Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-13 Thread nicolas de loof
+02:00 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: Hi, Yesterday at DevoxxFR, Carlos Sanchez, Arnaud Héritier, Nicolas de Loof and me met Brian Goetz and discussed about the objective of JEP 238 and what we could get from such a feature. Having

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-11 Thread nicolas de loof
+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com : IDE support for multiple source trees seems quite far off ? Kristian 2015-04-11 8:51 GMT+02:00 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: Hi, Yesterday at DevoxxFR, Carlos Sanchez, Arnaud Héritier, Nicolas de Loof and me met Brian

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

2011-08-28 Thread nicolas de loof
to trunk (maven-2.x). The changes you did needs java5, but wagon-1.x is still java-1.4 only. Switching to java5 is one of the main difference between wagon-1.x and wagon-2.x The patch should pretty much apply without much changes. txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Sat, 8/27/11, nicolas de loof

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

2011-08-28 Thread nicolas de loof
loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: From: nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com Subject: Re: fix wagon http lightweight To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Date: Sunday, August 28, 2011, 7:30 AM Merge fails, need some rework to match trunk changes would be simpler

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

2011-08-28 Thread nicolas de loof
should be ready to release 2 or 3 new wagon + maven versions pretty quickly... LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 8/28/11, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: From: nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com Subject: Re: fix wagon http lightweight To: Maven Developers List dev

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

2011-08-28 Thread nicolas de loof
can't we use slf4j to redirect such log to whatever logging system ? 2011/8/28 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org Hello Not so easy for core distrib due to commons-logging dependency which is exclude. -- Olivier send from a mobile Le 28 août 2011 10:05, nicolas de loof nicolas.del

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

2011-08-28 Thread nicolas de loof
. There have been lots of changes under the hood. I'd not be surprised if they have also changed the logging. But would need to check that. LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 8/28/11, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: From: nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com Subject: Re: fix

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

2011-08-26 Thread nicolas de loof
I just can't get git svn to work and push my changes to wagon 1.x branch feel free to pick-up those changes if you like them 2011/8/24 nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com I'm testing a fix for WAGON-346http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-346 and WAGON-347 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse

Re: Improvement in wagon-http (use http connection pooling from ASF httpclient)

2011-08-24 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 to set this as default why use system properties to set this flag and not use a per-instance configuration ? 2011/8/24 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org Hello Folks, I have just loaded an issue [1] regarding an improvement for wagon http (the wagon http which use asf httpclient). This small

fix wagon http lightweight

2011-08-24 Thread nicolas de loof
I'm testing a fix for WAGON-346 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-346 and WAGON-347 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-347 Before I commit anything to svn I'd like your advice : see https://github.com/ndeloof/maven-wagon/tree/wagon-1.x The idea to make LightWeightHttpWagon thread-safe

Re: svn commit: r1127427 - /maven/sandbox/trunk/plexus-utils-commons-bridge/plexus-utils-tck/src/test/java/org/codehaus/plexus/util/Base64Test.java

2011-05-25 Thread nicolas de loof
Fun to know we will have to hack commons-io to backport plexus-utils bugs ;) 2011/5/25 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com These were Nicolas' tests, but a good catch and I've made the change. BTW, the aim here is to reproduce the bugs for the first go... so if Plexus Utils is

Re: Anyone want to help?

2011-05-24 Thread nicolas de loof
I'd be pleased to join, (let's drop this dinosaur) Should we setup a wiki page to know who is working on wich part, let contributors pick-up tasks, and trace progess ? Should we clone the svn repo to github / apache extras so that non-apache contributors can help (I'm an optimistic naive guy :P)

Re: Anyone want to help?

2011-05-24 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 and Nike it: Just do it(tm) http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Plexus-utils+replacement

Re: Anyone want to help?

