Still waiting for merge of
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905

All other PR are merged and CI tests are passing. Please no more changes on
1.4.x branch beside merge for PR 13905, so we can move forward with 1.4.0
release.

Best Regards,
Steffen

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:48 AM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear MXNet community -
> thanks for merging previously agreed PR's into v1.4.x branch.
>
> Kellen and Zhennan - what is the ETA for
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905 ? Please try to
> merge today.
>
> Yuxi asked offline to merge
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13922 to complete Horovod
> integration. PR will be merged today.
>
> After above PR are merge and CI passed successfully 1.4.0.rc1 will be
> created and voting started.
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:34 PM kellen sunderland <
> kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good Steffen.  I believe most of these PRs only fix functional
>> problems (they don't add features) and should be fairly low risk.
>>
>> Update from my side:
>> 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <- Already
>> merged, thanks Haibin!
>>
>> Ready for review / merge with all tests passed:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897
>>
>> -Kellen
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:06 PM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Kellen - thanks, please go ahead. I'm ok as long we avoid risky PR and
>> can
>> > get to a stable and tested build by Friday.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Steffen
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:48 PM kellen sunderland <
>> > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Many thanks for the license fixes and allowing some other PRs to come
>> > into
>> > > the release.
>> > >
>> > > For #13697 I've contacted the author Zhennan and let him know he can
>> cut
>> > a
>> > > branch to v1.4.x to update any APIs that are required.
>> > >
>> > > For the other PRs listed here's some new PRs for the v1.4.x branch.
>> > > 13188: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898
>> > > 13727: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900
>> > > 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <-
>> Already
>> > > merged, thanks Haibin!
>> > >
>> > > I'd also propose that we include this TensorRT PR which fixes
>> inference
>> > > bugs and updates to a more stable commit of onnx-trt:
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897
>> > >
>> > > -Kellen
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:57 PM Steffen Rochel <
>> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Lin - please go ahead to integrate into 1.4.x.
>> > > > Steffen
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:17 PM Lin Yuan <apefor...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Steffen,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I would like to ask to include one more PR for 1.4.0.rc1:
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13845
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This PR exports exception handling API of MXNet. It is needed by
>> > > Horovod
>> > > > > with MXNet integration to elegantly throw exception at Python
>> level
>> > > > rather
>> > > > > than a C++ abort.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Lin
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:24 PM Steffen Rochel <
>> > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Dear MXNet community -
>> > > > > > Zach & friends made good progress resolving the licensing
>> issues.
>> > One
>> > > > > more
>> > > > > > PR on 1.4.x branch is expected today.
>> > > > > > The code freeze for 1.4.0.rc1 is Thursday Jan 17th 6pm PST.
>> > > > > > I'm asking the requester to add following PR to 1.4.x branch:
>> > > > > > Tao:
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13882
>> > > > > > Kellen:
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13697
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13188
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13727
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13695
>> > > > > > Pedro:
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13535
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > If there are additional PR to be considered for 1.4.0.rc1 please
>> > send
>> > > > > > request to dev@.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > Steffen
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:28 AM Qing Lan <lanking...@live.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I added a section F in the document that explained the current
>> > > > > > > static-linked dependencies we used for official release. As
>> there
>> > > > are a
>> > > > > > few
>> > > > > > > licenses are under BSD3 and GPL, we need to handle them in our
>> > next
>> > > > > > > release. Please take a look and leave any concerns you may
>> have.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > Qing
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On 1/7/19, 8:33 PM, "kellen sunderland" <
>> > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     So I see two quick options that should cut down on the
>> > > dependency
>> > > > > > > licenses
>> > > > > > >     required for TRT in the source release.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     1: We can simply remove in the release package the
>> submodules
>> > > for
>> > > > > > onnx
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > >     folder
>> > > > > > >
>> > > incubator-mxnet/3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party.
>> > > > > > >     None of those dependencies are used in the build (I've
>> just
>> > > > > verified
>> > > > > > >     locally on my machine).
