I just merged Raghu's PR into master, so we should be good to go.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Justin Leet wrote:
> I disagree with the hardcoded versions being bad, the obvious concern I
> have being the repeatability of the build.
>
> I'd also like to note that we
I disagree with the hardcoded versions being bad, the obvious concern I
have being the repeatability of the build.
I'd also like to note that we release source as the Apache release
artifacts, anything else we put out is convenience. Say we have a
situation where we rely on library Foo version
I agree that we can have a separate discussion about moving to yarn.
Hardcoding all the versions in package.json is a bad idea considering that
JS world releases happen very frequently and it's easy to miss on a good
feature.
All the ASF projected that I know of have moved to yarn and not hard
Yes, I agree Justin. I think we need to have another (maybe separate?)
discussion on changing the dependency tool set and discuss pros and cons.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:45 AM Justin Leet wrote:
> I'm honestly not very familiar with this stuff, but this seems more like
I'm honestly not very familiar with this stuff, but this seems more like a
"how we use it issue", rather than an issue with the tech itself. Do we
have a more compelling reason, or set of reasons, beyond just fixing to
specific version of our dependencies?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Nick
And I suggest that as a short-term (or medium-term) fix, separate from
moving wholesale to another dependency mechanism.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:36 AM Nick Allen wrote:
> Would it make sense to just 'fix' at a specific version all NPM
> dependencies, instead of allowing
I agree; we should have a long-term JIRA for moving to yarn (so confusing
*sigh*) and a tactical JIRA + PR to fix the build. We should prioritize
review of that tactical JIRA.
Casey
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Otto Fowler
wrote:
> Can you create a jira for
Can you create a jira for moving to yarn please.
On August 11, 2017 at 10:17:40, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote:
Are there any other NPM modules where we are exposed to this risk?
On August 11, 2017 at 10:11:22, RaghuMitra Kandikonda (
raghumitra@gmail.com) wrote:
Ok,
Are there any other NPM modules where we are exposed to this risk?
On August 11, 2017 at 10:11:22, RaghuMitra Kandikonda (
raghumitra@gmail.com) wrote:
Ok, Bootstrap made a release 10hrs ago and they removed few files that we
were using hence the issue. We need to update package.json in
Where are the bootstrap files?
the @import ~bootstrap/….. looks like it is failing?
On August 11, 2017 at 09:51:03, RaghuMitra Kandikonda (
raghumitra@gmail.com) wrote:
I am running a clean install now, I will keep you posted.
-Raghu Mitra
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Casey Stella
I am running a clean install now, I will keep you posted.
-Raghu Mitra
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Casey Stella wrote:
> Yes, I'm getting it locally too, here's more context:
>
> [INFO] ERROR in multi script-loader!./~/jquery/dist/jquery.js
>
Yes, I'm getting it locally too, here's more context:
[INFO] ERROR in multi script-loader!./~/jquery/dist/jquery.js
script-loader!./~/tether/dist/js/tether.js
script-loader!./~/ace-builds/src-noconflict/ace.js
[INFO] Module not found: Error: Can't resolve
Deleting my caches did NOT resolve the issue.
On August 11, 2017 at 09:24:22, zeo...@gmail.com (zeo...@gmail.com) wrote:
Master is failing with that right now.
https://travis-ci.org/apache/metron#L2637
Jon
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:21 AM Otto Fowler
wrote:
> Has
13 matches
Mail list logo