout...@free.fr)> wrote:>> hey, keep cool, take time: 72h is the minimum, not the period after which> the vote stops there was some discussions, people are on vacation, it takes> more time than usual, nothing that a little bit of time won't solve> Regards, Hervé Le mardi 21 juillet 2020, 20:32:49 CEST Michael Osipov a> écrit : > Hi, > > The vote has passed and failed to reach a quorum. Only> one, non-binding > vote has been cast. Therefore, I cancel the release and> will drop the > staging repo tomorrow. > > Michael>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.5.0
I am interesting pickup latest maven-resolver hoping it can solve some random issue at our builds Since 1.5.0 no longer available, I rebuilt maven 3.6.3 with maven-resolver 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT. and hook it up our internal build The startup of my build is quite slow... however, I am looking forward to testing again with next maven-resolver vote Thanks -D On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:03 AM Mark Derricutt wrote: > Hervé, Michael - missed the email about the vote earlier, just went hunting > for the repo details to try it out on our internal range resolver/locking > tool. > > +1 NON Binding here - passes my unit tests on my library, and the maven > mojo that uses it runs fine as works as expected. > > Mark > > > On 22 July 2020 at 6:05:39 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY (herve.bout...@free.fr) > wrote: > > hey, keep cool, take time: 72h is the minimum, not the period after which > the vote stops there was some discussions, people are on vacation, it takes > more time than usual, nothing that a little bit of time won't solve > Regards, Hervé Le mardi 21 juillet 2020, 20:32:49 CEST Michael Osipov a > écrit : > Hi, > > The vote has passed and failed to reach a quorum. Only > one, non-binding > vote has been cast. Therefore, I cancel the release and > will drop the > staging repo tomorrow. > > Michael >
[GitHub] [maven-site] mkarg commented on a change in pull request #188: Introduce section heading for BOM pattern
mkarg commented on a change in pull request #188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/188#discussion_r463934565
##
File path:
content/apt/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.apt
##
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ Introduction to the Dependency Mechanism
* {{{Importing_Dependencies}Importing Dependencies}}
+ * {{{bill-of-materials-bom-poms}Bill of Materials (BOM) poms}}
Review comment:
I think what Ed wanted to say with this is correct: "Bill of Material -
style POM, a.k.a. BOM"
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] [maven-site] michael-o commented on a change in pull request #188: Introduce section heading for BOM pattern
michael-o commented on a change in pull request #188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/188#discussion_r463934456
##
File path:
content/apt/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.apt
##
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ Introduction to the Dependency Mechanism
* {{{Importing_Dependencies}Importing Dependencies}}
+ * {{{bill-of-materials-bom-poms}Bill of Materials (BOM) poms}}
Review comment:
poms > POMs
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 3.3.3
ok, I see: it will be tricky to reproduce... I fear I won't be able to publish to "Reproducible Central" https://github.com/jvm-repo-rebuild/reproducible-central for future releases, I think we should avoid such toolchain usage It means that before doing a release, checking if javadoc can be built should also be done, to avoid discovering issues during the release Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 31 juillet 2020, 08:42:26 CEST Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > Thanks Hervé, > > The build was done using AdoptOpenJdk 8 update 242, but using toolchains. > Failed Javadoc was one of the reasons for using toolchains, there were just > soo many errors. The toolchain itself used Java 7 update 79 from Oracle, so > the bytecode should be different if you don't use toolchains. > > You can see more details about my build process and problems in this JIRA > issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-419 > > -- > Dennis Lundberg > > Den tors 30 juli 2020 kl 22:36 skrev Hervé BOUTEMY : > > +1 > > > > trying to check reproducible builds, found that reference build was done > > with > > JDK 8 on Windows > > But I got 2 issues to reproduce: > > 1. javadoc fails with JDK 8 > > 2. your bytecode is different from mine > > > > what detailed distribution of JDK did you use, please? Mine is > > AdoptOpenJDK > > 1.8.0_202 > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le vendredi 24 juillet 2020, 16:08:10 CEST Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > We solved 12 > > > > > issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12342 > > > > 756=Text=12317922=Create_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4 > > JA> > > > -FDED_7bf996098e890abc72bf3628a70b9090574f431d_lin > > > > > > There are still a couple of issues left in > > > > > JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AN > > > > D%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20maven-shared-u > > ti> > > > ls%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC > > > > > > Staging > > > > > repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1598/https:// > > > > repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/maven-1598/content/org/ap > > ac > > > > he/maven/shared/maven-shared-utils/3.3.3/maven-shared-utils-3.3.3-source-r > > el> > > > ease.zip > > > > > > Source release checksum(s): > > > > > maven-shared-utils-3.3.3-source-release.zip sha512: > > 6085d3bb3d065efaca7ed43f7342c2b71c624235ff38cd1410a06a4c915e39a13cb00e65e8 > > c0> > > > cd7203dc5b2d1deeb392eaab2aa0a43bfadb7c9d4286a2b473bc > > > > > > Staging > > > > > site: > > https://maven.apache.org/components/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils > > > > > -LATEST/ > > > > > > Guide to testing staged > > > > > releases: > > https://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases. > > > > > html > > > > > > Vote open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1 > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 > > > > > > As some of you might have noticed we ended up with version 3.3.3 instead > > > > of > > > > > the planned 3.3.1. I had some issues with the release process and burned > > > > 2 > > > > > releases. I will address that in a JIRA issue shortly. Please let me > > > know > > > if I have missed anything. > > > > > > -- > > > Dennis Lundberg > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
