Re: [VOTE][CANCELLED] Release Maven 3.2.0

Thanks Stuart for this confirmation, I am seeing this exact issue happen on both 3.1.x and 3.2. My build uses truezip-maven-plugin [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ---

Re: maven-stage-plugin / maven-repository-plugin

wagon-maven-plugin and vfs-maven-plugin do this. vfs was introduce since wagon-m-p is heavily depends on maven runtime. ( wagon-maven-plugin currently not wokring with mvn 3.1 out of box due to missing jars at maven/lib directory) -D On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen < mfried

Re: maven-stage-plugin / maven-repository-plugin

I think both of your issues should be fixed at wagon itself. btw, what is wrong with https? as an input? certificate/connection related? -Dan On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > > > wagon-maven-plugin and vfs-maven-plugin do this. vfs was introduce sinc

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release version 2.5

how are we with this vote? -D On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > On 24 Feb 2014, at 5:12, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > Maven scm 1.9 does not necessarily correspond to git 1.9. You would need > to look at those release notes. > > Git 1.8.x changed the output of the hum

[FYI] maven-scm-plugin IT is failing since Feb 25

https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-scm/ Thanks -D

Re: [FYI] maven-scm-plugin IT is failing since Feb 25

change list https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-scm/changes -D On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-scm/ > > Thanks > > -D >

Re: [FYI] maven-scm-plugin IT is failing since Feb 25

ifferent one (format 31) > > don't know how wa can improve the IT to be more tolerant to svn version > updates > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le lundi 5 mai 2014 09:03:37 Dan Tran a écrit : > > change list https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-scm/changes > >

Re: [FYI] maven-scm-plugin IT is failing since Feb 25

perhaps, we need to disable this specific test for now? -D On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > > Looks like we stuck without a new snapshot until this is fixed!! > > -D > > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > >> seems re

Re: [FYI] maven-scm-plugin IT is failing since Feb 25

ne verify the code above? > > thanks, > Robert > > > Op Tue, 06 May 2014 08:43:45 +0200 schreef Dan Tran : > > > perhaps, we need to disable this specific test for now? >> >> -D >> >> >> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Dan Tran wrote: >&

Re: [FYI] maven-scm-plugin IT is failing since Feb 25

> Le lundi 5 mai 2014 23:43:45 Dan Tran a écrit : > > perhaps, we need to disable this specific test for now? > > > > -D > > > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > > > Looks like we stuck without a new snapshot until this is fixed!! > >

Re: [FYI] maven-scm-plugin IT is failing since Feb 25

t the same problem in some > time, when svn 1.9 is out > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 6 mai 2014 15:00:58 Dan Tran a écrit : > > Thanks Hervé, it works on my local windows build with svn client 1.8.5 > > > > -D > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:

Re: [FYI] maven-scm-plugin IT is failing since Feb 25

> I think Roberts' idea about "svu upgrade"ing is good >> just need to revert locally and test, or we'll get the same problem in >> some >> time, when svn 1.9 is out >> >> Regards, >> >> Hervé >> >> Le mardi 6 mai 2014 1

Re: how maven build plugins plugin use latest version

Setup your pom to use a verion properties with a default value ( somedefault then you can override externally using -Dyour.plugin.version= that my be close to what you looking for -D On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > > > > hi, all, > >> I have develope

maven-scm-provider-gitexe test failures

Hi I am running into test failures Linux: ( git version 1.7.9.5) Failed tests: GitCheckInCommandNoBranchTest.testCheckinNoBranch:75->ScmTestCase.assertResult GitCheckInCommandTest.testCheckinAfterRename:113->ScmTestCase.assertResultIsSu windows ( cygwin gitt version 1.7.9) Failed tests: Git

Re: maven-scm-provider-gitexe test failures

In another words, are you able to get maven-scm-provider-gitexe built and test passed? Thanks -D On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > > Hi I am running into test failures > > Linux: ( git version 1.7.9.5) > > Failed tests: > > GitCheckInCommandNoBranch

Re: maven-scm-provider-gitexe test failures

stable they should succeed. > IIRC you should at least use version 1.8, although I'm not sure. > > Robert > > Op Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:20:31 +0200 schreef Dan Tran : > > > In another words, are you able to get maven-scm-provider-gitexe built and >> test passed? >

