Re: Snapshot deployments by CI

2018-02-10 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le samedi 10 février 2018, 00:10:14 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit : > Policy: snaphots from master branches (and possibly long lived maintenance > branches) are deployed automatically. +1 for long lived branches, the version must have some differentiator from master > > Build setup: downstream

Re: Snapshot deployments by CI

2018-02-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
Policy: snaphots from master branches (and possibly long lived maintenance branches) are deployed automatically. Build setup: downstream projects must be build after a master build and deploy. On 9 February 2018 at 13:03, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Write down

Re: Snapshot deployments by CI

2018-02-09 Thread Stephen Connolly
Write down the policy you would like On 9 February 2018 at 12:25, Olivier Lamy wrote: > On 9 February 2018 at 12:01, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Document what you think the policy should be and we'll go from there. > > > > My (current)

Re: Snapshot deployments by CI

2018-02-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 9 February 2018 at 12:01, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Document what you think the policy should be and we'll go from there. > > My (current) preferred policy is: > > There is no automatic deployment of snapshots. Developers can manually > publish snapshots

Re: Snapshot deployments by CI

2018-02-09 Thread Stephen Connolly
Document what you think the policy should be and we'll go from there. My (current) preferred policy is: There is no automatic deployment of snapshots. Developers can manually publish snapshots on an as needed basis and if they require downstream builds to pick those up then they need to

Re: Snapshot deployments by CI

2018-02-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
Perso I don't want anything else than master deployed.. wip feature branch doesn't make really sense to be deployed. and makes our life easier :-) On 9 February 2018 at 07:40, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > I personally think there are a lot of issues with CI