2011-05-24 Thread nicolas de loof
Oups, moved to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Plexus-utils+replacement 2011/5/24 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org 2011/5/24 nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com: +1 and Nike it: Just do it(tm) http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Plexus-utils+replacement

Re: POM 4+ was Re: Moving forward with mixins

2011-05-24 Thread nicolas de loof
I think doing some sort of on-the-fly translation into a 4.0.0 POM purely to be deployed for backwards compat would be enough here...though we may want to explore how we could make Maven smart enough to say, I can't read this POM, use a later version or somesuch... Why only consider

Re: svn commit: r1127056 - in /maven/sandbox/trunk/plexus-utils-commons-bridge: ./ plexus-utils-commons-bridge/ plexus-utils-commons-bridge/src/main/java/org/codehaus/plexus/util/ plexus-utils-tck/src

2011-05-24 Thread nicolas de loof
+assertEquals(dGVzdA==, new Base64().encode(test.getBytes())); assertThat with the matchers is far nicer, but if you like keeping it old-style I'm fine with that! I'm not used with matchers (maybe I should be deprecated and replaced by some nicolas-update-bridge), can you please

Re: POM 4+ was Re: Moving forward with mixins

2011-05-24 Thread nicolas de loof
+1, simple and efficient 2011/5/24 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com deploy new poms as poms with classifier new maven tries to download pom with classifier... fails and falls back to pom without old maven only ever sees pom without classifier 2011/5/24 Arnaud Héritier

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.8

2011-03-10 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2011/3/10 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org +1 Thanks ! -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy 2011/3/9 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com: Hi, We solved 16 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0.3

2011-03-01 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Le 1 mars 2011 09:28, Arnaud Héritier arnaud.herit...@exoplatform.com a écrit : +1 Arnaud On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote: -1 non binding - I had that null version issue earlier. Now home and will try to reproduce it with a currently nightly.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resources Plugin version 2.5

2011-02-26 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2011/2/26 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr +1 Hervé Le jeudi 24 février 2011, Dennis Lundberg a écrit : Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11145styleName= Htmlversion=16232 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: How to compile code using maven

2011-02-23 Thread nicolas de loof
Don't consider Maven as a scripting engine Maven works based on conventions, and plugins use them to avoid configuration and scripting Don't try to override conventions as you do in compiler, war plugin. Follow them and discover how the plugins can naturaly run in your build without anything to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Auto-Mirror Selection for Maven 3.x

2011-02-19 Thread nicolas de loof
I really like this feature suggest, and it would be a must-have if also backported to maven2 ! Having to maintain mirroring based on declared repositories ID is a pain, especially when transitive dependencies pull multiple IDs for the same repo URL. From your schema, it seems the routing rules

Re: svn commit: r1069599 - /maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml

2011-02-11 Thread nicolas de loof
By that logic, which I happen to agree with, then shouldn't the compiler plugin start using 1.5 by default then? It does, since version 2.3, but the version set by super-pom is more conservative Maybe you suggested Apache POM should set a recent compiler plugin version ? Nicolas -Jesse

Re: svn commit: r1069599 - /maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml

2011-02-11 Thread nicolas de loof
2011/2/11 Jesse Farinacci jie...@gmail.com Hi, On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:58 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: It does, since version 2.3, but the version set by super-pom is more conservative Maybe you suggested Apache POM should set a recent compiler plugin version

Re: Create a enforcer-incubator-rules project (was:Re: MENFORCER-19 (enforce dependencyManagement))

2011-02-03 Thread nicolas de loof
. Failing that, you'd have to pull all the logic out into a shared component. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:16 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to work on MENFORCER-19, org.apache.maven.plugin.dependency.AnalyzeDepMgt has all the necessary code

MENFORCER-19 (enforce dependencyManagement)

2011-02-02 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi folks, I'd like to work on MENFORCER-19, org.apache.maven.plugin.dependency.AnalyzeDepMgt has all the necessary code to create an EnforcerRule EnforceDependencyManagement, but I wonder how we should manage such code duplication. Copy/paste some hundred lines from dependency plugin into

Re: Invite Evgeny Mandrikov to join Maven committers

2011-01-26 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Le 26 janv. 2011 09:40, Arnaud Héritier arnaud.herit...@exoplatform.com a écrit : +1 Arnaud On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote: +1 -Lukas Olivier Lamy wrote: Hello, I propose Evgeny Mandrikov as a new committer. He as done a

