tomaswolf commented on code in PR #368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/368#discussion_r1186889041
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/client/keyverifier/KnownHostsServerKeyVerifier.java:
##
@@ -267,36 +268,55 @@ protected PublicKeyEntryResolver
FliegenKLATSCH commented on code in PR #368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/368#discussion_r1186893876
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/client/keyverifier/KnownHostsServerKeyVerifier.java:
##
@@ -267,36 +268,55 @@ protected PublicKeyEntryResolver
tomaswolf commented on issue #373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/373#issuecomment-1552015749
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. What is a warehouse address? Can
you give a concrete example of what you are trying to do?
--
This is an automated message from the
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #374:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/374
We keep the top-level future of the last initiated write to be able to delay
closing the stream until it has been written. But once the write _has_ been
done, there is no need to keep the future
tomaswolf commented on issue #360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/360#issuecomment-1552027083
Unfortunately MINA 2.0.x and 2.2.x are not source compatible. Switching
might also require testing effort. (Perhaps we'd be lucky, and everything just
still works. But maybe not.)
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #375:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/375
Additionally, handle the case of files being modified very quickly, such
that the last modified timestamp doesn't change, even though the file was
modified. If the modification did not change the
tomaswolf merged PR #374:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/374
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomaswolf commented on issue #356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/356#issuecomment-1553310287
Good idea. I haven't found any proper documentation, but reading through a
number of support tickets at the ASF it looks as if such credentials already
exist.
I have opened
HannesWell commented on issue #356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/356#issuecomment-1553477906
> I have opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24609 to get
some help. Not that we run off in the wrong direction :-)
Great, thanks.
> Of course
jglick commented on code in PR #315:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/315#discussion_r1198363609
##
sshd-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/future/VerifiableFuture.java:
##
@@ -35,45 +35,53 @@
/**
* Wait {@link Long#MAX_VALUE} msec. and verify
elecharny commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-1539017831
FTR, here is a part of the logs I get when running the test with Java8:
```
javax.net.ssl|FINE|0F|CLIENT|2023-05-08 22:21:32.416
CEST|SSLExtensions.java:173|Ignore unavailable
elecharny commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-1539042180
Note that MINA 2.2.X don't have anymore a **PEER_ADDRESS** attribute, so we
have to go through the creation of a dedicated **SslFilter** class, which
extends the default **SslFilter** class.
the-thing commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-1539764637
I was able to crate 2 branches based of 2.2.X and they both work (still
waiting for the CI to run).
1) The old method - by providing the peer address.
elecharny commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-1539039335
On the test, we use a custom SSLFilter which sets the peer:
```
protected SSLEngine createEngine(IoSession session,
InetSocketAddress addr) {
//Add your SNI
elecharny commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-1538929098
Actually, all the handshakes are passing, which make the *shouldFailXXX*
tests failing.
Here is the modified test class for MINA 2.2.X:
```
package org.apache.mina.filter.ssl;
the-thing commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-1539019441
I applied the changes manually to 2.2.X. The peerAddress session attribute
has been removed, which was used to get the hostname for the SSL engine.
2.1.X -
elecharny commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-1540100131
Hi,
I confirm the first branch (_ssl_endpoint_algorithm_) works. It mimics
MINA_2.1.X, using a PEER attribute.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
lgoldstein commented on PR #362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/362#issuecomment-1540575190
> I suggest we publish a 2.10.0 without this change, and do a 2.10.1 once
this is ready.
I second that...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
acho-bacho opened a new issue, #376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/376
### Version
2.10
### Bug description
Hello,
we are using sfp client from Latest SSHD Release (2.10) binaries and try to
connect to a sFTP server through a SQUID http proxy
elecharny commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-1554469397
Will do this week-end!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
beijishiqidu commented on issue #371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/371#issuecomment-1554346083
@tomaswolf
Hello, friend.
I wrote all kinds of test cases, Here's just one example
```java
private static SftpClient sftpClient;
private
tomaswolf commented on PR #35:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/35#issuecomment-1555823619
> Merged in 2.2.X
But not correctly. See my
[comment](https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/36f4e9718d43509d0182b153277ff186148660f3#r114177942).
--
This is an automated message from
tomaswolf commented on issue #371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/371#issuecomment-1555293276
Maybe it would help if you closed the various client-side objects you use.
An `SftpClient` is supposed to be closed when it is no longer needed.
