On Nov. 11, 2014, 7:49 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
src/authentication/cram_md5/authenticatee.hpp, line 390
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27493/diff/5/?file=756742#file756742line390
why the factory method?
AFAIK typed tests need a factory to function. We introduced such factory to the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27675/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 10:35 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27675/#review60977
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27675]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27865/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 1:09 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27865/#review60983
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alexander Rukletsov
On Nov. 12, 2014, 1:09
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27865/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 1:53 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27865/#review60984
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27865]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27494/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 2:47 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27494/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 2:48 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27493/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 3:06 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27493/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 3:53 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27806/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 4:13 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 4:33 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 4:36 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 4:38 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 5:06 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/#review61002
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [27493, 27494, 27806, 27493]
Failed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27896/#review61003
---
src/sched/sched.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 5:40 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27806/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 5:41 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27806/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 5:41 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil
On Nov. 12, 2014, 1:04 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/timer.hpp, line 53
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27496/diff/1/?file=747095#file747095line53
Looks like you need an include for clock.hpp..? Does this compile if
Clock is not transitively included?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27865/#review61005
---
3rdparty/libprocess/src/encoder.hpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27685/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 10:06 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27685/#review61011
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Vinod Kone
On Nov. 12, 2014, 6:06 p.m.,
On Nov. 11, 2014, 11:17 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Can you expand a little bit on why you needed a new async watcher? Maybe
add it to the review request description :-)
The point of this new async watcher is to start to separate out the 3 concepts
that currently use the same event loop:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/#review61015
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27493, 27494, 27495, 27806,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24222/#review61016
---
Craig - are you planning on getting this in? In that case, we need
On Nov. 12, 2014, 10:32 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Craig - are you planning on getting this in? In that case, we need a
shepherd to follow it through.
we should probably focus on just std::atomic if we can. I believe g++-4.4
supports it but a configure check would clarify.
- Dominic
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23913/#review61017
---
(Same here) Are you planning on getting this in? In that case, we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27023/#review61019
---
3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/socket.hpp
On Oct. 29, 2014, 4:57 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [27350, 27351, 27350]
Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 27350
Error:
2014-10-29 23:57:20 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/27350/diff/raw/
[897/897] - 27350.patch [1]
error:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27351/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 7 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27350/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 7:03 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27509/#review61026
---
LGTM module question below
3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27510/#review61028
---
LGTM modulo question below
3rdparty/libprocess/src/encoder.hpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27351/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 7:18 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27508/#review60671
---
3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27354/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 7:23 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27350/#review61034
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Niklas Nielsen
On Nov. 12, 2014, 11:03
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27356/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 7:27 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27356/#review61040
---
Ship it!
you need me to commit, right?
- Dominic Hamon
On Nov.
On Nov. 12, 2014, 7:22 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp, lines 1621-1624
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27508/diff/1/?file=747126#file747126line1621
This was called before regardless if connect succeeded or failed - this
changed here, do you know why?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27354/#review61039
---
Ship it!
you need me to commit, right?
- Dominic Hamon
On Nov.
On Nov. 10, 2014, 11:29 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx_11.m4, line 84
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27351/diff/2/?file=742017#file742017line84
This tests that is compiles but not whether it works as expected wrt
ownership. Maybe that's ok?
On Nov. 12, 2014, 7:34 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
you need me to commit, right?
Indeed :-)
- Joris
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27354/#review61039
On Nov. 11, 2014, 6:14 a.m., Adam B wrote:
src/tests/module.cpp, line 81
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27619/diff/3/?file=755845#file755845line81
Fix the comment
Argh, these rebases are making me go bannanas :) that one slipped in once
again - sorry for that.
- Till
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27920/
---
Review request for mesos, Dominic Hamon and Niklas Nielsen.
Bugs: MESOS-2094
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27921/
---
Review request for mesos, Dominic Hamon and Niklas Nielsen.
Bugs: MESOS-2095
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27920/#review61051
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Dominic Hamon
On Nov. 12, 2014, 11:54 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27921/#review61052
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Dominic Hamon
On Nov. 12, 2014, 11:59 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27356/#review61057
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27354, 27356]
All tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27925/
---
Review request for mesos, Dominic Hamon and Joris Van Remoortere.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27350/#review61060
---
Ship it!
FYI, let's replace all of 'synchornizable' and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27351/#review61061
---
Ship it!