Re: '+1' vs 'I agree'

2011-01-26 Thread nicolas de loof
2011/1/26 John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org Apologies if my addition to the veto thread was what touched this off. :-) It was a combination of using a phone for email for the first time (yes, I know, I must be some kind of Luddite), I also sent my first mail from my first web-enabled mobile

Re: svn commit: r1062210 - /maven/maven-3/trunk/pom.xml

2011-01-25 Thread nicolas de loof
Can I suggest that such debate moves to the PMC list ? Not sure discussion about licensing and in/out hosting of core components should occur here 2011/1/25 Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: On 25 January 2011 15:47, Jason van Zyl

Re: Use of standards in the Maven core

2010-11-15 Thread nicolas de loof
I may be wrong regarding maven3-core, but AFAIK most code (including some plugins) related to POM parsing use Xpp3Reader, as we don't provide an abstraction API for POM parsing. Such a migration to JAXB (or other), without consideration to the technical beneficts, would require a compatibility

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.0 Released

2010-10-08 Thread nicolas de loof
aren't software and late some sort of synonyms ? 2010/10/8 Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com A week late, but better then most of my predictions :-) On Oct 8, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Thanks god, this didn't become a new Perl 6 ... :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread nicolas de loof
+1, works fine for me Nicolas 2010/10/4 Greg Akins angryg...@gmail.com +1 Ran against all my projects successfully On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.3.2

2010-09-04 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Nicolas 2010/9/5 Tony Chemit che...@codelutin.com +1 Le Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:21:50 +0200, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu a écrit : Hi, We solved 1 issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=16731 There are still a couple of

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-2 for maven 3

2010-09-04 Thread nicolas de loof
Link to migration doc on index page is wrong /#migrate.html, should be /migrate.html) 2010/9/5 Tony Chemit che...@codelutin.com +1 Le Sat, 4 Sep 2010 23:06:51 +0200, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org a écrit : Hi, We solved 2 issues :

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-02 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 (non binding) works fine with gwt-maven plugin 2010/9/2 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr +1 Hervé Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : Hi, what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go! Apart from another few regression fixes,

Re: Fwd: maven3 embedder

2010-08-10 Thread nicolas de loof
just use the HPPT (not S) url http://svn.sonatype.org/spice/trunk/maven-performance-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/performance/tests/p001/P001EmbedderTest.java 2010/8/10 Steffen Stundzig kont...@stundzig.de hi, thanks igor. For the second I need a login. Do you have a guest account or

Re: Aether questions answered for JAX

2010-08-09 Thread nicolas de loof
Do you plan to also use Aether for Provisio ? I read at http://www.scribd.com/doc/29909925/Managing-Run-Times-With-Proviso that it uses P2 for provisioning, but this may be outdated Cheers, Nicolas 2010/8/9 Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com Some more public information for those interested in

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

2010-08-07 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 (non binding) Nicolas 2010/8/7 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org Hi, In order to have a good companion to the coming Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2 release. I'd like to release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3. We solved 10 issues :

Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-04 Thread nicolas de loof
I have always had concerns about plexus being pretty much only adopted by Maven as far as I can see, and essentially being a maven core component, except it isn't +1 Guice allready as its own large community of users and maintainers. It's a general 'purpose' API. Aether is new,

Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-04 Thread nicolas de loof
Ivy Guys could be interested in such a neutral repository API, as they also support both m2 and proprietary repo format. 2010/8/4 John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org On 8/3/10 2:21 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, We have two major pieces that we, Sonatype, would like to merge into Maven 3.x

Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

2010-08-04 Thread nicolas de loof
Could it be supported by a JSR ? Not a lightweight process, even considering JSR-330 was out after 6 month, but the most agnostic way to group community efforts. Aether could then be proposed as RI 2010/8/4 John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org On 8/4/10 10:39 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: Ivy Guys

issue using properties in dependencies

2010-07-13 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi, I just was warned about a strange behaviour in dependency resolution. Having 3 projets A, B, C C creates an artifact with a classifier, beeing configured as a user setting env property (using jar-plugin classifier parameter). Running mvn install on C creates C-1-env.jar B has a dependency