But yes, there is a problem
tomaswolf commented on issue #376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/376#issuecomment-1555065524
`ProxyJump` is not intended to connect to HTTP or SOCKS proxies. It opens an
SSH connection to the proxy and then _inside that SSH session_ connects to the
target SSH server. Your
tomaswolf closed issue #376: sftp client using proxyJump fails with
StreamCorruptedException: Incorrect identification (line too long)
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/376
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
elecharny commented on PR #35:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/35#issuecomment-122769
Merged in 2.2.X
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
elecharny commented on PR #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/26#issuecomment-123546
Pushed in 2.2.X
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/39
Add the most crucial bit: the actual fix. Since Java 11, unbinding may take
effect only on the next select(). Thus there must be a select() between
unbindings and performing new bindings.
--
This is an
tomaswolf commented on issue #356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/356#issuecomment-1555950777
The two secrets are named NEXUS_USER and NEXUS_PW. They have been enabled
now for this repository.
Apparently that is all we need, so we can go forward with this.
--
This
tomaswolf closed issue #370: ModifiableFileWatcher should watch for changes in
BasicFileAttributes.fileKey()
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/370
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
tomaswolf merged PR #375:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/375
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #377:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/377
A SftpFileSystem can be obtained in two ways:
1. Via FileSystems.newFileSystem()
2. Via SftpClientFactory.instance().createSftpFileSystem(ClientSession)
In the first case, the
tomaswolf commented on issue #403:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/403#issuecomment-1677390541
I suppose you mean not the whole mailing list but just the thread starting
at https://www.mail-archive.com/users@mina.apache.org/msg06936.html . Yes,
that's the same issue.
FliegenKLATSCH opened a new issue, #458:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/458
### Version
2.11.0
### Bug description
`KeyExchangeMessageHandler:89` creates an unnamed SingleThreadExecutor,
which is kept open for each session.
In our use case we create
TerraNibble commented on issue #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/427#issuecomment-1934985712
This is also easily reproducible using the including unit test
`ScpTest.testStreamsUploadAndDownload`. Running it you can observe the 5 second
exit timeout being hit.
TerraNibble commented on issue #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/427#issuecomment-1936026984
With some further testing this appears to happen if we trigger the sending
of an EOF too quickly after sending a stream. Placing a 100ms delay between
these actions alleviates
TerraNibble commented on issue #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/427#issuecomment-1936151679
It appears that this is caused by an initial ACK not being processed when
the initial channel is open, then the following sequence of ACKs are not
processed in the correct
jerome651 opened a new issue, #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-ftpserver/issues/34
When configuring the "local-port" element within the /res/conf/ftpd-*.xml
file to a static value, then the ability to run parallel active FTP transfers
is lost, and results in an immediate "425"
stephen-day opened a new issue, #465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/465
### Version
2.11.0
### Bug description
This method regularly produces a NullPointer which it immediately catches
and logs as a warning before ignoring it. Hence, this is just
kwin opened a new issue, #466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/466
### Description
In order to support edge cases with SSH agents like outlined in either
1. https://keepassxc.org/docs/#faq-ssh-agent-openssh or
2.
kwin commented on issue #466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/466#issuecomment-1953022161
Sorry, this seems to be a downstream issue of
kwin closed issue #466: Consider IdentityFile from SSH Config with
UserAuthPublicKey
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/466
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
zakharovsergey1000 opened a new pull request, #467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/467
…yPair() method call.
The keyPairGenerator object is a bouncycastle implementation of the
java.security.KeyPairGenerator class. The generateKeyPair method in class
zakharovsergey1000 commented on PR #467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/467#issuecomment-1955997478
This change is the result of an investigation into the cause of the flaky
tests in Gerrit.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
tomaswolf commented on PR #467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/467#issuecomment-1957898945
This commit message is more an issue description. Please open a bug issue
and explain all that there.
Then the commit message can focus on the change here (synchronizing access
tomaswolf merged PR #463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/463
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomaswolf closed issue #455: Mina's AbstractSessionHelper and BaseCipher are
ignoring lengths returned from cipher update and deriving information from the
input len rather than what has actually been processed during the update
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/455
--
This is
jon-valliere opened a new pull request, #44:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/44
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
lgoldstein commented on issue #450:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/450#issuecomment-1952874876
Of course need to check that result of
`client.getExtension(MD5FileExtension.class)` returns non-NULL value, thus
indicating that the server supports this extension
--
This is
lgoldstein commented on issue #447:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/447#issuecomment-1952881575
Simple
* Remember the last offset that you have successfully uploaded/download
* Re-establish the client connection
* Re-open the relevant file handle
* Seek to the
TerraNibble opened a new pull request, #464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/464
Fixes GH-427.
