Re: [Proposal] New profile activation

2007-02-19 Thread Rémy Sanlaville
Hi Wayne Yes, you have right. It certainly the best solution and it will be simpler. I also think that it better to use profile just for some cases. I was looking for this feature. As it doesn't exist yet, I used profiles instead. Rémy 2007/2/17, Wayne Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Would it perhaps

Re: [Proposal] New profile activation

2007-02-19 Thread Rémy Sanlaville
Hi Kennedy, Just trying to think of some ways to implement this feature request... I think this is the only feasible option right now. Yes, and it's better to use the Wayne's proposal. 'site' is not a phase, it's a lifecycle. It may be possible to add a profile activator based on

Re: [Proposal] New profile activation

2007-02-18 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Wayne Fay wrote: Would it perhaps be sufficient to add a skip configuration to all plugins, such that you could declare the plugin the parent, and then add a skiptrue in the plugin definition in the children which would cause that plugin to be skipped for that specific child/module? Just

Re: [Proposal] New profile activation

2007-02-17 Thread Wayne Fay
Would it perhaps be sufficient to add a skip configuration to all plugins, such that you could declare the plugin the parent, and then add a skiptrue in the plugin definition in the children which would cause that plugin to be skipped for that specific child/module? Just trying to think of some

[Proposal] New profile activation

2007-02-16 Thread Rémy Sanlaville
I would like to propose a new profile activation. As described in http://www.nabble.com/Execute-only-in-the-parent-POM-and-some-sub-modules---tf3201453s177.html#a8889223 , I need to execute a plugin only for some sub-modules from the parent pom. For instance to generate the project web site. I