Thrameos commented on PR #314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/314#issuecomment-1397660577
For reference here is the log with this code being exercised.
```
2023/01/19 13:52:38,097 [sshd-SftpSubsystem-61352-thread-1] DEBUG
SftpSubsystem -
Thrameos commented on code in PR #314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/314#discussion_r1081905234
##
sshd-sftp/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/sftp/server/AbstractSftpSubsystemHelper.java:
##
@@ -338,6 +338,9 @@ protected void process(Buffer buffer) throws
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #315:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/315
Implement cancellation of futures such that cancelling a user-visible future
also cancels the underlying internal operation. Since cancellations can be
asynchronous, introduce the concept of a
tomaswolf merged PR #308:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/308
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomaswolf closed issue #302: requestNewKeysExchange may cause
KeyExchangeMessageHandler into dead lock,cpu 100%
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/302
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
tomaswolf commented on code in PR #314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/314#discussion_r1081679988
##
sshd-sftp/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/sftp/server/AbstractSftpSubsystemHelper.java:
##
@@ -338,6 +338,9 @@ protected void process(Buffer buffer) throws
Thrameos commented on issue #313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/313#issuecomment-1397427750
I gave it a shot. I am not sure what information is needed to identify the
source. I put the session and the id assuming that it matches the other calls.
--
This is an
Thrameos opened a new pull request, #314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/314
Fixes #313
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
tomaswolf commented on issue #313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/313#issuecomment-1396564724
There is debug logging in
MiniTaT commented on issue #312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/312#issuecomment-1396385975
>
We can't go to the customer site to check, so we'll contact the customer to
try "netsh winsock reset"。
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
Thrameos opened a new issue, #313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/313
### Version
2.9.3
### Bug description
While trying to implement a virtual file system for SFTPD, I ran into a
condition in which the connection would close but there was nothing in
tomaswolf commented on issue #312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/312#issuecomment-1387539730
You could also try using a later Java version. Try Java 11 or 17, or maybe
even 19.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
tomaswolf commented on issue #312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/312#issuecomment-1385419758
The error message appears to indicate that this is Windows error 10038 ("An
operation was attempted on something that is not a socket."). Searching the
Internet for "OS 10038" or
MiniTaT commented on issue #312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/312#issuecomment-1385163955
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
MiniTaT opened a new issue, #312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/312
### Version
2.9.2
### Bug description
Recently, we switched from jsch to mina ssh. In some of our customers'
environments, we encountered the following error when connecting to the
garyiscoding commented on issue #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/310#issuecomment-1385029023
long openChannelTimeout = 500L;
try (ChannelExec channel = session.createExecChannel(command);
ByteArrayOutputStream outputStream =
garyiscoding commented on issue #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/310#issuecomment-1385028394
`long openChannelTimeout = 500L;
try (ChannelExec channel = session.createExecChannel(command);
ByteArrayOutputStream outputStream =
garyiscoding commented on issue #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/310#issuecomment-1385028733
`long openChannelTimeout = 500L;
try (ChannelExec channel = session.createExecChannel(command);
ByteArrayOutputStream outputStream =
garyiscoding commented on issue #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/310#issuecomment-1385023724
When the service is first deployed, there is no error. After running for a
while, this error occurs
tomaswolf commented on issue #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/310#issuecomment-1384481173
From looking at where this exception is created, it seems that it indicates
a failure in TCP/IP port fowarding to connect to the requested external port.
--
This is an automated
tomaswolf commented on issue #311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/311#issuecomment-1384457928
We wrote in the [CVE
announcement](https://www.mail-archive.com/users@mina.apache.org/msg06948.html),
also [linked at the
4devwithgit opened a new issue, #311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/311
### Version
2.7.0
### Bug description
This is in regards to the security vulnerability,
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-45047
In our code implementation for
garyiscoding opened a new issue, #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/310
Hello, may I ask what will cause the failure to open the channel? Is this
the exception caught in the log
org.apache.sshd.common.SshException: DefaultOpenFuture[ChannelExec[id=123,
garyiscoding closed issue #306: Client startup sometimes take a long time
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/306
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
Ingo13F commented on issue #309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/309#issuecomment-1378550899
Ah, yes sure. That's more of a wording issue then. I concur: The code from
jGit for proxy handling should somehow make its way into MINA SSHD and all is
good.
--
This is an
Ingo13F commented on issue #309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/309#issuecomment-1378490095
If I see this correctly this would be accomplished by subclassing SshClient
and overwriting the connect method as well as implementing the ProxyConnectors.