Re: maven-scm-provider-gitexe test failures

Hi Hervé *Thanks for the response, does your gitexe pass TCK test?* *-D* On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > no problem on my machine: > Linux, git 1.9.1 > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 24 juin 2014 01:20:31 Dan Tran a écrit : > > In a

Re: maven-scm-provider-gitexe test failures

Upgrade my git to 1.8.x fixes. TCK test failure probably to my change at maven-scm-test's StatusCommandTckTest. This only happen for gitexe, but not jgit looking... -D On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > Hi Hervé > > *Thanks for the response, does your gitexe

Need a new JIRA component for MAVEN SCM - TCK

Hi I have been enhancing maven-scm-test to my perforce provider using p4java work Could we a new component call 'TCK'?? I am currently using 'api', but it can be very confusion, since i am not changing the api Thanks -D

Re: Need a new JIRA component for MAVEN SCM - TCK

Thanks I will update the JIRAs -D On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > done. maven-scm-tck > > > On 26 June 2014 03:19, Dan Tran wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have been enhancing maven-scm-test to my perforce provider using p4java > > work &

Re: Maven Developer Hangout

Removing Settings' mirror? we use it exclusively at work where we maintain a customize maven distribution with maven's conf/settings.xml has the mirror pointing to internal repository. I would be very much appreciated with Maven team can point me to a reference of this discussion that make Mirror

what is org.apache.maven:standalone-pom:pom:1,standalone-pom?

Hi I am playing with DependencyGraphBuilder and seeing the following artifact sneak into my list org.apache.maven:standalone-pom:pom:1,standalone-pom Any idea what it is? I am also seeing of of this from the build log, mine and from internet, but so far no-one seems to care Thanks -D

Re: what is org.apache.maven:standalone-pom:pom:1,standalone-pom?

Maven.java#L644 > > > https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-core/src/main/resources/org/apache/maven/project/standalone.xml > > On 14 Jul 2014, at 06:39, Dan Tran wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I am playing with DependencyGraphBuilder and seei

Releasing maven-scm 1.10??

Need some help to release this component so that I can release Perforce provider using p4java at workshop.perforce.com. Very much appreciated. -D

Re: Releasing maven-scm 1.10??

Hi Karl, Yes it is http://maven.apache.org/scm Will you be able to cut it? Thanks -Dan On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > > Need some help to release this component so that I can release Perforce > >> provider using p4java at workshop.perforce.com

Re: Releasing maven-scm 1.10??

I was hoping someone with much more experience releasing apache maven components to release it. Otherwise, I guest I have to roll my sleeves and go thru it ( it is my first time thou) Thanks -Dan On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > > Hi Karl, > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM Version 1.9.1

+1 - Tested with Perforce Maven SCM (P4Maven) provider at workshop.perforce.com - Built and run tck suits using the source tar ball on both windows and linux Thank for pushing this out. -Dan On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 13 issues: > http://

Re: Singleton component

http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/problem-Maven-creates-the-second-plugin-classloader-during-parallel-build-and-uses-two-classloader-hy-td5713793.html https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Class+Loading May help -d On Tuesday, July 29, 2014, wrote: > Hi, > > during the de

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.6.0

+1 (none binding) tested 300+ maven modules project with special interested of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6412 On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 1:55 PM Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote: > +1 from me. Tested based on Spring Boot multithreaded build and Java 11. > > Yes, it would be good to have r

Re: VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.0

Unfortunately, I found a regression at wagon-ssh where ssh download hangs. See https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-543 On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 2:21 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=1

Re: VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.0

The regression was introduced by https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-537 which has changes at AbstractWagon used by all providers. Best to localize the change for http provider only note: wagon-maven-plugin uses its own wagon-ssh, but still share the base class with its maven runtime. that

Re: VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.0

Revert WAGON-537 <https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-537> fixes the issue. -D On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 2:25 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2018-12-28 um 20:32 schrieb Dan Tran: > > The regression was introduced by > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-537

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.1

+1 tested with maven-3.6.1-SNAPSHOT plus wagon-3.3.1 against a large build. -D On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:28 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12344772 > > There are still a couple of issues

Re: Are snapshots available in some Maven repo?