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-21 Thread nicolas de loof
: In issue above MD5 hashes are mentioned, but MD5 is not supported anymore, not on index. Only SHA1 hashes are. Thanks, ~t~ On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:35 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote: I discussed with the author of alf-maven-osecm (that suggested me this feature) and he

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-21 Thread nicolas de loof
I get an error when running the indexUpdater : java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.jetty.client.security.Authorization - I can't find a dependency to this eclipse plugin in nexus-indexer POM.xml This one is solved, I wasn't looking at the correct POM :-/ sory Nicolas

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-21 Thread nicolas de loof
in the nexus-maven-plugin, not the maven-dependency-plugin. On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:39 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to write an alternate implementation of MDEP-269 using nexus indexer API, based on samples found on sonatype blog. I got some few issues : I

[MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-18 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi folks, I'm working on MDEP-269 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-269 - convert a legacy lib/*.jar to maven dependencies I've attached a patch to Jira as I'd like your opinion on the way to support this use case. My patch uses Nexus REST API to query the repository manager for artifacts

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

2010-06-18 Thread nicolas de loof
Cservenák ta...@cservenak.net I don't get it, what do you mean by repository index generated by Nexus ... doesn't include the artifact hash? What makes you think hash is not on the index? Thanks, ~t~ On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:52 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote: Hi

Re: Maven3 with guice was Re: Maven 3 tests

2010-06-09 Thread nicolas de loof
I built and used it also on few projects without any issue, including some custom plugins I'm +1 to switch to Guice, just a note : as Spice uses a modified Guice release, with patch proposed to Guice SVN, should we wait for a new Guice release with those changes included ? 2010/6/9 Olivier Lamy

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin version 2.1.1

2010-06-03 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Le 3 juin 2010 10:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com a écrit : +1 Arnaud Héritier eXo - Software Factory Manager On Jun 3, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: +1 2010/5/31 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org: Hi, We solved 7-8 issues (I'm not sure if MSITE-440 is

Re: svn commit: r950989 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-checkstyle-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/checkstyle/DefaultCheckstyleExecutor.java

2010-06-03 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 to remove this feature. A module is expected to build either with it's parent POM in parent directory or by donwloading it from repo, so relying on such * search-in-parent-folder* feature is a bad practice. Nicolas 2010/6/3 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org Hi, We are two who don't like this

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Antrun plugin version 1.4

2010-05-25 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Le 25 mai 2010 10:11, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com a écrit : +1 On May 25, 2010, at 4:20 AM, Paul Gier wrote: Hi, We solved 13 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11125version=14641 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia and Maven Doxia Site Tools version 1.1.3

2010-05-25 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2010/5/25 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org +1 *2! -Lukas Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, To allow Maven Site Plugin 2.1.1 to be released, I'd like to release Doxia 1.1.3. We solved 10+1 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10780version=15924

dependency plugin vs dependency report

2010-05-21 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi, I just noticed the dependency report has (at page end) a list of dependencies with the repo ID they where retreived from I wonder if the maven-dependency-plugin could also display such (usefull IMHO) info using a new outputRepository parameter Cheers, Nicolas

Re: Concurrency in m3 - a status report

2010-04-26 Thread nicolas de loof
Plugins = I have only managed to find real concurrency problems in the EAR plugin and modello as of yet. Modello is fixed in trunk, ear is not started AFIK. All the other stuff I've seen in the core plugins relate to the plexus-issues. Our jira issue is from a user who's

Re: Concurrency in m3 - a status report

2010-04-26 Thread nicolas de loof
The issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4642, and as an alternative solution we could simply make a list somewhere that blacklists/whitelists/greylists plugins, as long as there's a reasonable way to update such a list. Maybe something enforcer-like;

Re: Concurrency in m3 - a status report

2010-04-26 Thread nicolas de loof
What about adding such concurrency metadata aside plugin artifact in local repository, either by extending metadata.xml or using a new concurrency-metadata.xml file ? In such case users/repo maintainers could easily tag plugin as (not) beeing thread-safe 2010/4/26 Stephen Connolly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-22 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 works fine on my test-projects 2010/4/22 Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com +1 Works for Tycho (although I had to fix a couple of sloppy tests) and few our internal projects I work on. -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues:

Re: Re : MNG-4483

2010-04-22 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 for .mvn and backward compatibility with .m2 if not found 2010/4/22 Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr +1 - Message d'origine De : Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Envoyé le : Jeu 22 avril 2010, 17 h 14 min 15 s Objet :

MRELEASE-261 - regression ?

