On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:31, G.W.G.K.N. Udayanga
gwgknudaya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Bernard Sir,
Thank you very much for your support.I know that the time to discuss about
the project is now over.
Is it? Why?
But if you can please consider about following
things.
You question:What
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851302#action_12851302
]
David Latorre commented on FTPSERVER-361:
-
We can do this but my suggestion is
Regarding this issue,
I downloaded the common formatter for Eclipse from the website a
while back and (I think!) I'm using it. I use the 'autoformat' feature
all the time so I hope that's the one which should be used for
FTPServer as well, is it? Otherwise I think it would be great if we
defined
On 29/03/2010 22:35, Sai Pullabhotla wrote:
Of course, a Source Code Formatter posted to the MINA web site would
definitely be a plus as I do want to format and still keep the
unchanged stuff as is.
http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.data/ImprovedJavaConventions.xml
Or, go to the MINA
Hello,
When inspecting http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-359 I
noticed that we might have an issue with threading in Ftpserver.
I think we are using a 'fixed size thread pool' with max-threads=16
for the Executor threadpool in which commands are executed. This would
mean that if we
Cool, thanks.
Regards,
Sai Pullabhotla
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Dave Roberts
dave.robe...@saaconsultants.com wrote:
On 29/03/2010 22:35, Sai Pullabhotla wrote:
Of course, a Source Code Formatter posted to the MINA web site would
definitely be a plus as I do want to format and
I don't think that was intended. If this is in fact an issue, we
should probably consider adding a configuration option such as
maxThreads as the default max we choose may not be the best in all
cases.
Regards,
Sai Pullabhotla
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:29 AM, David Latorre dvl...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Sai Pullabhotla
sai.pullabho...@jmethods.com wrote:
BTW, do you know why Hudson is complaining about the test failure on
trunk? I did not get that error locally.
I reran the build after it failed, but still no luck. It runs fine on
my laptop as well. I think
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Sai Pullabhotla
sai.pullabho...@jmethods.com wrote:
I don't think that was intended. If this is in fact an issue, we
should probably consider adding a configuration option such as
maxThreads as the default max we choose may not be the best in all
cases.
I
What would be the benefit of using MINA compared to the traditional
sockets, especially for passive connections?
Regards,
Sai Pullabhotla
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Sai Pullabhotla
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Sai Pullabhotla
sai.pullabho...@jmethods.com wrote:
What would be the benefit of using MINA compared to the traditional
sockets, especially for passive connections?
That we don't get one thread for each one socket. Perhaps this is not
such a big issue, at least
2010/3/30 Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Sai Pullabhotla
sai.pullabho...@jmethods.com wrote:
I don't think that was intended. If this is in fact an issue, we
should probably consider adding a configuration option such as
maxThreads as the default max
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:22 PM, David Latorre dvl...@gmail.com wrote:
I would rather go for a solution that make it impossible to block
FTPServer rather than making it 'more difficult'.
For this, we might limit the total number of data connections which
wouldn't be perfect but might help...
Hi everyone,
Vysper came from Labs to the MINA sandbox.
Meanwhile, we were able to improve the codebase, but it's clear we're
not where we would like to be.
We identified that the areas documentation, javadoc and website need more work.
On the plus side, we were able to complete the first
[X ] +1, move Vysper out of the sandbox
Bernd
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[X] +1, move Vysper out of the sandbox
/niklas
[X] +1, move Vysper out of the sandbox
And when it's done, let's bring the champagne !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
Le Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:41:42 +0200,
Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com a écrit :
Hi everyone,
Vysper came from Labs to the MINA sandbox.
Meanwhile, we were able to improve the codebase, but it's clear we're
not where we would like to be.
We identified that the areas
+1
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.frwrote:
Le Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:41:42 +0200,
Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com a écrit :
Hi everyone,
Vysper came from Labs to the MINA sandbox.
Meanwhile, we were able to improve the codebase,
+1
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 15:41, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Vysper came from Labs to the MINA sandbox.
Meanwhile, we were able to improve the codebase, but it's clear we're
not where we would like to be.
We identified that the areas
Since changing everything over to MINA could be quite a bit of work,
and the issue we have is somewhat serious, we should come up with a
short term solution first and release a patch. Perhaps this patch
would do the following:
Option 1: Have Max Threads as a configurable option at the server
[X] +1, move Vysper out of the sandbox
And when it's done, let's bring the champagne !
+1,
I am going to miss the champagne :(
but will celebrate. Happy B'day Vysper :)
Hello,
I am interested about this project for GSoC.
I've started writing a PoC for this. I want to ask you if I'm going in
the right direction.
It would be nice if the server could handle both standard XMPP clients
(5222) and xbosh (443 or 80). So MINA binds to 2 ports in TCPEndpoint
(for this
23 matches
Mail list logo
