ivate
keys containing CR-LFs instead of plain LFs.
O.
M.
G.
Thanks for having investigating the issue and fixed it.
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.
FTR I'm using Docker Desktop 4.3.0 (157355)
On 27/07/2024 00:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hm, odd this is on an Intel mac mini. I'll try again in the AM...
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:32 PM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Weird.
I ran the build on mac OS, worked like a charm.
But I was on my
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
bscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache
com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.13.1
Please review and vote !
--
Guillaume Nodet
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
ina-sshd/commit/50d1d9fd2f4d21a22f8eb978a2e4f47c1349e5bb
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
and vote !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
some indications.
Regards,
Henrik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apach
:
Hi Emmanuel:
Yes: Docker Desktop 4.27.1 (136059)
Gary
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 11:25 AM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Gary,
I had it working on my Mac, have you docker running before launching the
test?
On 10/02/2024 04:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
Testing src zip file.
- ASC OK
-
mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08
2:test
[INFO] | \- cglib:cglib-nodep:jar:2.1_2:test
Looking at it...
On 10/02/2024 16:05, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Could not initialize class net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apac
t tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.12.1
Changelog:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.12.1/docs/changes/2.12.1.md
Please review and vote !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apach
md
Please review and vote !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
Chris
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
E.txt for
instance?)
Anyway, thanks, and congrats for the release :-) !
On 17/10/2023 08:03, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Le lun. 16 oct. 2023 à 22:02, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
On 16.10.23 01:04 , Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
My main concern is that we now need to install Docker to get the test
passing, due
a.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.9.3/docs/changes/2.9.3.md
Please review and vote !
--
Guillaume Nodet
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.ap
And done on the 3 versions we maintain!
On 14/09/2023 10:27, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi!
I did a thorough check on the required N&L files. I found that a couple
of them needed to be updated because of a copyright changed date (the
Copyright (c) 2004- part where wasn't u
has
a AL 2.0 license.
So no big deal. I will do the same for the 2.0.X and 2.1.X branches.
Thanks !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
v@.
Jeff
On Sep 12, 2023, at 5:20 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi!
Not sure it's about validating how others are validating a release...
Now, I'd like to remind every PMC members that in order to issue a +1, the
following things has to be completed per [1]:
"Before casting +1
thout reviewing?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM mailto:jgenen...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot
of stuff
>> lately.
>>
release MINA 2.2.3
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
---
:
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.
MINA 2.1.8
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e
... and Apache MINA Team page updated!
On 04/07/2023 22:33, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Gary has commit rights :-)
That makes me realize that I need to update the Team page.
And, yes, I do think we should thows some meaningful excection.
On 04/07/2023 14:35, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Make a PR
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33
commits if you care ;-)
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (
Hi!
we just have created a Mastodon account to inform the world abouut the
Apache MINA project evolution.
Feel free to follow @apachem...@fosstodon.org !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny*
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Hi!
I'm closing this vote with 3 binding +1 (Jeff Genender, Jonathan, and
me) and 2 non binding +1 (Christoph and Gary).
Thanks for the votes, I'll pushg the releases and announce them!
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.2
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.7
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.24
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com
utter IMO.
Gary
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023, 18:58 Emmanuel Lécharny <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
hi!
WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
This is a vote for a triple release:
* MINA 2.2.2
* MINA 2.1.7
* MINA 2.0.24
Those versions are fixing some SSL/TLS is
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.2
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.7
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.7
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.24
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.24
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36
Hi!
I'll cut a triple release in the coming hours. There are substantial
fixes in them. It's about time to get those version out.
We still have a few important issues to fix, but I'd like to have what
is ready out sooner than later.
I'll keep you updated.
Thanks !
-
currently, I doubt anyone is reading it and it makes it
impossible for outsiders to get started … well … and it makes it hard for the
board to execute it’s oversight.
As I said in the subject … it’s not an order to change anything, but a friendly
suggestion.
Chris
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny
nfig().setIdleTime(IdleStatus.BOTH_IDLE, 10);
acceptor.getSessionConfig().setTcpNoDelay(true);
acceptor.setBacklog(5000);
acceptor.bind(new InetSocketAddress(port));
Regards
nak
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanu
bscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www
27;m quite confident the underlying code is working correctly.
Le mar. 30 août 2022 à 06:41, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
Hi,
got one error on sshd-core:
[INFO] Running org.apache.sshd.common.auth.PublicKeyAuthenticationTest
[ERROR] Tests run: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapse
ache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1079
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.1
Issues solved:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.9.1/docs/changes/2.9.1.md
Please review and vote !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33
Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 5:34 AM Emmanuel Lécharny <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I confirm. I built the LDAP API with Java 11 targetting Java 8, but
it's
not enough.
