Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/642
@cestella are we still OK with this? I'd like to get it in
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/642
Ok @cestella , I used the Stellar management functions :
```bash
[Stellar]>>> bro_parser_config:= CONFIG_GET('PARSER','bro')
[Stellar]>>> PARSER_STELLAR_TRANSFORM_PRINT( bro_parser_c
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/642
And they do get returned from the rest api stellar controller
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/642
@cestella, I don't see my functions listed in the config ui, but they are
in the shell. That doesn't seem right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/642
Will do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/642
Ok, I dig this a lot. +1 by inspection. The only thing I ask is that
since you're adding a new dependency, would you ensure a smoketest in full-dev
and maybe pass through a couple of records with