It would be great to document in the Mesos style guide
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27507/#review61063
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Niklas Nielsen
On Nov. 11, 2014, 8:53 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27925/#review61064
---
3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27924/
---
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
Bugs: MESOS-1718
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27923/
---
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
Bugs: MESOS-1718
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27924/#review61066
---
src/slave/slave.hpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27920/#review61068
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27350, 27920]
All tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27924/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 1:05 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27350/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 9:06 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27924/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 1:07 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27924/#review61069
---
src/slave/slave.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27350/#review61071
---
3rdparty/libprocess/m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx_11.m4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27924/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 1:21 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27930/
---
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
Repository: mesos-git
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27930/#review61086
---
Ship it!
CHANGELOG
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27619/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 10:09 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil
I'm getting a new warning with this on OS X w/ clang 3.5 which looks like
it probably should be addressed (Add parens to call the node function):
../../../mesos_public/3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp:1662:49: warning:
address of function 'process::node' will always evaluate to 'true'
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27930/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 2:12 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
On Nov. 11, 2014, 8:52 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
src/tests/cram_md5_authentication_tests.cpp, line 247
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27651/diff/5/?file=756784#file756784line247
bad rebase?
Yikes, indeed - entirely borked. Sorry for that.
- Till
thanks for the head's up - it didn't show up in my linux clang build.
testing a fix now.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Cody Maloney c...@mesosphere.io wrote:
I'm getting a new warning with this on OS X w/ clang 3.5 which looks like
it probably should be addressed (Add parens to call the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27932/
---
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Cody Maloney.
Repository: mesos-git
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27932/
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Dominic Hamon dha...@twopensource.com
wrote:
thanks for the head's up - it didn't show up in my linux clang build.
testing a fix now.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Cody Maloney c...@mesosphere.io wrote:
I'm getting a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27921/#review61093
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27354, 27921]
All tests
22:23:28.150763 12175 slave.cpp:775] Registered with master
master@67.195.81.189:52345; given slave ID
20141112-222327-3176252227-52345-12128-S0
I1112 22:23:28.150784 12174 hierarchical_allocator_process.hpp:442] Added slave
20141112-222327-3176252227-52345-12128-S0 (proserpina.apache.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27651/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 10:31 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod
On Nov. 10, 2014, 10:44 a.m., Adam B wrote:
src/authentication/authenticator.hpp, line 49
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/diff/4/?file=755828#file755828line49
So, if I want to update credentials, I have to kill my Master (hence
Authenticator) and create+initialize a new one?
On Nov. 11, 2014, 8:06 a.m., Adam B wrote:
src/master/master.hpp, lines 583-584
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/diff/4/?file=755830#file755830line583
This hashmap isn't really necessary yet, since we only allow a single
authenticator, right? If/when we do support multiple
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27675/#review61110
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Adam B
On Nov. 12, 2014, 2:35 a.m., Till
I thought signal escalation as per-executor or actually everywhere where we
execute a command info as a subprocess.
The new grace period is meant as the time an executor has to finish off
it's things - changing the other timeouts had to be done as they will in
most cases be shorter.
For custom
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27925/#review61115
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27925]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27506/#review61127
---
Ship it!
Taken this is only a code move
- Niklas Nielsen
On
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Trunk-Ubuntu-Build-Out-Of-Src-Disable-Java-Disable-Python-Disable-Webui/2557/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27896/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 11:55 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27896/#review61135
---
Ship it!
src/sched/sched.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27932/#review61147
---
Ship it!
Mind including a clearer summary / commit message? Looks
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27932/#review61149
---
Ship it!
Fixes the clang warning (Clang probably would make the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27945/
---
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Dominic Hamon.
Repository: mesos-git
Here is another cherry pick for rc3.
commit 99dc04868da8e30ad7d4e733ba5e3573602ce9e9
Author: Vinod Kone vinodk...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Nov 11 17:03:37 2014 -0800
Fixed scheduler driver to not acknowledge status update when stop() is
called.
Review:
Landed. Sorry for the noise.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Dominic Hamon dha...@twopensource.com
wrote:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27932/
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Dominic Hamon dha...@twopensource.com
wrote:
thanks for the head's up - it didn't show up in my linux clang build.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27945/#review61152
---
m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx_11.m4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27605/
---
(Updated Nov. 13, 2014, 12:39 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27946/
---
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
Repository: mesos-git
Description
On Nov. 10, 2014, 7:50 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/path_tests.cpp, lines 27-29
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27605/diff/1/?file=750087#file750087line27
What's the distinction between these three tests? Seems more like a
test of implicit string
On Nov. 13, 2014, 12:38 a.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx_11.m4, line 111
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27945/diff/1/?file=760765#file760765line111
do you also want to check that std::initializer_list can be used as a
type in a constructor for a user-defined
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27932/#review61157
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27932]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27619/#review61161
---
Ship it!
LGTM. I can fix the spacing before committing.
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo