Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Tony Chemit
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:54:09 +0100 Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: +1 MojoHaus > then we have a few proposals: > - Mojo Extras > - MojoHaus > - The Mojo Project > > > I really like MojoHaus > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit : > > I think it's a bad idea to not i

[mojo-dev] [RESULT] [VOTE] Move the shitty-maven-plugin to the Graveyard

2015-03-11 Thread Baptiste Mathus
This vote has passed: +1: Robert, Jyeryn, Baptiste, Anders 0: None -1: None I'll proceed with the burial. Thanks 2015-03-03 22:23 GMT+01:00 Robert Scholte : > +1 > > Op Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:51:58 +0100 schreef Baptiste Mathus < > bapti...@codehaus.org>: > > > Well, since this didn't seem to tr

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 for MojoHaus Olivier On 11 March 2015 at 18:54, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > then we have a few proposals: > - Mojo Extras > - MojoHaus > - The Mojo Project > > > I really like MojoHaus > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit : > > I think it's a bad idea to not i

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 for MojoHaus On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > then we have a few proposals: > - Mojo Extras > - MojoHaus > - The Mojo Project > > > I really like MojoHaus > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit : >> I think it's a bad idea to not includ

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Dan Tran
+1 I really like the name - MojoHaus -D On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > +1 for MojoHaus > > Op Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:06:34 +0100 schreef Brett Okken < > brett.okken...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 for MojoHaus >> On Mar 11, 2015 4:35 AM, "Stephen Connolly" > com> >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 for MojoHaus Op Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:06:34 +0100 schreef Brett Okken : +1 for MojoHaus On Mar 11, 2015 4:35 AM, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: On 11 March 2015 at 07:54, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: then we have a few proposals: - Mojo Extras - MojoHaus - The Mojo Project I really like MojoH

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MASPECTJ-138) Remove "Not executing aspectJ compiler" message warning on pom packaging project

2015-03-11 Thread Laurent TOURREAU (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Laurent TOURREAU created an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Brett Okken
+1 for MojoHaus On Mar 11, 2015 4:35 AM, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: > On 11 March 2015 at 07:54, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > >> then we have a few proposals: >> - Mojo Extras >> - MojoHaus >> - The Mojo Project >> >> >> I really like MojoHaus >> > > I am tempted to don my despot hat and decree MojoHau

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 11 March 2015 at 07:54, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > then we have a few proposals: > - Mojo Extras > - MojoHaus > - The Mojo Project > > > I really like MojoHaus > I am tempted to don my despot hat and decree MojoHaus the winner ;-) > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous a

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Baptiste Mathus
+1 I also like the CodeMaison idea :-) 2015-03-11 8:54 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY : > then we have a few proposals: > - Mojo Extras > - MojoHaus > - The Mojo Project > > > I really like MojoHaus > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit : > > I think it's a bad ide

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
then we have a few proposals: - Mojo Extras - MojoHaus - The Mojo Project I really like MojoHaus Regards, Hervé Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit : > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. The > project has been around for over 10 years now and it wid

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MCOBERTURA-201) Plugin not failing when packageBranche/LineRate not achieved

2015-03-11 Thread Martijn Lindhout (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Martijn Lindhout created an issue