I've been noticing and hearing many complaints about the amount of tests and
overall coverage in the MINA code base. If there was more coverage
contributors and committers would feel much more comfortable making changes
knowing they're not going to break something.
At some point we need to stop
2008-02-12 (화), 23:57 -0700, Mike Heath 쓰시길:
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
2008-02-12 (화), 11:16 -0700, Mike Heath 쓰시길:
Eero Nevalainen wrote:
Btw, what was the status of DNS resolution in MINA? I remember that at
some point DNS resolving used the blocking java API calls. I could
imagine
Hi all,
I'm porting from MINA 1.1 to 2.0 and trying to convert this:
SocketConnector connector =
new SocketConnector (processors, executor);
to the 2.0 equivalent. Since there's no constructor that takes a
processor
count and an executor, I looked at SimpleIoProcessorPool, and tried:
Oh yeah, that's a good idea. We have been stepping on the accelerator
for a very long time to implement new features and improve performance,
so it seems like it's time to take care of stability.
One problem is that most bug reports these days are not easy to
reproduce, which means they are
On Feb 13, 2008 10:07 AM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008-02-12 (화), 23:57 -0700, Mike Heath 쓰시길:
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
2008-02-12 (화), 11:16 -0700, Mike Heath 쓰시길:
Eero Nevalainen wrote:
Btw, what was the status of DNS resolution in MINA? I remember that
at
I can provide such a lab. I just cannot reveal the contributing party. If
you and others are interested please contact me offline. We've been trying
to prepare a high concurrency environment for ApacheDS specifically so we
can share this with MINA. We just need a solid plan for the
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
Oh yeah, that's a good idea. We have been stepping on the accelerator
for a very long time to implement new features and improve performance,
so it seems like it's time to take care of stability.
I tink that MINA 2.0 is the perfect target for that ! Now that 2.0-M1
LoL! That would be fantastic. :)
2008-02-13 (수), 10:54 +0100, Julien Vermillard 쓰시길:
Hi
BTW is it possible to have an ASF machine with two serial port wired in
loop-back for being able to run automated serial transport tests ?
Julien
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:47:40 -0500
Alex Karasulu
I think this is a great idea. As someone who was brought onboard to help
with documentation as well as coding, I would have a hard time keeping up if
this was a full-time job. I think it would make a great deal of sense to
work on this for the 2.0 release, since feature creep should be at a
This would be a nice place for the good old visitor pattern, so
something like, in SocketSession,
SocketSession implements VisitableSession
...
public void accept(final SessionVisitor visitor)
{
visitor.visitSocketSession(this);
}
Then you have a lot of flexibility with the visitor itself
I am not sure if it's a more flexible solution considering we are going
to have more transports. For example, we have serial port communication
transport, and we will have to add a visit method per each transport.
Trustin
2008-02-13 (수), 09:58 -0500, Adam Fisk 쓰시길:
This would be a nice place
I too would love to see a comprehensive test suite for MINA and I like
the direction this thread is headed.
I have been thinking for a couple of months now that using something
like Amazon's EC2 would be a great test bed. (Except that we couldn't
use EC2 to test the serial transport. :( ) It
to example echoserver, how to make this test:
open 2 conection and send message simultaneous? someone did this?
I want to check the performance of the example echoserver.
some tips?
thanks
On 2/13/08, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if it's a more flexible
FYI...if you are going to do this...you are gonna have to tweak your IP
stack to be able to handle that many open sockets.
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to example echoserver, how to make this test:
open 2 conection and send message simultaneous? someone did this?
I want to check
Swet. Lez do it - keep us posted on this.
Alex
On Feb 13, 2008 12:53 PM, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too would love to see a comprehensive test suite for MINA and I like
the direction this thread is headed.
I have been thinking for a couple of months now that using something
How many machines would we need? Is this something that could be
virtualized?
On Feb 13, 2008 2:13 PM, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Swet. Lez do it - keep us posted on this.
Alex
On Feb 13, 2008 12:53 PM, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too would love to see a
How to do I do this?
On 2/13/08, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI...if you are going to do this...you are gonna have to tweak your IP
stack to be able to handle that many open sockets.
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to example echoserver, how to make this test:
open 2
Mark Webb wrote:
How many machines would we need? Is this something that could be
virtualized?
With Amazon EC2 you create as many instances as you want so it would
give us a great deal of flexibility. Each EC2 instance is virtualized
so you're not getting exclusive access to a machine but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin SB updated DIRMINA-530:
--
Attachment: patch-compression.diff
Patch file fixes both issues.
Compression filter - trivial bug
Sangjin Lee wrote:
What I've seen with AHC is that the configuration is often the most
challenging aspect. One metaphor I used is that HttpClient is more like a
browser. Things like keep-alive, user-agent, accept-encoding, etc. normally
belong to the browser and not at the individual request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee updated ASYNCWEB-4:
---
Attachment: ASYNCWEB-4.patch
Moving over a bug fix from the G sandbox. Whenever we fix any issue,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee reopened ASYNCWEB-4:
Assignee: Sangjin Lee (was: Rick McGuire)
Reopening.
caller supplied content is ignored, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee moved GERONIMO-3839 to ASYNCWEB-4:
--
Security: (was: public)
Component/s: (was:
I actually think that's exactly why the visitor pattern is nice -- the
more transports you have, the better it gets because you can elegantly
deal with the additional types rather than resorting to instansofs.
The double-dispatch method calling is also a bigger performance boost
the more types you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568791#action_12568791
]
Mike Heath commented on ASYNCWEB-4:
---
Is this still an issue in the AsyncWeb common codec?
25 matches
Mail list logo