2010-04-13 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi I get some regressions with maven-release-plugin related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-261 Here is a testCase to demonstrate the issue. This is the same testCase as the existing one BUT the parent project is not first one in the reactor project list public void

Re: MRELEASE-261 - regression ?

2010-04-13 Thread nicolas de loof
done http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-546 2010/4/13 Deng Ching och...@apache.org Hi Nicolas, Please open a new one, note it as a regression and link it to MRELEASE-261 to avoid problems in the fix versions :) Thanks, Deng On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:04 PM, nicolas de loof

Re: m3// and plugins with improper singleton handling

2010-04-12 Thread nicolas de loof
Do we have any top-level jira for thread-safety and // build issues ? I myself got failures in // build with AspectJ plugin 2010/4/12 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com I found the bug in the modello plugin that was breaking /any/ build using modello in multi-modules; and I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.3

2010-04-11 Thread nicolas de loof
Will this change be supported in m2eclipse ? I mean : will m2e detect the maven-compiler-plugin 2.3+ version and set JRE1.5 classpath container ? 2010/4/10 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com +1 Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-) On 10 Apr 2010, at 12:40, Jason van Zyl

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.3

2010-04-11 Thread nicolas de loof
Cool ! +1 2010/4/11 Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com On Apr 11, 2010, at 2:02 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: Will this change be supported in m2eclipse ? I mean : will m2e detect the maven-compiler-plugin 2.3+ version and set JRE1.5 classpath container ? Configurators operate

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

2010-03-31 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2010/4/1 jdca...@mail.commonjava.org +1 Hi, We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=16097 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-7

2010-03-10 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Still partisant of a milestone naming convention to avoid assumptions on code quality and stability. 2010/3/10 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org +1 (IMHO we could change the name to at least beta as it works really fine :-) ). 2010/3/9 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu: Hi,

Re: annotations support in compiler mojo

2010-02-10 Thread nicolas de loof
Would such a dedicated plugin only apply annotation processing or replace compiler plugin ? This may implies duplicate configuration for compiler + annotation-processing plugins. Also consider slower build process as javac will need to parse source code 2 times. (late) +1 for annotations support

Re: [VOTE] Release MavenCheckstyle plugin version 2.5

2010-02-08 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2010/2/8 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org Hi, I'd like to release maven-checkstyle-plugin version 2.5. It's a small release to make it working with maven 3. We solved 1 issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-123 Staging repo:

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread nicolas de loof
could we use milestone as names in replacement for alpha, so that we get more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with alpha in version name. Would you install Windows 8 alpha on your @work computer ? ;)

Re: [VOTE] Release Surefire 2.5 (take 3)

2010-01-16 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Nicolas 2010/1/16 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr +1 Hervé Le mercredi 13 janvier 2010, Stephen Connolly a écrit : Hi, We solved 16 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=14 119styleName=Html There are still a couple of issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Clean Plugin 2.4

2010-01-14 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Nicolas 2010/1/14 Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org +1 Vincent 2010/1/10 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu: Hi, We solved 2 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11128version=14882 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: Releasing maven-eclipse-plugin

2010-01-14 Thread nicolas de loof
Same issue on my project using m2eclipse = 0.9.8 0.9.9 introduce many improvements that makes m2eclipse compliant with large multi-modules projets Nicolas 2010/1/14 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org Can we at least get a snapshot staged with your changes so I can double check that it doesn't

Re: [VOTE] Release Surefire 2.5 (take 3)

