Re: svn commit: r1734070 - /maven/site/trunk/content/apt/guides/mini/guide-using-toolchains.apt

Am 2016-03-12 um 13:11 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: thank you Lukas and Dennis for your feedback in a wiki in general, like Confluence, both creation and last updated date are displayed: IMHO, both can be useful I did some investigations: 4. Doxia Sitetools SiteRenderer [4] says "dateCreation

Re: svn commit: r1734070 - /maven/site/trunk/content/apt/guides/mini/guide-using-toolchains.apt

thank you Lukas and Dennis for your feedback in a wiki in general, like Confluence, both creation and last updated date are displayed: IMHO, both can be useful I did some investigations: 1. Doxia Sink API just tells "date" [1] without any hint on which one 2. APT does the same [2] 3. xdoc in

Re: svn commit: r1734070 - /maven/site/trunk/content/apt/guides/mini/guide-using-toolchains.apt

Hi, I've always used it as an update date. From a user/reader point of view that is the most interesting thing to know. Den 9 mar 2016 08:28 skrev "Hervé BOUTEMY" : > question to old Doxia developers: is date in title of a Doxia source file > expected to be *creation* or

Re: svn commit: r1734070 - /maven/site/trunk/content/apt/guides/mini/guide-using-toolchains.apt

Hi Herve, just from intuition I would say it's the update date, but I don't think there is a formal definition/specification on the level of the sink API. The only distinction between creation and update date that I remember is in the document MetaData

Re: svn commit: r1734070 - /maven/site/trunk/content/apt/guides/mini/guide-using-toolchains.apt

question to old Doxia developers: is date in title of a Doxia source file expected to be *creation* or *update* date since it seems we use this field inconsistently for these 2 purposes, depending on who and when does an update what is it intended to represent precisely? in apt format doc [1],