Fixed in trunk.
On 30/07/2022 10:23, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Seems like it's
I confirm. I built the LDAP API with Java 11 targetting Java 8, but it's
not enough.
Fixed in trunk.
On 30/07/2022 10:23, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Seems like it's an issue with a mixed Java version being used: the lib
built with Java 11 and running tests in Java 8, or something
Seems like it's an issue with a mixed Java version being used: the lib
built with Java 11 and running tests in Java 8, or something like that.
Still investigating.
On 30/07/2022 10:03, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently investiagting some infinite loop in Apache DS when s
/quickfix/mina/ssl/SSLFilter.java#L66-L78
Good question. I don't know... Jonathan ?
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com/
Hi!
I'm closing this vote with 4 binding +1 and one ,on binding +1:
Binding
- Jonathan
- Jeff Genender
- Guillaume
- and me
Non Binding:
- Chistoph.
Thanks for the votes, I'll push the packages and announce the release ASAP !
On 20/07/2022 15:41, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
hi!
e and best regards
Chris.
On 16.07.22 05:30, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Christoph,
after further analysis, it appears that we have 2 countdown latch
instances (exceptionThrownLatch) at play:
* one that is decremented in the exceptionCaught event,
[Count1]>:1]--->PKIX path
on :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.1
Let us vote :
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.1
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.1
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha
.mina.core,
...
org.apache.mina.transport.vmpipe,
org.apache.mina.util <--- here we should have a','
org.apache.mina.util.byteaccess
in the mina-core pom.xml.
I'll cut the release.
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)
key). But that should not prevent you to import it and
verify the signature I think.
Let me know !
Le mar. 19 juil. 2022 à 15:59, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
Hi Guillaume,
qstill have an issue with the KEYS file. Where did you pushed it ?
(I have successfully checked the signature with the S
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/ and added my new key to
the mina KEYS file.
Thx !
Le mar. 19 juil. 2022 à 06:49, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
Just mentionning it because we *MUST* provide SHA256 and SHA 512
signatures, and the standard maven release only generates MD5 and SHA1
signatures.
On
Just mentionning it because we *MUST* provide SHA256 and SHA 512
signatures, and the standard maven release only generates MD5 and SHA1
signatures.
On 19/07/2022 06:47, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Also the packages are missing from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/
On 18/07
-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.0
Issues solved:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.9.0/docs/changes/2.9.0.md
Please review and vote !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busi
long time:/
Just to be sure. (not such a big deal, I can re-push the packages).
On 17/07/2022 00:42, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Yes, I'll do that on monday.
Le sam. 16 juil. 2022 à 10:38, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
On 13.07.22 08:44 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
On 13.07.22 00:20 , Emmanuel Lécharny wro
Thanks for the votes!
I therefore close this vote with 3 binding +1 and o,ne non binding +1:
- Christoph John (non binding)
- Jeff (Genender)
- Jonathan
- and me
I will push the packages, update the site and announce the release in
the coming hours !
On 04/07/2022 23:43, Emmanuel Lécharny
d from May
regarding the M1 milestone?
Thanks
Chris
04.07.2022 23:43:37 Emmanuel Lécharny :
Hi!
it has been a couple of months now that I cut a version of MINA 2.2.0, but
haven't started a vote, because I wanted to test that exception were properly
handled when generated from the SslFilter.
m May
regarding the M1 milestone?
Thanks
Chris
04.07.2022 23:43:37 Emmanuel Lécharny :
Hi!
it has been a couple of months now that I cut a version of MINA 2.2.0, but
haven't started a vote, because I wanted to test that exception were properly
handled when generated from the SslFilter. It to
e latch that the one being checked in the assert, now to see why...
On 13/07/2022 17:43, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Christoph,
actually, there is a kind of race condition in your test.
I have added some logs:
@Override
public void exceptionCaught(NextFilte
isconnecting: Encountered END_OF_STREAM"
and you are doomed, the assert has already failed.
At this point, I believe the pb is in your test, as the root cause is
properly propagated to the client :
[Count:1]--->PKIX path validation failed:
java.security.cert.CertPathValidatorExc
cated
guess. :)
This is what I'm going to check :-)
Stay tuned !
Cheers
Chris
Jul 13, 2022 06:38:00 Emmanuel Lécharny :
Here are some of my current findings.
For the (failing) test shouldFailWhenUsingBadClientCertificate, here are the
traces we get:
juil. 13, 2022
investigated, IMO.
On 13/07/2022 05:29, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Never mind, I'm set up now, and in debug mode. All is good !
On 13/07/2022 00:47, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I'm trying to ran the failing tests on my machine (eclipse with Java
8 and Java 11), and I'll pro
Never mind, I'm set up now, and in debug mode. All is good !