2010-01-13 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Nicolas 2010/1/13 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com +1 Nice work dealing with all the trouble yesterday. Kristian On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We solved 16 issues:

Re: maven-gwt-plugin 1.2 documentation

2010-01-11 Thread nicolas de loof
This doc is up-to-date. the 1.2 version is not dedicated to gwt 2.0, it just support this version as GWT = 1.4 2010/1/11 Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com Hi to all, I'll do some GWT 2.0.x application and get a look at http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/ The documentation is still

Re: maven-gwt-plugin 1.2 documentation

2010-01-11 Thread nicolas de loof
to 1.1. 2010/1/11 nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com: This doc is up-to-date. the 1.2 version is not dedicated to gwt 2.0, it just support this version as GWT = 1.4 2010/1/11 Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com Hi to all, I'll do some GWT 2.0.x application and get a look

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler plugin version 2.1

2009-12-31 Thread nicolas de loof
links in left menu are all broken, maybe this is just a staging issue Cheers, Nicolas 2009/12/30 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com Hi, We solved 11 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=12304styleName=Html There are still a couple

m3 alpha 5 feedback

2009-12-02 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi, I'm using maven3-alpha-5 and get a deploy:deploy error on people.apache.org (maybe related to MNG-4241 ?) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-deploy-plugin:2.4:deploy (default-deploy) @ fonzie --- [INFO] WAGON_VERSION: 1.0-beta-2 [INFO] [INFO]

Re: m3 alpha 5 feedback

2009-12-02 Thread nicolas de loof
Maven 2.2.1 deploys fine with same POM 2009/12/2 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu nicolas de loof wrote: I'm using maven3-alpha-5 and get a deploy:deploy error on people.apache.org (maybe related to MNG-4241 ?) [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-23 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/11/23 Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com +1 Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org wrote: +1 On 2009-11-23, at 11:33 AM, Benjamin

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle plugin version 2.4

2009-11-12 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/11/12 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com Hi, The big new feature in this release is an upgrade to Checkstyle 5.0, which brings Java 5 compatibility. We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127version=15336 There are still a couple of

Re: devoxx?

2009-11-04 Thread nicolas de loof
I do, 5 days Nicolas 2009/11/3 Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com Hey guys, Who's coming at the devoxx conference this year? _o/ S. -- Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you suck -- S.Yegge

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.5.1

2009-10-04 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Welcome Qdox update needed for better Java5 support (some generics issues ...) 2009/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu Hi, We solved 10 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=15018styleName=HtmlprojectId=11139 There are still a couple of issues

schema for plugins and assisted POM edition

2009-09-18 Thread nicolas de loof
Just found this article http://blog.springfuse.com/2009/09/better-way-to-handle-maven-plugin.html on maven plugin configuration using a dedicated XML schema. This could be a nice enhancement to plugin-tools to generate an XML schema for mojos parameters as part of the plugin site, to help POM

Re: [vote] Invite Stephen Connolly to join Maven committers

2009-09-07 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Nicolas 2009/9/7 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr +1 Hervé Le lundi 07 septembre 2009, Arnaud HERITIER a écrit : Hi all, I'd like to propose giving commit access to Stephen Connolly. He is already a committer @ Mojo for many monthes and did a great work on several

deploy on apache.snapshots ?

2009-08-14 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi, I'd like to migrate commons-monitoring to use the new plexus-based apache.snapshots I can login to this instance with my apache ID, but can't deploy with this setup : distributionManagement snapshotRepository idapache.snapshots/id

Re: [VOTE] Commit access for Igor Fedorenko

2009-07-28 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/7/29 Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu +1 On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Jason van Zyljvan...@sonatype.com wrote: Hi, Igor has been submitting patches for over a year now and in the last 12 weeks he's been submitting some very substantive changes to 3.x. Igor has done things

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Javadoc plugin version 2.6

2009-07-27 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/7/26 Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org 2009/7/26, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.6/ this links results in Page not found... You need to wait for the sync or to use the asf proxy. Cheers, Vincent