In my opinion, this is
tomaswolf commented on issue #309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/309#issuecomment-1378337756
It is possible to connect via HTTP or SOCKS proxies with Apache MINA sshd.
But the library does not provide this feature out of the box; users have to
write their own code.
Ingo13F opened a new issue, #309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/309
### Description
I am using MINA SSHD as part of Spring Integration 6.0.1 since it replaced
the JSch SSH implementation there.
However I was using a HTTP proxy to connect with JSch and this seems
tomaswolf commented on issue #302:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/302#issuecomment-1376388012
@zmrush can you give #308 a try? I think that should avoid this endless loop.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #308:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/308
If there is an exception during KEX that causes the SSH session to be
closed, fail any further write attempts by throwing an SshException.
Otherwise KeyExchangeMessageHandler.writeOrEnqueue()
tomaswolf closed issue #293: Performance problems in tests (NIO2 and MINA,
Linux only)
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/293
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
tomaswolf merged PR #307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/307
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomaswolf commented on issue #293:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/293#issuecomment-1374645896
The problem in SFTP is caused by excessively jumping back and forth in the
file on the server side. It manifests only with NIO2 and MINA but not with
Netty because timing is
jon-valliere closed pull request #25: DIRMINA-1124 : make NioProcessor and
NioSocketAcceptor extendable by removing final from class declaration
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/25
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
jon-valliere commented on PR #25:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/25#issuecomment-1374629832
Closing because the patch was merged into main on
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mina.git;a=commit;h=53d96b92d4bf14fad2b87d8fdeca4ebc5019b6d8
--
This is an automated message from
jon-valliere merged PR #33:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/33
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
jon-valliere merged PR #37:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/37
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
jon-valliere commented on PR #37:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/37#issuecomment-1374624355
I take it back, since the `position()` is used when writing, it makes sense
not to move the pointer.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
jon-valliere commented on PR #37:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/37#issuecomment-1374621868
I spent the last 10 minutes trying to find the source code for `sendb`. The
only thing I can find is the JNI definition for the function. Usually when a
function takes in a `ByteBuffer`
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/307
If a client uses an SFTP buffer size greater than the maximum amount of data
the server is willing to return for an individual read request, data will be
delivered with "holes". For instance, if
subes opened a new pull request, #37:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina/pull/37
fixes an endless loop when writing a direct buffer in APR
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
tomaswolf closed issue #283: Client:Sent SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST twice even
PASSWORD_PROMPTS=1
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/283
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
tomaswolf merged PR #284:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/284
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomaswolf commented on issue #306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/306#issuecomment-1369844383
Keeping the client open is certainly faster, but re-creating clients is also
possible. JGit does so, for instance, and we never got any complaints. To find
out why recreating
garyiscoding commented on issue #306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/306#issuecomment-1369729305
> 9783ms is 9.783s, not 90s.
>
> It is impossible to answer this question from the information given. Might
be anything, like the JVM having to load classes first, or
garyiscoding closed issue #306: Client startup sometimes take a long time
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/306
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
garyiscoding commented on issue #306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/306#issuecomment-1369720307
> 9783ms is 9.783s, not 90s.
>
> It is impossible to answer this question from the information given. Might
be anything, like the JVM having to load classes first, or
tomaswolf commented on issue #306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/306#issuecomment-1369586061
9783ms is 9.783s, not 90s.
It is impossible to answer this question from the information given. Might
be anything, like the JVM having to load classes first, or garbage
garyiscoding opened a new issue, #306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/306
### Version
2.9.2
### Bug description
Sometimes the client starts quickly and sometimes slowly.
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
client =
tomaswolf commented on issue #293:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/293#issuecomment-1369168078
This is also reproducible for me in a CentOS 7 virtual machine running
locally. From the logs I see that with NIO2 and MINA, there is a 40ms delay for
getting these extra 1kB
tomaswolf commented on issue #283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/283#issuecomment-1369166287
Absent an answer, I've pushed a fix to PR #284. It implements
`CoreModuleProperties.PASSWORD_PROMPTS`as the equivalent of the OpenSSH config
`NumberOfPasswordPrompts`. Only
tomaswolf closed issue #300: The variable sender of channelOpenConfirmation is
possibly negative
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/300
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
tomaswolf merged PR #305:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/305
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #305:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/305
Fix reading the id from the message, and add a test in which the server uses
artificially high channel IDs beyond Integer.MAX_VALUE.
Fixes #300.
