Re: Source Headers [Was: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3]

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:15 PM Henri Yandell wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:38 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri

Source Headers [Was: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3]

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:38 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell wrote: > > > >> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"? > >> > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell wrote: > >> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"? >> >> > Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we > can't remove the

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell wrote: > Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"? > > Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we can't remove the copyright claim that already exists. Us receiving an ICLA is what allows us to say "Licensed

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"? On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament wrote: > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes: > > - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have explicit > notice requirements (they don't seem to)

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Thanks John. I will create the JIRA tickets to track your inputs as requested. Meghna > On Aug 29, 2017, at 6:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes: > > - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes: - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have explicit notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the NOTICE file. - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project. We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Hi Henri, If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of IP Clearance. It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0. Are there any contributors to the project before

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release. Will review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar. There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D.

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far. Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote? Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project? Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit. Dom On Tue, Aug 29,