Hey Steffen, thanks for allowing a little extra time to merge PRs. All my
PRs are in. #13905 looks good to me, but we may want someone a little more
familiar to MKLDNN / the ndarray.h file review as well.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:53 AM Steffen Rochel
wrote:
> Still waiting for merge of
> htt
Still waiting for merge of
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905
All other PR are merged and CI tests are passing. Please no more changes on
1.4.x branch beside merge for PR 13905, so we can move forward with 1.4.0
release.
Best Regards,
Steffen
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:48 AM Ste
That's a great question! Since we record branch-coverage as well, we would
now reliably notice these test-gaps and could make targeted tests.
Additionally, we could define test-coverage thresholds for certain files to
enforce this - e.g. 100% for all operators.
While the stochastic approach certai
wouldn’t abandoning stochastic testing mean that execution paths would no
longer be tested and therefore increase issues found in production?
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 5:13 AM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> a few months ago, I have enabled test coverage recording for the MXNet
> repos
Thanks - props for the images belongs to the original Scala article
https://medium.com/apache-mxnet/object-detection-with-mxnet-scala-inference-api-9049230c77fd
and Kedar - the contributor that ported the object detection feature to
Clojure. They are pretty awesome though.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 a
Hello everyone,
a few months ago, I have enabled test coverage recording for the MXNet
repository [1]. The next step would be to report the coverage changes to
pull requests so we can make them part of the review. For this, I've
created a pull request here at [2].
Before this feature can be enabl