how about just deploy nightly snapshot of active 'main' branch ( ie master)? -D On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:03 AM Robert Scholte wrote: > Now that we use branches actively, it is way more important where a > SNAPSHOT is coming from. > I've seen it too often that people thought they were testing

Re: [maven] branch master updated: [MNG-6571] forgot to put new instance in cache

I am seeing test failure at the latest maven-core. is it a known issue? [INFO] Running org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.VersionRangeTest[ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.006 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.VersionRangeTest[ERROR

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.2

+1 tested with maven-3.6.1-SNAPSHOT building large maven project -D On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 4:13 PM Tibor Digana wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:15 AM Michael Osipov > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 12 issues: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projec

Re: 3.6.1 release?

love to see 3.6.1 out soon :) -D On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:50 AM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 04.02.19 17:36, Michael Osipov wrote: > > I need to push Wagon first. It contains a regression for connection TTL. > > Yes of course.I know.. > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbais

Re: Maven 3.6.1 release date

MNG-6605 indeed is a good one to have On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:08 AM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 01.04.19 08:54, Michael Osipov wrote: > > Am 2019-03-31 um 21:36 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to collect the issues which should be part of Maven

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.1

+1 ( non-binding) Tested with a large multi-modules build using CI/CD mode + m2e under takari team Thanks -D On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 9:29 AM Mickael Istria wrote: > Hi, > > Unfortunately, we won't have the opportunity to try it in m2e before the > deadline for voting as it seems like some rece

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.3

+1 none binding, tested with Maven 3.6.2-SNAPSHOT + wagon-3.3.3 ( at staging) against an internal build Thanks for pushing out this release -D On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 3:34 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2019-06-13 um 15:46 schrieb Michael Osipov: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 6 issues: > > > https:

Re: [maven-surefire] branch master updated (f7d4310 -> 8109b4f)

@Tibor Digana I would be very helpful to deploy last surefire snapshot, so users ( like me) can easily help testing it with our internal builds Thanks -D On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:32 PM wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > tibordigana pushed a ch

Re: [maven-surefire] branch master updated (f7d4310 -> 8109b4f)

ed at the end. > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/master/53/ > We have to wait few hours because the Jenkins queue is full. > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 9:03 AM Dan Tran wrote: > >> @Tibor Digana I would be very helpful to >> deploy last surefire

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.2

+1 non-bind, tested with company production builds. Should we give Intellij user a warning? On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:05 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > > the vote passed with the following resuts: > +1 jes...@udby.com, Tibor Digana, Mickael Istria, Romain Manni-Bucau, > Francois Papon, Hervé

Re: Same snapshot deploy number for entire build - possible

Hello, Maven dev any suggestion/thoughts on this issue are very much appreciated Regards -D On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:06 PM Dan Tran wrote: > Hello Maven Users and Development Team > > Currently, artifact deployed as snapshot at Maven repository has the > following format > &g

Re: Same snapshot deploy number for entire build - possible

, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:31 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Dan, > Are you running a single 'mvn deploy' or do you have multiple runs? > I have never seen weird behaviours in multi module projects > > Cheers > Enrico > > Il ven 13 set 2019, 08:19 Dan Tran ha scritto:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

+1 tested with our 300+ maven modules build Found the following new 'good' behaviors/fixes 1. Junit 4 test class now have 'public' scope at both class and method level. 2. Exception at test 'setup' ( ie @Before) now show up as failures, They are ignored at M4 Great works Thanks On Sat,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.5.0

I am interesting pickup latest maven-resolver hoping it can solve some random issue at our builds Since 1.5.0 no longer available, I rebuilt maven 3.6.3 with maven-resolver 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT. and hook it up our internal build The startup of my build is quite slow... however, I am looking forward t

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

possible to disable this feature https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123 ? On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:06 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1, tested in java 8 with mvn 3.6.3. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

sorry about the fast finger, my test shows a huge increase in build time for large builds. Possible to disable this feature? Thanks -D On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:49 AM Dan Tran wrote: > possible to disable this feature > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123 ? > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

I build maven 3.7.0 + MResolve 1.6.0. The same slow build observed at my 300+ modules ( 60min versus 5min) -1 ( non-binding) from me. there must and option to disable this new feature -D On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:33 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2020-09-14 um 10:57 schrieb Dan T