On 13/07/2022 00:47, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I'm trying to ran the failing tests on my machine (eclipse with Java 8
and Java 11), and I'll probably need some assistance.
I'm using the chrjohn-m
9/07/2022 11:49, Christoph John wrote:
Thanks. Anything I can do to assist? Although I might only find time the week
after next because am currently on vacation.
Jul 9, 2022 09:00:21 Emmanuel Lécharny :
I do think we need to have a look at it (and I may find some time to do it too,
as I'm in va
m/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.9.0/docs/changes/2.9.0.md
Please review and vote !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com/
-
with MINA 2.2.0. Could it be that I also need to adapt something in
this regard?
Thanks
Chris
Jul 5, 2022 18:47:09 Emmanuel Lécharny :
I have tested that the exception gets propagated before launching the vote
to be clear :-)
On 05/07/2022 18:17, Christoph John wrote:
Sorry, no. The last message
ed to look into this or was this resolved?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:51 PM Emmanuel Lécharny <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The changes I did were to ensure that any ouutbound data are sent
when a
TLS erroroccurs, because the Alert must be sent no matter what. This is
to be caught in a
filter still don't work.
I recall that you also did some changes in other Apache projects to make
it work with MINA 2.2.0. Could it be that I also need to adapt something in
this regard?
Thanks
Chris
Jul 5, 2022 18:47:09 Emmanuel Lécharny :
I have tested that the exception
I have tested that the exception gets propagated before launching the
vote to be clear :-)
On 05/07/2022 18:17, Christoph John wrote:
Sorry, no. The last message regarding this was:
--snip-
11.04.2022 09:37:30 Emmanuel Lécharny :
Hi Christophe,
sorry, my late mail was off
Hi Christoph,
yes. I guess you tested it already.
On 05/07/2022 09:38, Christoph John wrote:
Hi Emmanuel
Did you manage to fix the bug which we talked about in the mail thread from May
regarding the M1 milestone?
Thanks
Chris
04.07.2022 23:43:37 Emmanuel Lécharny :
Hi!
it has been a
Ah, sorry, copy/paste error:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1070/
On 05/07/2022 08:02, Jeff MAURY wrote:
Staging repo is not available
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 11:43 PM Emmanuel Lécharny <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi!
it has been
ilable for download on :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.0
Let us vote :
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.0
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.0
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emma
Hi Jonathan,
I see that you added the LINK, UNLINK methods in the HttpMehod class on
March, 25, 2018, and that's fine. But where is teh WRAPPED method coming
from ? I can't find out the root for this method.
Thanks !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 N
Hi !
Just wondering if anyone has ever used this module. To me, it seems
*really* like a proof of concept.
Thanks !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com
t in a
DisableEncryptWriteRequest. This guarantees that ONLY that message
bypasses the SslFilter
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any
attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information
Super, thanks Gregory !
On 11/04/2022 15:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All:
I enabled GitHub Actions builds which will give us quick feedback on PRs as
well as sanity checks for building and testing on Java LTS versions.
See https://github.com/apache/mina-ftpserver/actions
Gary
--
*Emmanuel
exception to the IoAdapter when the SSLEngine throw it).
I'll keep you inform...
On 09/04/2022 00:26, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
I will start to cut a first milestone for the MINA 2.2.X branch. It has
been tested on Apache Ftpserver, Ldap API and Directory Server with
succes
s ago but seem to
have lost track of the mail thread.
Thanks in advance,
Chris.
On 09.04.22 00:26, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
I will start to cut a first milestone for the MINA 2.2.X branch. It
has been tested on Apache Ftpserver, Ldap API and Directory Server
with success.
There will pro
this with Jonathan some months ago but seem to
have lost track of the mail thread.
Thanks in advance,
Chris.
On 09.04.22 00:26, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
I will start to cut a first milestone for the MINA 2.2.X branch. It
has been tested on Apache Ftpserver, Ldap API and Directory Se
- the removal of the SslFilter.DISABLE_ENCRYPTION_ONCE attribute, which
is either replaced by a dedicated filter, or the encapsulation of the
message in a DisableEncryptWriteRequest interface
I'll do that this week-end.
Thanks !
--
*Emmanuel Léc
Ok, tested MINA 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT with FtpServer, Apache LDAP API and
Apache Directoryserver, all is good.
May we cut a milestone ?
On 01/04/2022 18:56, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Yu didn't cause any problem. This is just a bug, anybody could have been
caught by this one. I didn't expec
need to trigger this manually?
Thanks
Am 1. April 2022 18:56:35 MESZ schrieb "Emmanuel Lécharny"
:
Yu didn't cause any problem. This is just a bug, anybody could have
been
caught by this one. I didn't expect that the state would be squashed if
you apply both NEED and WANT fl
onus !
