Thanks Dario!
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:12 PM Dario Rexin wrote:
> Hey MPark,
>
> I just did a clean make check on your cpp14 branch with Apple LLVM version
> 9.0.0 (clang-900.0.22.8). It compiles fine and I got 1 test error on the
> first run, on a second run no tests failed,
Hey MPark,
I just did a clean make check on your cpp14 branch with Apple LLVM version
9.0.0 (clang-900.0.22.8). It compiles fine and I got 1 test error on the first
run, on a second run no tests failed, so I assume that’s just a flaky test.
--
Dario
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:09 AM, Michael
>
> Which version of Apple’s clang did you try for C++14? The latest version
> available is Apple LLVM version 9.0.0 (clang-900.0.22.8).
>
I tested on
Apple LLVM version 8.1.0 (clang-802.0.42)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir:
Do it. The fewer “officially” supported compilers the better, it’s easier on
everyone.
From: Michael Park<mailto:mp...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 5:38 PM
To: dev<mailto:dev@mesos.apache.org>
Subject: Dropping support for Apple Clang
I'd like to drop support for
Which version of Apple’s clang did you try for C++14? The latest version
available is Apple LLVM version 9.0.0 (clang-900.0.22.8).
> On Jul 29, 2017, at 2:38 AM, Michael Park wrote:
>
> I'd like to drop support for Apple Clang.
>
> With the C++14 upgrade, we'll be requiring
Unfortunately I basically don't know the answer to any of the questions.
Maybe jpeach can help us a little here.
> Is it just a wrapper bound to a particular clang version?
I actually don't know. It do know that it definitely is not stock, released
version of clang. For example, one of the
Can you also tell us a little more about "Apple Clang"? Is it just a
wrapper bound to a particular clang version? Why does it exist? Also, do
you know what the versioning scheme is?
$ clang++ --version
Apple LLVM version 8.1.0 (clang-802.0.42)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin16.6.0
Thread model: posix
I'm all for this! I don't see why this would be an issue, especially with
how easy it is to grab things from brew these days.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Michael Park wrote:
> I'd like to drop support for Apple Clang.
>
> With the C++14 upgrade, we'll be requiring many
I'd like to drop support for Apple Clang.
With the C++14 upgrade, we'll be requiring many distros to fetch a newer
compiler. In most cases it only takes a few commands to get a newer
compiler. This is also true of OS X, where clang-4.0 can be easily
installed with `brew install llvm`.
The