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

analyzable data from you. > > Michael > > > Am 2020-09-15 um 11:49 schrieb Dan Tran: > > I build maven 3.7.0 + MResolve 1.6.0. The same slow build observed at my > > 300+ modules ( 60min versus 5min) > > > > -1 ( non-binding) from me. there must and optio

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:30 PM Dan Tran wrote: > Maven 3.7.0 with Resolver 1.4.2 - no issue > > Maven 3.7.0 with Resolver 1.6.0 + trace. I cant get any indication > about > > 4626 [main] [TRACE] GlobalSyncContextFactory$GlobalSyncContext - Acquiring > global.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

ums.algorithms=SHA1,MD5 (previous behavior) > > * > > https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/commit/3c2a5141c9d393a45bdee873e6aa2c9c275b7b58?w=1 > > But still this wouldn't make any sense. > > Looking forward for some findings. > > Am 2020-09-15 um 22:45 schrieb Dan T

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

gt; Thrilled to see your results. If this works, please remove the property > and see whether the patch along with SHA-2 on URLs changes the > performance as well. > > Michael > > Am 2020-09-26 um 21:45 schrieb Dan Tran: > > I am able to pin down the problematic c

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

without -Daether.checksums.algorithms=SHA1,MD5, very slow -D On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 3:11 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Awesome, what about with the fix, but with the default list of hashing > algos (SHA-512, SHA-256, SHA-1, MD5) in place? > > Am 2020-09-27 um 00:07 schrieb Dan

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.1

+1 none-binding However, I still see random compilation failure at my multiple thread build. I am hoping the latest maven-resolver would make it go away :-) Thanks -D On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 3:16 PM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > this time, I could reproduce the build, done with JDK 8 on Window

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

we are facing the same issue at work (300+ modules), classpath empty randomly empty Love to see some resolution, will help to test it Thanks -D On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:51 PM Falko Modler wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to raise awareness for the MavenProject concurrency problem > that is

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/310 > > > > > > The solution with ThreadLocal would eat too much memory. > > > Reimplementing the POJO classes in Maven and making them thread safe > > would > > > solve many issues in the Core and Resolver. > &

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

ping again :-) to keep discussion going :-) -D On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:20 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Maybe not that many people are using parallel builds... > Imho, the PR should be merged. I've created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7157 to provide a better API > and deprecate

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

ah sorry, the proposed PR merged into master. Can we back port it to 3.8? -D On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 3:47 PM Dan Tran wrote: > ping again :-) to keep discussion going :-) > > -D > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:20 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> Maybe not that many p

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

I think this is the one https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/413 -D On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 2:56 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2021-07-10 um 00:52 schrieb Dan Tran: > > ah sorry, the proposed PR merged into master. Can we back port it to > 3.8? > >

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

Thanks, I will test out the latest 3.8 -D On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:29 PM Falko Modler wrote: > Done already: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/482 > > Cheers, > Falko > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

possible to push the latest snapshot to https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/maven/apache-maven ? Thanks -D On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Dan Tran wrote: > Thanks, I will test out the latest 3.8 > > -D > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:29 PM Falk

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

Thanks, will hook it up with our internal build On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 6:59 PM Olivier Lamy wrote: > done > > On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 at 07:44, Dan Tran wrote: > > > possible to push the latest snapshot to > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/

Re: Upcoming Maven 3.8.2

looking forward to the release. please ensure to have the latest snapshot deployed. Thank you for the awesome work. -D On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:37 AM Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Awesome work. > Well done team > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 4:31 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > I have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.2

tested with my company internal build with 300+ modules. the build time increase by 10%. Not sure if anyone sees the same. but I am happy to take it due to the fix at the classpath concurrency issue. Thanks for pushing this out -D On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 1:23 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > +1 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.2

Hello, I am not able to dedicate the time to do bisecting this issue -D On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:03 AM Eric Lilja wrote: > It's an impressive list of fixes and we are many that would like to see a > 3.8.2 release appear. Question for me is if the particular change > that appears to cause a ge

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.2

Further testing and comparison with current builds, there is no concrete evidence of performance degradation. here is my +1 ( none binding) Sorry about noise -D On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 5:13 PM Dan Tran wrote: > Hello, > > I am not able to dedicate the time to do bisecting this iss