On 01/04/2022 18:42, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Did I cause that problem because I remember there being a bug request
because we weren’t applying the Need and Want from the Impl config.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 10:55 AM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
Got it !!!
What a nasty bug it was...
The n
hich only call the proper setting. Of course, if you set both to true,
you'll end with NEED, which is just fine.
On 01/04/2022 16:18, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Some progress:
With MINA 2.1.5, the SSLEngine.SSLConfiguration instance has the
clientAuthType set to CLIENT_AUTH_REQUIRED, while
y set...
On 01/04/2022 11:06, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Still fighting...
When using MINA 2.1.6, I see that the client (FTPSCLient, a java class
that is not using MINA) sends a client Certificate to the server after
having received a CertificateRequest:
javax.net.ssl|FINE|01|main|2022-04-01
fore" : "2021-02-26 02:15:32.000 CET",
"not after" : "2031-02-26 02:15:32.000 CET",
"subject": "CN=ftpclient",
"subject public key" : "RSA"}
]
)
...
With MINA 2.2.0, I don't see any Ce
ecause I
broke StartTLS (which our test depends on)
Most certainly it's broken because of teh lack of clear text response
before the filter is set. See the added filter upper.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 3:37 PM Emmanuel Lécharny <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Guus,
Ok, pb fixed with an added filter.
Now, I still get a NPE while trying to access the peerCertificate from
the session, even after the Handshake has been completed...
On 30/03/2022 18:02, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
no, it's just that we try to send a clear text message
f the filter chain and not some message generator.
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com/
-
To unsubscri
... which is not that easy :/
I guess I have to use a dedicated filter once again for that purpose.
On 30/03/2022 18:02, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
no, it's just that we try to send a clear text message after having set
the SSLFilter, pretty much as what we had to workarou
emits the connected
after the handshake completes? If you do it too early it won’t populate.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 2:33 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
Hi!
following the effort put in rewriting the Sslfilter (and all the inner
code) by Jonathan lately, I would like to know if we could mive forwa
do on FtpServer to have it working
with 2.2.X, we get some NPE when trying to fetch the peer certificate
from the SSLSession (for some unkown reason, when I call
sslSession.getPeerCertiticate() it returns null).
Wdyt ?
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0
Hi Gary,
we are pleased to inform you that you have been granted commit access to
the MINA project.
FTR, Gary is a long time Apache member (back to 2008 AFAIR), and is
active on commons, loogins and xalan Apache project.
Many thanks !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais
Hi Gary,
this is a working branch in which some classes have been renamed from
SslXXX to SSLXXX, and this commit is moving back to the previous names,
exactly for the reason you mention...
So I guess you will approve this comit :-)
On 15/03/2022 14:41, Gary Gregory wrote:
You can't rename p
tpserver/1.1.4/
1.2.0: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/ftpserver/1.2.0/
Let us vote :
[ ] +1 | Release Apache FtpServer 1.1.4 and 1.2.0
[ ] +/- | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release Apache FtpServer 1.1.4 and 1.2.0
Thanks !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 062
ndenc on the
latest Log4j2.17.2.
I'll start the release soon today.
Thanks !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.
27;s now clear for me and this thread can die :-)
On 03/03/2022 02:31, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
I was using an Executor to limit the number of threads that consume this
action to prevent the server from an SSL attack spinning on all the codes.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 6:43 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrot
= engineInstance;
}
@Override
public void run() {
synchronized (engine) { <<-- This...
Whatever we do, when a task is executed, it will block any other
DelegatedTask.
On 02/03/2022 15:33, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
On 02/03/2022 13:57, Jonathan Valliere
, 2022 at 7:33 AM Emmanuel Lécharny <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 02/03/2022 12:36, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
> It’s already running in an Executor
Can you clarify ? What is running in an executor?
The SSLEngine delegated task is run in a thread pool executo
at is
going to be problematic, when the tasks are supposed to be ran concurrently.
Am I missing something ?
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 3:51 AM Emmanuel Lécharny <mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
an alternative would be to modify the execute_task method to become:
.
On 02/03/2022 07:05, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
I wonder if using an executor to process SSLEngine tasks is useful at
all, considering that the execute_task method is synchronized:
protected void schedule_task(NextFilter next) {
if (ENABLE_ASYNC_TASKS) {
or in the equation, it should be
done in the execute_task method, not in the schedule_task, it would
speed up the TLS processing, while also freeing the main thread fast
enough - even a bit slower than having the task loop being processed by
a dedicated thread.
wdyt?
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO
1 - 100 of 1053 matches
Mail list logo