- Ensures that the initial ACK sent upon creating the channel is processed
prior to sending the payload stream.
- Channel IO streams are first closed to trigger EOF prior
ThadHouse commented on issue #434:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/434#issuecomment-1861694352
Seeing this as well. The EdDSA provider from net.i2p.crypto:eddsa is
extremely out of date, and doesn't work on newer version of Java, as it uses
removed internal API's. Removing
ecki opened a new issue, #445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/445
### Description
Hello,
is Mina or any contributor planning to work on adding the new OpenSSH
protocol extension "strict-KEX" for mitigating Terrapin attacks?
Also did somebody check for
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435252051
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -1741,6 +1979,143 @@ protected byte[] sendKexInit(Map proposal) throws
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435251890
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/config/SshConfigFileReader.java:
##
@@ -256,6 +257,11 @@ public static M
configureKeyExchanges(
M
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435099877
##
sshd-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/config/ConfigFileReaderSupport.java:
##
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ public final class ConfigFileReaderSupport {
public
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435107705
##
docs/standards.md:
##
@@ -29,23 +29,31 @@
above mentioned hooks for [RFC 8308](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8308).
* [RFC 8731 - Secure Shell (SSH) Key
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435111276
##
docs/standards.md:
##
@@ -29,23 +29,31 @@
above mentioned hooks for [RFC 8308](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8308).
* [RFC 8731 - Secure Shell (SSH) Key
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435107705
##
docs/standards.md:
##
@@ -29,23 +29,31 @@
above mentioned hooks for [RFC 8308](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8308).
* [RFC 8731 - Secure Shell (SSH) Key
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435255754
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -151,24 +156,34 @@ public abstract class AbstractSession extends
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435105467
##
sshd-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/config/ConfigFileReaderSupport.java:
##
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ public final class ConfigFileReaderSupport {
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435103523
##
CHANGES.md:
##
@@ -36,13 +36,26 @@
## Behavioral changes and enhancements
+### [GH-445 - Terrapin attack
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435101866
##
sshd-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/kex/extension/KexExtensions.java:
##
@@ -59,6 +60,24 @@ public final class KexExtensions {
public static final
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435106411
##
CHANGES.md:
##
@@ -36,14 +36,38 @@
## Behavioral changes and enhancements
+### [GH-445 - Terrapin attack
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435247929
##
sshd-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/kex/extension/KexExtensions.java:
##
@@ -59,6 +60,24 @@ public final class KexExtensions {
public static
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435264388
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -1741,6 +1979,143 @@ protected byte[] sendKexInit(Map proposal) throws Exc
gnodet commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435094081
##
docs/standards.md:
##
@@ -29,23 +29,31 @@
above mentioned hooks for [RFC 8308](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8308).
* [RFC 8731 - Secure Shell (SSH) Key
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435251528
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -151,24 +156,34 @@ public abstract class AbstractSession extends
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435258249
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -1741,6 +1979,143 @@ protected byte[] sendKexInit(Map proposal) throws Exc
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435260568
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -1741,6 +1979,143 @@ protected byte[] sendKexInit(Map proposal) throws
ecki commented on issue #445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/445#issuecomment-1867726843
Lyle, let me know when you think I can have a look. We are using it heavily
inside karaf, so we are happy to help.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
lgoldstein commented on issue #445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/445#issuecomment-1867740157
See https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446 - still working on it
(polishing it) but it seems promising
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
lgoldstein commented on issue #445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/445#issuecomment-1867739086
Thx - will do
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435249201
##
sshd-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/SessionCountersDetails.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435255754
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -151,24 +156,34 @@ public abstract class AbstractSession extends
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435094783
##
CHANGES.md:
##
@@ -36,13 +36,26 @@
## Behavioral changes and enhancements
+### [GH-445 - Terrapin attack
lgoldstein commented on PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#issuecomment-1867775861
I have also added unit tests (except one) - please review them as well and
let me know if you think there is a use-case that is not covered by them
--
This is an automated message
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435264388
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -1741,6 +1979,143 @@ protected byte[] sendKexInit(Map proposal) throws Exc
lgoldstein commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435249686
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -202,13 +213,20 @@ public abstract class AbstractSession extends
sberyozkin commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435360419
##
CHANGES.md:
##
@@ -36,14 +36,38 @@
## Behavioral changes and enhancements
+### [GH-445 - Terrapin attack
ecki commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435255754
##
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java:
##
@@ -151,24 +156,34 @@ public abstract class AbstractSession extends
sberyozkin commented on code in PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#discussion_r1435360419
##
CHANGES.md:
##
@@ -36,14 +36,38 @@
## Behavioral changes and enhancements
+### [GH-445 - Terrapin attack
tomaswolf commented on issue #434:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/434#issuecomment-1856533066
On the client side, it should indeed ignore unknown key types (and not do
anything if it cannot deal with any of the keys).