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.2

sounds to me, it impacts any plugin creating a class loader? such jaxws? -D On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:20 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 21:16, Michael Osipov wrote: > > > Merci Olivier for testing. > > Would you say that the change in Maven just revealed this bug in that > > p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.4

I have a concern about the reverting of a couple of Jira fixes. is the real fix also in this release and will arrive later? Thanks -D On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:53 AM Tibor Digana wrote: > +1 > Cheers > Tibor17 > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 2:28 PM Michael Osipov > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We s

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

sorry for hi-jack this thread. is it possible to configure mvnw to use a new location of distributionUrl on the fly? (without touching maven-wrapper.properties) Thanks -D On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:31 AM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > In current project configuration it is a bug rather ... We

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

fix done in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWRAPPER-18 > (showing concrete usage output) > > Is it what you expected? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 9 décembre 2021, 00:59:41 CET Dan Tran a écrit : > > sorry for hi-jack this thread. is it possible t

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

me (see Jira > issue > for detailed description) > > with MWRAPPER-18, from the distributionUrl in maven-wrapper.properties, it > replaces the repository prefix: see the commit > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 9 décembre 2021, 09:19:09 CET Dan Tran a écrit : > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wrapper version 3.1.0

Hi Could you deploy a snapshot? my company repository manager does not proxy staging repos. Can build from tag, generate the wrapper files, and run mvnw on some other host, it will fail if I use the staging RC, but I can pull maven-wrapper.jar from snapshot Thanks -D On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.5

Hello In maven 3.8.4, Maven team reverted a number of fixes (which caused regressions) related to concurrency issues. does 3.8.5 add back the fixes? The release notes mention a couple of parallel build related fixes, but i am not sure if they do address all the fixes before the revert Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.5

+1 (none-binding) Tested with a large multi modules build running a number of times to verify concurrency issues Many thanks to the Maven team -D On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 12:38 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Yes, have a look at MNG-7335 and MNG-7156 > > Am 2022-03-06 um 05:30 schrieb

Quick test at maven-sure-3.0-M6-SNAPSHOT

Hi My surefire classpath contains both junit4 and junit5 providers, and surefire beautifully run both junit4 and junit test classes with 3.0-M6-SNAPSHOT, surefire ignores all junit 5 test class [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:3.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT:test (default-test) @ xxxt --- [INFO] Surefire re

Re: Quick test at maven-surefire-3.0-M6-SNAPSHOT

>From the console log, looks like junit4 provider got picked up first and lock-in? -D On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 9:56 PM Dan Tran wrote: > > Hi > > My surefire 3.0.0-M4 classpath contains both junit4 and junit5 providers, > and surefire beautifully run both junit4 and junit tes

Re: Quick test at maven-surefire-3.0-M6-SNAPSHOT

found this matched JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2033 -D On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 10:39 PM Dan Tran wrote: > From the console log, looks like junit4 provider got picked up first and > lock-in? > > -D > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 9:56 PM Dan Tran wrote: &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M6

+1 tested with a large build running both unit and integration tests in production using 3.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT (not easy for us to pickup staging) -D On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 2:07 PM Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote: > +1 > > czw., 31 mar 2022, 14:35 użytkownik Tibor Digana > napisał: > > > Hi, > > > > We

Re: Upcoming Maven 3.8.6

Hi, possible to have 3.8.6-SNAPSHOT upload to https://repository.apache.org ? Thanks -D On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:35 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Folks, > > Maven 3.8.6 is complete, no more open issues. Thank you gnodet@! > > I'll leave people this business week to work/discuss on potential is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.6

+1 (non-binding) works well with my large internal product build Thank you for pushing this new version out -Dan On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 11:30 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1, works well on tested projects and toolings > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau |

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.8.6 released

Thanks for releasing this needed release looks like it is slow to appear at maven central? [1] -D [1] https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/ On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 8:48 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache

Keeping Plexus component states persisted accross plugin executions

Hi my P4Maven - a Maven SCM providers - has plexus component singleton with states, and I would like to have the states to persist across multiple plugins executions ( maven-scm-plugin, maven-release-plugin, buildnumber-maven-plugin, etc) I think using maven extension is way to go, but not sure h

