Re: Why is dependency:unpack evil

2014-04-14 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
a lengthy discussion in our organization :) Domi On 14.04.2014, at 14:20, Baptiste Mathus bmat...@batmat.net wrote: Sorry, coming in a bit late here, but isn't is more a use-case for m-remote-resources-p? Cheers 2014-04-13 15:43 GMT+02:00 Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch: We use

Re: Why is dependency:unpack evil

2014-04-13 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
We use the dependency:unpack to get hold on a couple of WSDL files packaged within a WAR (or jar, zip). These WSDLs the are the input to generate the client site code with jaxws-m-p - coping these files into our repo is definitely nothing we want to do and accessing these files nine via http is

Re: Why is dependency:unpack evil

2014-04-13 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
...@takari.io wrote: Sure, if you have odd cases like that it comes in handy. Seems counter productive to put the WSDL in a WAR, deploy/install it only to retrieve the WAR again and pull out the WSDL to generate your client code. On Apr 13, 2014, at 9:43 AM, Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch

Re: Why is dependency:unpack evil

2014-04-13 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
, Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch wrote: I really don’t understand what’s odd about this case - I agree, it would be better off in a zip or jar (or any other format), but it seem quite natural to put these resources in an archive and have it versioned and released the normal way as any

Re: Model Version 5.0.0

2014-03-24 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
For this, there is already an enforcer rule available: https://github.com/gary-rowe/BitcoinjEnforcerRules Domi On 24.03.2014, at 20:31, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: I see the

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Reactor Plugin

2014-03-23 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
+1 On 22.03.2014, at 22:52, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, based on the decision we have made on the 18. february 2014 to define End Of Life of Maven 2 http://maven.apache.org/maven-2.x-eol.html I would suggest to retire the Maven Reactor Plugin. The last release has

Re: Welcome Mirko Friedenhagen to the Apache Maven Team

2014-03-17 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Welcome! Domi On 17.03.2014, at 20:53, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On behalf of the Apache Maven PMC I am pleased to announce that Mirko Friedenhagen (mfriedenhagen) has been voted in as a new Apache Maven committer. Mirko, welcome on board and have a lot of fun!

Re: maven-stage-plugin / maven-repository-plugin

2014-02-25 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
There is also a clean-local-repository-plugin: https://github.com/Finaxys/clean-local-repository-maven-plugin The user once requested to host/integrate it into an existing official apache plugin, but I have no idea what happened to this idea… Domi On 24.02.2014, at 20:12, Karl Heinz Marbaise

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life

2014-02-16 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
+1 Am 13.02.2014 um 16:14 schrieb Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com: We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009. During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release. I would argue that we should just therefore just

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.0

2014-02-10 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
+1 But I do have a question: should we not somehow make sure new features/improvements are well documented? e.g. I could at least not find any docu about these: - https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5576 - https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3526 - https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5581 I

Re: Maven 4.0.0

2014-01-23 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Would it not be nice to be able to configure such stuff in the settings.xml? and other thing like this is described in this issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5356 (plus an extension is mention in the comments) Configuring this in the settings.xml would allow to have a single

Re: Maven 4.0.0

2014-01-23 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
to public repo. It may actually happen, now that you reminded me about this, but no promise :-) -- Regards, Igor On 1/23/2014, 14:03, Dominik Bartholdi wrote: Would it not be nice to be able to configure such stuff in the settings.xml? and other thing like this is described in this issue

Re: JIRA Cleanup

2014-01-20 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
+1 cleanup is a really good idea! On 20.01.2014, at 18:50, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: +1 with a jira cleanup (but documented and announced to users to let them understand what we do and why) +1 to move to ASF On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Jason van Zyl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-07 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
understand what does not work: did you get a failure? Or only you stopped the publication process after some (long) time? Regards, Hervé Le mardi 7 janvier 2014 05:52:16 Dominik Bartholdi a écrit : Hi Oliver, I tried over and over again - it just does not work out on my Mac - I’m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
/Closing+a+Staging+Repository), but I do not see the repo I expected. My guess is, that I just don’t have the permission to see it - who might be able to grant me the correct perissions? thanks Domi On 03.01.2014, at 14:51, Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch wrote: I was hopping for a drysuite

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Thanks, I was searching for it on the sonatype OSS Nexus - now I can see it! Lets see how far I get now :) Domi On 06.01.2014, at 19:56, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Are you imod? If so, the repo is sitting there. I can close it for you, but you should try logging in and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
HERE…. On 06.01.2014, at 19:59, Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch wrote: Thanks, I was searching for it on the sonatype OSS Nexus - now I can see it! Lets see how far I get now :) Domi On 06.01.2014, at 19:56, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Are you imod? If so, the repo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
On 07.01.2014, at 01:52, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: I don't know if you stop trying this but if needed I can do it for you, I use an external ci server to not block my laptop and be able to continue various music, videos etc... Just let me know. On 7 January 2014 08:23, Dominik Bartholdi d

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-03 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
. The more the better of course. If Windows isn't the right OS, then that's fine for me. @Domi, if nobody sees any blockers, could you start a take 3? thanks, Robert Op Fri, 27 Dec 2013 10:00:07 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch: Hi Robert, I had a go too, on Mac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-03 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
, right? ;) Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:58:59 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch: Thanks Robert, I’ll give it a go, but its gona be my first “official maven plugin release”, so please be patient :) /Domi On 30.12.2013, at 13:07, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-27 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Hi Robert, I had a go too, on Mac everything is OK - but on Win with SVN 1.8.5 the maven-scm-plugin failed to create the repository :( regards Domi On 24.12.2013, at 22:26, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've fixed SCM-737, which means that the source-releases.zip should

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-19 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
let's go. perso I'm tired @Domi I'm sorry I believed if was a good idea to have the module jgit here (but cvs looks to me more important :P ). Anyway we can release that separately somewhere else. Cheers, Olivier On 5 December 2013 04:24, Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch wrote: OK

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-04 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
OK, then you have my +1 /Domi On 03.12.2013, at 08:20, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: No worries. IMHO it's not the problem. Issue is cvs-commons module. -- Olivier On Dec 3, 2013 3:34 PM, Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch wrote: Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time… But is ist possible, that my commit d1f102e5223e5fe0f852e1a5becb497f0e860d6a is actually causing this issue? Its an exclude of some CVS stuff I had in my untracked list all the time when doing a full build... regards Domi On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-30 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
tonight, will try it afterwards or tomorrow with a clean checkout. Robert Op Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:43:58 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch: Thats really disappointing, specially as I have finally managed to get hold on a windows PC and I just run everything 10times in row

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-25 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
: JGitTagCommandTckTestScmTckTestCase.setUp:106-ScmTestCase.setUp:71-deleteDi rectory:52 ╗ IO Even when Maven has finished I still can't delete these files. Robert Op Sun, 24 Nov 2013 19:30:22 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi d...@fortysix.ch: Hi everyone, I think I solved all the issues we

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-24 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Hi everyone, I think I solved all the issues we had on windows with the jgit-provider @Robert can you have another try now? The build https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-scm/ currently fails, but this is related to an issue with the upload to the snapshot repository at