On the server side, it should fail if it ever
tomaswolf commented on issue #435:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/435#issuecomment-1856496111
Yes, like plain Java HTTP, Apache MINA sshd only uses the first IP address.
In part this is hard-coded in Java's `InetSocketAddress(String hostname, int
port)`, which resolves the
baiglin commented on issue #439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/439#issuecomment-1851795133
Indeed, in my case I want to apply configuration on per-basis destination
(user@IP:port), so I create many different client sessions and I would need to
apply given configuration
tomaswolf commented on issue #439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/439#issuecomment-1851711680
The listener has access to the session, so it can do special things per
session.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
tomaswolf commented on issue #432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/432#issuecomment-1849071181
We do not have the resources to investigate problems with old versions. Try
with Apache MINA sshd 2.11.0.
There have been problems in past versions in key re-exchanges that
tomaswolf commented on issue #439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/439#issuecomment-1849067063
I don't understand your example code. What's `client`? Seems undefined.
In any case: SEND_IMMEDIATE_KEXINIT = false delays sending the client's KEX
init message until after
dyw770 commented on issue #441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/441#issuecomment-1849363662
Idea needs to add `- Editable. Java. test. console=true` options
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
dyw770 commented on issue #441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/441#issuecomment-1849300309
> Cannot reproduce. Using your code on OS X with two minor modifications:
>
> 1. Connect to my own user on localhost port 22.
> 2. Use public-key authentication instead of
tomaswolf commented on issue #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/440#issuecomment-1849063155
> Any ideas how to debug this problem further?
Not really. Never seen something like this. No other hints in the full log?
I don't quite understand the filtered log excerpt
tomaswolf commented on issue #433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/433#issuecomment-1849070206
Support for PKCS11 hardware security modules is not implemented in Apache
MINA sshd, but could be added via the SunPKCS11 security provider. [JGit did
dyw770 closed issue #441: When using SSH client, the server has no output
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/441
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
baiglin commented on issue #439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/439#issuecomment-1851543133
Hi @tomaswolf , thanks a lot for your reply, I corrected the code sample,
sorry for that, so you confirm what I thought, I found the piece of
documentation about listeners
tomaswolf commented on PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#issuecomment-1870636101
I find this very hard to review.
1. That reformatting should be avoided. It indicates some problem with the
configuration in your IDE or in your maven build. Please ensure that
lgoldstein commented on PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#issuecomment-1871748071
> check that the receive sequence number of the peer's initial KEX_INIT is
1. If not, there were earlier messages, and they disconnect.
Done
> as long as initialKexDone
lgoldstein commented on PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#issuecomment-1871737314
> There is completely unrelated stuff in this change. These things must not
be in this change at all.
Let's agree to disagree on this. My philosophy is that if, while changing a
lgoldstein commented on PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#issuecomment-1871737629
> The command execution timeout looks suspicious to me. At least the timeout
for running a command should by default be zero, as it was before.
Well put - will fix this
--
lgoldstein commented on PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#issuecomment-1871744683
> It does not seem necessary to actively avoid sending IGNORE/DEBUG messages
before one's own initial KEX_INIT. Normally that shouldn't happen anyway. If it
is needed, it could be
lgoldstein commented on PR #446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/446#issuecomment-1871750113
> Protocol-wise, this should be a fairly simple change.
:-) not so simple ...
> I would refrain from any beautification or not strictly needed
refactoring; such things
601 - 700 of 1158 matches
Mail list logo
