I just added an initial list of adopters of MXNet Operator here:
https://github.com/kubeflow/mxnet-operator/pull/63
*Commnity - If your company uses MXNet Operator, please let me know in the
PR*.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:08 AM Yuan Tang wrote:
> Definitely. Thanks for asking and I am happy to
## Description
This issue is being created to gather:
1. All the new feature requests/suggestions for MXNet website improvements and
changes.
2. Current we have 40 open issues tagged "Website" -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AWebsite
, if there
Hi Ciyong,
Awesome news!
Thanks for driving 1.7.0 release!
Looking forward to collaboration.
Cheers,
Chai
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 02:51, Chen, Ciyong wrote:
> Hi MXNet Community,
>
>
>
> As the 1.6.0 release is done (many thanks to Przemek) for a while, it's
> time to prepare for the next minor
Hello MXNet community,
> The new AMI will be tested in a CI Dev environment and we will notify
you when it's ready for adoption on the CI.
As we continue to work on improving & updating the CI, I want to notify the
community about steps taken for testing CI Dev environments.
In order to ensure
Hi MXNet Community,
As the 1.6.0 release is done (many thanks to Przemek) for a while, it's time to
prepare for the next minor release of MXNet 1.7.0.
Thanks to Patric (pengzhao-intel@github) who had created the GitHub issue[1] to
discuss and collect the major features for 1.7.0. Please
Definitely. Thanks for asking and I am happy to provide more background.
The MXNet Operator has v1 controller. However, there has no formal release
on GitHub and it has not been included in Kubeflow by default yet. Though
users are welcome to use it as a standalone k8s operator. This will
