Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Feb 07, at 1:41 AM 11 Feb 07, Wayne Fay wrote: I really have to agree with Jochen. I understand the point of alpha, beta etc in certain classes of applications but find it to be generally too much overhead with things like simple Maven plugins. The 0.x versioning already implies "not rea

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-11 Thread Dan Tran
MOJO was started out by Maven Dev folks, that explains the where the convention coming from ;-) I am fine with both, but I can see the need to stick to one. -D On 2/10/07, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I really have to agree with Jochen. I understand the point of alpha, beta etc in ce

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-10 Thread Wayne Fay
I really have to agree with Jochen. I understand the point of alpha, beta etc in certain classes of applications but find it to be generally too much overhead with things like simple Maven plugins. The 0.x versioning already implies "not really a full/final release" so I think the alpha tag is a

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-10 Thread Martin van den Bemt
lol :) Mgr, Martin Raphaël Piéroni wrote: > I tried it, on a pet project. > So changing my vote to +1 > > Raphaël > > > 2007/2/10, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >: > > +0 (don't even know what rat is) > > Raphaël > > 2007/2/10, Jochen Wiedmann <[

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-10 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
I tried it, on a pet project. So changing my vote to +1 Raphaël 2007/2/10, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: +0 (don't even know what rat is) Raphaël 2007/2/10, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 2/10/07, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 on alpha-1 release. > > I'll

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-10 Thread Martin van den Bemt
+1 definitely helps Apache projects which are using maven2.. Mvgr, Martin Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a release of the rat-maven-plugin. The generated > site with the docs can be viewed at > >http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/ > > Note, in particular, the R

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-10 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
+0 (don't even know what rat is) Raphaël 2007/2/10, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 2/10/07, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on alpha-1 release. I'll never understand the advantage of these long version numbers for such simple programs like this, but the change is fine for m

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 2/10/07, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 on alpha-1 release. I'll never understand the advantage of these long version numbers for such simple programs like this, but the change is fine for me. Jochen -- How fast can a year go? As fast as your childs first year. -

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-10 Thread jean-laurent de morlhon
+1 On 2/10/07, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By convention we always start out as alpha-1. Even thou 0.1 is fined but I think we should with alpha for consistency. +1 on alpha-1 release. -D On 2/9/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a release

Re: [mojo-dev] VOTE: Release rat-maven-plugin 0.1

2007-02-09 Thread Dan Tran
By convention we always start out as alpha-1. Even thou 0.1 is fined but I think we should with alpha for consistency. +1 on alpha-1 release. -D On 2/9/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'd like to ask for a release of the rat-maven-plugin. The generated site with the docs