Re: Keeping Plexus component states persisted accross plugin executions

Ping On Thursday, July 31, 2014, Dan Tran wrote: > > Hi > > my P4Maven - a Maven SCM providers - has plexus component singleton with > states, and I would like to have the states to persist across multiple > plugins executions ( maven-scm-plugin, maven-release-plugin, > bui

Re: Keeping Plexus component states persisted accross plugin executions

ves.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201407.mbox/%3Ca2133e028 > > cf3c18c539eac4d6cf42ed9.squirrel%40webmail.buschmais.com%3E) but it > seems > > not trivial - I ran into several classloading issues. Thus an example > would > > be very helpful. > > > > Best regards and thanks

Changes of Maven Plugins to have 2.2.1 as minimum requirement

Hi I am seeing a number changes to core maven plugins to have Maven 2.2.1 as minimum requirement. Are we going to release them soon? Just curious Thank you for doing all that works -Dan

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.3 Release

+1 non binding. Tested with my Jenkins cluster with master on linux, slaves are on linux, solaris, and windows Thanks -D On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > +1 non binding - seems to work fine here on my various weird incarnations > of clojure, scala, osgi. > > > On 12

Re: Q: plexus-container-default

I dont have an answer for this, but does it work without that artifact? I would love to see that artifact disappear since it also pulls in junit at compile time Thanks -D On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > i have a question concerning this kind of depend

Re: Q: plexus-container-default

any verdict on this? Thanks -D On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > > I dont have an answer for this, but does it work without that artifact? > > I have tested with Maven 3.0.5...for example currently with Maven Shade > Plugin... > > I have to check o

Re: Welcome Karl Heinz Marbaise to the Maven PMC

Congratulation Karl! you are my release guru :) -D On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote: > Congrats Karl! > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Barrie Treloar > wrote: > > > I'm pleased to announce that the Maven PMC has voted to add Karl to the > > Maven PMC. > > > > Wel

Re: Keeping Plexus component states persisted accross plugin executions

I am going back and forth on this topic and its reference, and still not able to get my singleton belonging to a jar to be shared across plugins. Dirk how are you doing at your side? Thanks -Dan On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > So far it looks to me it is as simple

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wagon 2.7

tested by replace wagon*2.6 for wagon*2.6 under my maven-3.2.3/lib. It turns out maven 3.2.x now include jsoup, commons-io, and commons-lang under lib dir, so http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-407 no longer needed unless maven dev remove thosed shaded file when ever wagon 2.7 got pushed into n

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wagon 2.7

, the test fail, which means commons-io does not get pickup by wagon-http-2.7-shared.jar doen work ( even thou I do see commons-io got shaded) Thanks -D On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > tested by replace wagon*2.6 for wagon*2.6 under my maven-3.2.3/lib. > > It

Replacing plexus-archiver with commons-compress?

>From today's maven hangout discussion Just want to let you know Kristian Rosenvold mentioned [1] he did some work on this area -D [1] http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Use-native-tar-to-unpack-good-bad-idea-td5794712.html

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wagon 2.7

check out https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/wagon-maven-plugin/src/it/http-download/ run mvn clean install -Dversion=1.0-beta-5 -D On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > How did you test that? > > -- > Olivier > On Sep 12, 2014 7:13 AM, &q

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wagon 2.7

ources/mojo/mojo-trunk/wagon-maven-plugin/src/it/http-download/target/it/http-download/commons-dbutils-1.1-sources.jar > > [INFO] > > AFICS no issue. > Note: I build a core version with wagon 2.7 artifacts. > So please explain how to reproduce your problem. > > > On 12

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wagon 2.7 (take 2)

+1 tested http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-407 using maven-3.1.x and maven-3.2.x Thank you for looking harder into the shading issue fix. -D On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to release Apache Wagon 2.7 > We fixed 4 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Release Plugin version 2.5.1

Strange M2_HOME implicitly set at mvn.bat/mvn startup scripts. -D On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > You need to set M2 HOME. I have no longer underscore on my phone. > On Sep 18, 2014 3:48 PM, "Karl Heinz Marbaise" wrote: > > > Hi Benson, > > > > Checksum Ok. > > Site

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Release Plugin version 2.5.1

Launcher.java:255) > > at > > org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430) > > at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) > > [INFO] > > -

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >