Re: C++14 Upgrade

2017-07-28 Thread Michael Park
Okay, so I tried to test RHEL 7 on an AWS instance, but I can't figure out how their subscription model works and such. Does anyone actually use RHEL for development? I could really use your help! On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:42 PM Michael Park wrote: > CentOS, Scientific Linux

Re: C++14 Upgrade

2017-07-21 Thread Michael Park
CentOS, Scientific Linux and RHEL all have GCC 5.3.1 and CentOS succeeded for me so I expect everything to be fine. But just in case they distribute a patched version or something, it'd be good to verify that it definitely works! On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:46 PM Benjamin Hindman

Re: C++14 Upgrade

2017-07-21 Thread Benjamin Hindman
+1 We care about RHEL 6 / 7, anyone out there that has used a GCC 5 on these can help MPark out? On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:23 PM Michael Park wrote: > I've added Fedora 23 and OS X Sierra to the spreadsheet. > I've also successfully compiled and ran `make check` with the

Re: C++14 Upgrade

2017-07-20 Thread Michael Park
I've added Fedora 23 and OS X Sierra to the spreadsheet. I've also successfully compiled and ran `make check` with the following distros: - CentOS 6 / 7 - Fedora 23 - Ubuntu 12.04, 14.04, 15.04, 15.10, 16.04, 16.10 I need help with: - Scientific Linux 6 / 7 (Does anyone actually

Re: C++14 Upgrade

2017-07-19 Thread Vinod Kone
+1 Can you also add info for OSX? On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Michael Park wrote: > I'd like move us to C++14! > > The following I'd say are the important C++14 features for us: > >- Generic lambdas: [](const auto& x) { /* ... */ } >- Extended lambda captures: [x

Re: C++14 Upgrade

2017-07-19 Thread Yan Xu
+1!! Thanks for the summary and collecting info for these distros. --- Jiang Yan Xu | @xujyan On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Michael Park wrote: > I'd like move us to C++14! > > The following I'd say are the important C++14