Re: Removal of old-school reactor mode from Maven 3.x

2009-07-24 Thread nicolas de loof
Sure, this sounds like a ugly hack now we have a far clever wat to select modules to be built +1 for deprecation 2009/7/24 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu Hi, Maven 2.x supports a CLI like mvn -r -D maven.reactor.includes=... -D maven.reactor.excludes=... to select sub

URGENT spam on jira

2009-07-23 Thread nicolas de loof
Can a Jira guru disable ouigon8423 account that is creating SPAM issues : [jira] Created: (MBUILDHELPER-13)

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin version 1.0.1

2009-07-21 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/7/21 Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com +1 Cheers, Arnaud # Arnaud Héritier # Software Factory Manager # eXo Platform # http://www.exoplatform.com # http://blog.aheritier.net On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com wrote: Hi, This is a

Re: Stop support for legacy repository layout in 3.x

2009-07-20 Thread nicolas de loof
Legacy layout is still used at http://download.java.net/maven/1/ by some project, including some standard Java API (activation, mail, persistence...) can we expect them to migrate to http://download.java.net/maven/2/ ? Maybe some evangelism / lobbying could help ;) A repo manager can safely

Re: proposal for cleaning up 2.x series releases / trees

2009-06-30 Thread nicolas de loof
Brett Porter wrote: - remove the 2.1.1 version from JIRA and remove the 2.1.x SVN branch - +1 - promote the 2.2.0 as the stable release on the site and push all bugfix work towards 2.2.x +1 - a 2.0.11 release to get those sticking to 2.0.x the 37 fixes already committed there. +1 -

Re: proposal for cleaning up 2.x series releases / trees

2009-06-30 Thread nicolas de loof
for migration, that's all. cheers, Christian. On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:52 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: Brett Porter wrote: - remove the 2.1.1 version from JIRA and remove the 2.1.x SVN branch - +1 - promote the 2.2.0 as the stable release on the site and push all bugfix work towards 2.2.x

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Fourth Attempt)

2009-06-29 Thread nicolas de loof
+1Nicolas 2009/6/29 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org +1 -Lukas John Casey wrote: Hi, I've resolved the issue with plexus-interpolation, reverified the ITs, and restaged the release. The URLs below have been updated. Let's see if we can get through this vote without further

Re: [VOTE] Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

2009-06-26 Thread nicolas de loof
+1, let's have (yet another) milestone before a 1.0 final if this is usefull to release maven 2.2.0 2009/6/26 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu John Casey wrote: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-011/ +1 Benjamin

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

2009-06-25 Thread nicolas de loof
Link to the staging site is wrong, it has been deployed on http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-pdf-plugin/ http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-pdf-plugin/Cheers, Nicolas 2009/6/25 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org Hi, We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-22 Thread nicolas de loof
Just as a side note, I don't thing the wiki page http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.2.0+Release+Plan is up to date with current release candidate, is it ? Nicolas 2009/6/22 John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org I've added this sort of configuration, but I need to document it. I've got

Re: [Vote] Release Doxia-1.1.1 and Doxia-Sitetools-1.1.1 (take two)

2009-06-18 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Tested with the PDF plugin to generate gwt-maven-plugin doc - works fine ;) 2009/6/18 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org Hi again, We have cranked some more 23 issues into this release since the last failed attempt, so now we're at 47 (Doxia) and 6 (Sitetools) solved issues:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-18 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/6/18 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org +1 Tested with CXF and some of the profiles that don't work correctly with 2.1.0 work fine with 2.2.0. Dan On Wed June 17 2009 8:50:02 pm John Casey wrote: Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0

2009-06-16 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 [non-binding] works fine for me, Nicolas 2009/6/16 Reinhard Nägele reinhard.naeg...@mgm-tp.com +1 [non-binding] John Casey schrieb: Hi, Okay, it looks like there haven't been many problems with the latest RC of Maven 2.2.0. So, I'd like to put it up for a vote. We've solved 23

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.7 (take 3)

2009-06-09 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Could we move the assembly plugin configuration to the plugins parent / apache-release profile for future plugin releases to conform ASF rules ? 2009/6/8 Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com +1Thanks a lot for your help Arnaud On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Benjamin Bentmann

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >