[jira] [Assigned] (MNEMONIC-363) Missing mnemonic-query module in source-assembly.xml

2017-08-31 Thread Wang, Gang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wang, Gang reassigned MNEMONIC-363: --- Assignee: Wang, Gang > Missing mnemonic-query module in source-assembly.xml >

[GitHub] incubator-mnemonic pull request #65: Adding java docs to travis

2017-08-31 Thread bigdata-memory
Github user bigdata-memory commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/65#discussion_r136454730 --- Diff: .travis.yml --- @@ -37,6 +37,6 @@ install: script: - ls -l $TRAVIS_BUILD_DIR - - docker run -v

[GitHub] incubator-mnemonic pull request #65: Adding java docs to travis

2017-08-31 Thread bigdata-memory
Github user bigdata-memory commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/65#discussion_r136454237 --- Diff: .travis.yml --- @@ -37,6 +37,6 @@ install: script: - ls -l $TRAVIS_BUILD_DIR - - docker run -v

[GitHub] incubator-mnemonic pull request #64: Fixed MNEMONIC-361: Fails to generate J...

2017-08-31 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/64 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[jira] [Commented] (MNEMONIC-361) Fails to generate Javadocs

2017-08-31 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16149338#comment-16149338 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNEMONIC-361: - GitHub user bigdata-memory opened a pull request:

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

2017-08-31 Thread Wen Tong
+1 support for graduation. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Wei HE wrote: > +1 support for graduation. > > Wei HE > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > >> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the readiness >>