Dear All,
Please review the design for Up-Streaming MXNet HIP Port.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uGr1KPVDqDVUwnhM0vtmxkZZpE2Mf9slNF9e2IbwVj0/edit?usp=sharing
Regards,
Srihari Karnam
Hi Steffen
I don't see that text in the proposal. I personally think the bar should be
the same for everyone independent of their affiliation, as per Apache ways
of working, and per ethical principles of equality and meritocracy,
otherwise we open the door to discrimination.
This old movie with
Please see conf call information for 8am and 5pm PDT session and proposed
agenda below. Pleas note different conf call login between both session.
In case there is a problem again with conf call I will update slack and dev@
.
Steffen
Proposed Agenda:
1. Introduction of participants
2. Next
Carin - I got feedback on my proposal and made changes. I incorporated
Tianqi's suggesiton that we should strive to nominate committer/PPMC
candidates from outside ones own organization. It should not be considered
as a hard rule, but recommendation.
Steffen
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:18 PM Carin
>
> To become a reviewer , he/she would have to have some
> history of code review in MXNet.
In contrary, we should to bring reviewers who have contributed to the repo,
but do not have code review history before, there is always a time gap
between someone who contributed something, to someone
Hi,
There is nothing stopping committers from soliciting reviews from
contributors. This is a good suggestion and committers should do this much
more often. I am assuming that the selection process for reviewers also
goes through PPMC. To become a reviewer , he/she would have to have some
history
Community,
Please check out and share the post:
https://medium.com/apache-mxnet/gluoncv-0-3-a-new-horizon-564326364e16 for
v0.3 of gluon-cv, detailing improvements to existing implementations of
state of the art cv models. Particularly of note, is the accuracy
improvement for the ResNet family
It is true that is a person is trusted to review code they should be
considered as a committer.
On the other hand, it is also super valuable to solicit reviews from
contributors who have the potential to become committers. These code
reviews may not necessarily directly grant the merge of the
It is true that is a person is trusted to review code they should be
considered as a reviewer.
But what I am trying to say is that -- it is also super valuable to solicit
reviews from contributors who have the potential to become committers.
These code reviews may not necessarily directly grant
It's not my intent to kill this (I just asked a question). What are
mentors' input?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 3:50 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> To be clear, we are not splitting the committers into reviewers, we are
> recognizing an additional set of contributors who could become potential
>
Hi Pedro:
If any of the Amazonians have enough merit to get the committership.
The PMCs outside Amazon should recognize and bring them to the
committership -- This proposal is not about discriminating against anyone.
Please do note that this community is bigger than Amazon itself -- there
are
Hi Pedro:
If any of the Amazonians have enough merit to get the committership.
The PMCs outside Amazon should recognize and bring them to the
committership -- This proposal is not about discriminating against anyone.
Please do note that this community is bigger than Amazon itself -- there
are
Tianqi and Pedro - I suggested the following in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal
:
In general, a nominee for PPMC will be evaluated based on the merit and
contribution, independent of his affiliation.
Hi
Tianqi, there's a saying that the road to hell is paved with good
intentions. I think most of us here are enthusiastic about increasing
diversity of contributions to this project and are working actively towards
this. Having any kind of positive or negative discrimination seems to me
like it
Generally if a person is trusted to review code they should be
considered as a committer. Agree that having good reviewers are
important but the way most projects recognize those efforts is by making
them committers.
- Bob
On 10/22/2018 5:23 PM, Chris Olivier wrote:
> Are there any other
Dear MXNet community,
Unfortunately, due to various reasons, we need to reschedule the demo to
next week's user group, to 30th of October.
Best regards,
Anton
вт, 16 окт. 2018 г. в 18:03, Pedro Larroy :
> These are two separate events. The London meetup is not related to Anton's
> original
16 matches
Mail list logo