--
This is an automated message from the
tomaswolf closed issue #298: Server side heartbeat not working
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/298
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
tomaswolf merged PR #303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/303
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
cl728 closed issue #304: How to disable the warning "Server at preseneted
unverfied EC key"
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/304
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
cl728 opened a new issue, #304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/304
### Version
2.7.0
### Bug description
every time when the program connects to the remote host using
apache-mina-sshd will print the WARN log like "Server at xxx presented
unverfied EC
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/303
Services need to be started. In particular, the connection service starts
its heartbeat, if configured, when started. It was already noticed in commit
e74e2041 that the server-side did not start
tomaswolf commented on issue #298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/298#issuecomment-1365428807
Indeed; you're right. It looks like this never worked, and was not caught
because there was no test for server-side heartbeats.
--
This is an automated message from the
thevipwan commented on issue #298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/298#issuecomment-1364823374
switch to version 2.9.2 but still not work；I use debug log and
Wireshark(Capture port traffic) monitor heartbeat，I'm so confused about it, can
you give me correct example code?
tomaswolf closed issue #297: SSHD Client failing on private key file with key
password
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/297
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
tomaswolf merged PR #299:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/299
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
zmrush commented on issue #302:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/302#issuecomment-1364450878
> Not enough information. Please provide full jstack traces as text file. If
you have some code that can reproduce the behavior reliably that would also be
helpful.
>
> With
zmrush commented on issue #302:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/302#issuecomment-1364450488
it happens occasionally,not always.i guess that when we write packet, the
thread is in requestNewKeysExchange,so kexDone not fulfilled and the thread
goes into "block =
tomaswolf commented on issue #302:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/302#issuecomment-1364179109
Not enough information. Please provide full jstack traces as text file. If
you have some code that can reproduce the behavior reliably that would also be
helpful.
With just
zmrush commented on issue #302:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/302#issuecomment-1363931090
. I didn't see
immediately how to do that.
ThanasisBarekas opened a new issue, #296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/296
Hello,
Is it possible to create a read only VirtualFileSystemFactory ? if yes can
you please share an example ?
Thank you,
Thanasis
--
This is an automated message from the
tomaswolf commented on code in PR #295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/295#discussion_r1053561160
##
sshd-sftp/src/test/java/org/apache/sshd/sftp/client/fs/SftpFileSystemTest.java:
##
@@ -87,6 +89,7 @@
import org.junit.runners.MethodSorters;
import
tomaswolf commented on code in PR #295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/295#discussion_r1053192599
##
sshd-sftp/src/test/java/org/apache/sshd/sftp/client/fs/SftpFileSystemTest.java:
##
@@ -87,6 +89,7 @@
import org.junit.runners.MethodSorters;
import
tomaswolf commented on PR #242:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/242#issuecomment-1359155156
I can't promise anything. All the maintainers in this project are unpaid
volunteers doing this in their spare time. I wrote in October I'd be working on
this, and I am, but progress
onyas commented on PR #242:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/242#issuecomment-1358715900
Is there any possibility to release it early next year? our customer is
eager to get this fixed. If not, can you provide any plan so that we can set
the expectation for the customer.
tomaswolf commented on issue #294:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/294#issuecomment-1358527146
Thanks for pointing out this bug. It should be fixed by the referenced pull
request.
But personally I'm not convinced using a ThreadLocal to store these wrappers
is a good
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/295
SftpFileSystem.getClient() returns reference-counted wrapper instances that
need to be closed to avoid a memory leak via ThreadLocals. Make sure that the
streams returned by
tomaswolf merged PR #292:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/292
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
luchenguang commented on issue #294:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/294#issuecomment-1357686187
Meet the same question when using SftpFileSystem, seems to be caused by
SftpFileSystem using a ThreadLocal to cache a sftp client but unable to clear it
--
This is an
sparkchans opened a new issue, #294:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/294
### Version
master
### Bug description
The newInputStream and newOutputStream methods of SftpFileSystemProvider
call the SftpFileSystem#getClient() method without call the close()
tomaswolf commented on issue #293:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/293#issuecomment-1356404731
Partial problem cause: in the **SftpTransferTest**, the problem is the SFTP
buffer size of 64kB in `testTransferIntegrityWithBufferLargerThanPacket`. That
is 1kB more than the
tomaswolf opened a new issue, #293:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/293
Looking through the GitHub build logs, there seems to be a problem with two
tests on Linux, with the NIO2 or MINA transport back-ends. They show very poor
performance:
1 - 100 of 1791 matches
Mail list logo
