Hi Jason,
I had this old message flagged to ask about...
On 16/01/2007, at 8:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 13:10:57 2007
New Revision: 496493
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496493
Log: (empty)
Modified:
Ah, sorry - don't mind me. Looking at the wrong version. I see you've
already done this.
On 17/03/2007, at 9:13 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Jason,
I had this old message flagged to ask about...
On 16/01/2007, at 8:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 13:10:57
maven-site-plugin/howto.html : replace m2 with mvn
--
Key: MNG-2042
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2042
Project: Maven 2
Type: Bug
Components: Documentation: Guides
Versions: 2.0.2
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2042?page=all ]
Brett Porter closed MNG-2042:
-
Assign To: Brett Porter
Resolution: Fixed
was already fixed in SVN. republished the page.
maven-site-plugin/howto.html : replace m2 with mvn
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-360?page=all ]
Emmanuel Venisse closed CONTINUUM-360:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Replace 'm2' with 'mvn'
---
Key: CONTINUUM-360
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-360?page=all ]
Brett Porter updated CONTINUUM-360:
---
Fix Version: 1.0-beta-2
I think this is fixed already
Replace 'm2' with 'mvn'
---
Key: CONTINUUM-360
URL: http
Replace 'm2' with 'mvn'
---
Key: CONTINUUM-360
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-360
Project: Continuum
Type: Improvement
Versions: 1.0-beta-1
Reporter: Yann Le Du
Priority: Minor
--
This message is automatically
]
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r321412 - in
/maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/bin: m2 m2.bat mvn mvn.bat
This was just a dumb mistake: / should be \. I've tested this and it
works.
- Brett
Grzegorz
No, Windows XP. I don't know this syntax, but from my experience
you don't need %~dps0/ part of the command. I tested it and simpe
mvn does work. I will try to figure out, what's going on.
Greg
P.S
You could change m2 calls to mvn ones in all scripts to avoid log
messages
about deprecation
Hi
Command:
%~dps0/mvn %*
in m2.bat doesn't work.
Why don't use simply:
mvn %*
Greg
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: commits@maven.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 8:27 PM
Subject: svn commit: r321412 - in
/maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/bin: m2 m2
It works for me - Are you on Windows 98?
Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote:
Hi
Command:
%~dps0/mvn %*
in m2.bat doesn't work.
Why don't use simply:
mvn %*
Greg
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: commits@maven.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 8:27 PM
Subject
.
-- Kenney
Hi all,
Now I'm sure this is a programming faux pas (and also badly timed
being so near to 2.0 final) but I've been pondering this since the
alpha1 days - what do people think of renaming the m2 executable to
mvn? The reasoning being:
* m2 does differentiate from the m1 maven executable
Hi all,
Now I'm sure this is a programming faux pas (and also badly timed
being so near to 2.0 final) but I've been pondering this since the
alpha1 days - what do people think of renaming the m2 executable to
mvn? The reasoning being:
* m2 does differentiate from the m1 maven executable
this since the
alpha1 days - what do people think of renaming the m2 executable to
mvn? The reasoning being:
* m2 does differentiate from the m1 maven executable, but what happens
when m2.1 and m3 come out - do we keep changing the cmdline?
* mvn still allows maven1 and maven2 to co-exist side-by-side
octobre 2005 14:25
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : Re: m2.. or mvn?
Mark,
I like it! I'd been thinking about this and resolved not to
change it, but we could certainly have both.
What do others think?
- Brett
Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi all,
Now I'm sure this is a programming faux
-
De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 15 octobre 2005 14:25
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : Re: m2.. or mvn?
Mark,
I like it! I'd been thinking about this and resolved not to
change it, but we could certainly have both.
What do others think
Hobson wrote:
Hi all,
Now I'm sure this is a programming faux pas (and also badly timed
being so near to 2.0 final) but I've been pondering this since the
alpha1 days - what do people think of renaming the m2 executable to
mvn? The reasoning being:
* m2 does differentiate from the m1 maven
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 22:25 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
Mark,
I like it! I'd been thinking about this and resolved not to change it,
but we could certainly have both.
What do others think?
Makes sense, but change it before the final release and just go with the
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 02:38:10PM +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
I prefer it too (essentially for the 1st reason). I hope that m3 (if there's
one) will not be incompatible with m2 projects !! ;-)
Arnaud
Either solution is good for me, but should be mirrored
in the shell file, too (seems
19 matches
Mail list logo
