[jira] Closed: (FTPSERVER-242) DbUserManager Operates on closed result ret

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niklas Gustavsson closed FTPSERVER-242. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.0.0-RC1 Assignee: Niklas Gustavs

[jira] Commented: (FTPSERVER-240) Multiple Simultaneous Connections On Passive Data Ports

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656710#action_12656710 ] Niklas Gustavsson commented on FTPSERVER-240: - We do not currently have a lo

[jira] Created: (FTPSERVER-242) DbUserManager Operates on closed result ret

DbUserManager Operates on closed result ret --- Key: FTPSERVER-242 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-242 Project: FtpServer Issue Type: Bug Components: Core Affects Ver

[jira] Resolved: (DIRMINA-644) OSGi exported packages should contain the mina version

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved DIRMINA-644. - Resolution: Fixed Sendingpom.xml Transmitting file data . Committed revision 726

[jira] Assigned: (DIRMINA-644) OSGi exported packages should contain the mina version

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet reassigned DIRMINA-644: --- Assignee: Guillaume Nodet > OSGi exported packages should contain the mina version

[jira] Created: (DIRMINA-649) The OSGi exported packages should contain the version number of the package

The OSGi exported packages should contain the version number of the package --- Key: DIRMINA-649 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-649 Project: MINA Iss

[jira] Created: (DIRMINA-648) Typo in LoggingFilter-API

Typo in LoggingFilter-API - Key: DIRMINA-648 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-648 Project: MINA Issue Type: Bug Components: Filter Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M4 Reporter: Steve

Re: [We want to hear from you] Problem/Pain area in implementing MINA based application??

Dan Creswell wrote: Last time I looked Mina still didn't have first class support for multicast owing to a dependency on multicast nio in JDK 7. This was a suggestion I made : having a special version NIO 2 based (ie, Java 7 only). That will be a kind of fork. Maybe we can also have some com

Re: serveral questions

Not sure for 1.1.7, but here is what I can tell you from 2.0 Please NOTE that these may not be the accurate answers. On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Steve Johns wrote: > Hi I have several quesions about MINA.I am using mina1.1.7. > 1)If server doesn't detect the session close signal and server

Re: [We want to hear from you] Problem/Pain area in implementing MINA based application??

I also missed multicast support, however I quickly cobbled together DatagramAcceptor and DatagramConnector using the APR transport functionalities. It seems to work so far, as I have implemented an SLP service on top of my APR classes, however i am sure there are still heaps of bugs in there. The m

Re: [We want to hear from you] Problem/Pain area in implementing MINA based application??

Last time I looked Mina still didn't have first class support for multicast owing to a dependency on multicast nio in JDK 7. Working around this problem is possible via broadcast UDP but clearly that's not as network-friendly thus I'd request consideration for implementing full multicast support.

[We want to hear from you] Problem/Pain area in implementing MINA based application??

As we move towards defining road map for for MINA 3.0 release, wanted to collect inputs from users. We want to know what are the problem/pain areas, that you as MINA users, faced while implementation. To put it simply, what can we have in MINA in implementation/architecture or whatever that could

Re: LoggingFilter in M4 no---signature

Steve Ulrich wrote: Hello, I just switched to Mina 2.0 M4 and found it nearly painless. Just one question: Why did you rename the getter/setter of the LoggingFilter? from: setMessageReceivedLog*L*evel(LogLevel) to: setMessageReceivedLog*l*evel(LogLevel) IMHO, the old version is the better one,

[jira] Commented: (FTPSERVER-240) Multiple Simultaneous Connections On Passive Data Ports

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656593#action_12656593 ] Jörg Schubert commented on FTPSERVER-240: - Well, I'm pretty fine. A rough saturd

LoggingFilter in M4 no---signature

Hello, I just switched to Mina 2.0 M4 and found it nearly painless. Just one question: Why did you rename the getter/setter of the LoggingFilter? from: setMessageReceivedLog*L*evel(LogLevel) to: setMessageReceivedLog*l*evel(LogLevel) IMHO, the old version is the better one, especially if you take

Re: Starting to think about MINA 3.0

Ashish wrote: How about collecting inputs from Users on the pain areas/problems they face while using MINA and see if we can address a few of them. Something very similar for what we did for collecting inputs on MINA usage. Sure ! This of course excludes Documentation which is already being