>> > > > > > >     2: We can make a cmake based checkout system and ensure we
>> > only
>> > > > > > > checkout
>> > > > > > >     the required files when TRT builds are enabled (similar to
>> > the
>> > > > > > current
>> > > > > > >     mkl-ml setup).
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     I'd suggest option 1 for this release, and that we support
>> > > > option 2
>> > > > > > > for the
>> > > > > > >     1.5 release.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:19 PM Lv, Tao A <
>> tao.a...@intel.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > What should I do for the double headers in
>> > > > > > > 3rdparty/mkldnn/src/cpu/xbyak/?
>> > > > > > >     >
>> > > > > > >     > -tao
>> > > > > > >     >
>> > > > > > >     > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > >     > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com]
>> > > > > > >     > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM
>> > > > > > >     > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > > >     > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status
>> > > > > > >     >
>> > > > > > >     > Kellen and Tao -
>> > > > > > >     > yes, the understanding is that dependencies need to be
>> > > > considered
>> > > > > > > and all
>> > > > > > >     > licences referenced to include in top level LICENSE
>> file.
>> > > > > > >     > Appreciate your help with it.
>> > > > > > >     > Steffen
>> > > > > > >     >
>> > > > > > >     > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland <
>> > > > > > >     > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >     >
>> > > > > > >     > > Sorry to hear about the licensing issues.  I was
>> > following
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > general
>> > > > > > >     > > vote but I'm still lacking some clarity around what
>> > > licenses
>> > > > in
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > >     > > onnx-trt repo need to be surfaced.  I believe
>> onnx-trt is
>> > > MIT
>> > > > > > >     > > licensed, but it includes Onnx as a third party repo
>> > which
>> > > > then
>> > > > > > > brings
>> > > > > > >     > > in dependencies with a variety of licenses.  The
>> proposal
>> > > is
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > >     > > look at these on an individual basis and then add
>> them to
>> > > our
>> > > > > top
>> > > > > > > level
>> > > > > > >     > LICENSE file right?
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >     > > An alternative is that we may be able to checkout a
>> > smaller
>> > > > > > source
>> > > > > > >     > > code dependency tree if we remove a few unneeded
>> ONNX's
>> > > > > > > dependencies
>> > > > > > >     > > (pybind and google-bench).  My hope is that this
>> wouldn't
>> > > > > affect
>> > > > > > > our
>> > > > > > >     > > compilation process and would get us down to two
>> licenses
>> > > to
>> > > > > > report
>> > > > > > >     > > (just Onnx and Onnx-TRT, both MIT).
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >     > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:07 PM Meghna Baijal
>> > > > > > >     > > <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >     > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > Hi All,
>> > > > > > >     > > > For some more context, these were the last emails I
>> > sent
>> > > on
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > dev
>> > > > > > >     > > > and legal lists requesting help on the open
>> questions
>> > –
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > 1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5 <
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.mbox
>> > > > > > >     > > /%3CCAK1xzDe6ECToKt_2cTR_7txQQCwHeYfvxXDfmuGgfA3jaTs=
>> > > > > > > j...@mail.gmail.com
>> > > > > > >     > > %3E
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > 2. Question on dev about googletest file <
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201804.mbox/%3CCAMG
>> > > > > > >     > > gKDC8szdfFqQhhSNpwwT_3zi4LBS7A=
>> > > > u4v7kj4ule44u...@mail.gmail.com
>> > > > > > %3E
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > 3. General Request for review of the licenses wiki <
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201801.mbox/%3CCAM
>> > > > > > >     > > GgKDCi=s933zcVWwei15i5uBC1h88VUogt3Br=Vq28=
>> > > > > vi...@mail.gmail.com
>> > > > > > %3E
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > >  (Note: You can click on the the “>>” next to the
>> > thread
>> > > on
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > top
>> > > > > > >     > > > right to view the next responses in the email
>> threads
>> > in
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > apache
>> > > > > > >     > > > archive. )
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > >     > > > Meghna Baijal
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:30 PM Steffen Rochel
>> > > > > > >     > > > <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >     > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > Dear MXNet community -
>> > > > > > >     > > > > as you should have seen in previous email, voting
>> for
>> > > > > > > v1.4.0.rc0
>> > > > > > >     > > > > has
>> > > > > > >     > > been
>> > > > > > >     > > > > cancelled. We received a -1 vote due to
>> outstanding
>> > > > license
>> > > > > > > issues.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > Please help to update
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+License
>> > > > > > >     > > s
>> > > > > > >     > > > > and
>> > > > > > >     > > > > resolve outstanding issues.
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > I would like to ask specifically for help from
>> > > > contributors
>> > > > > > to
>> > > > > > >     > > > > mkldnn, opemmp and onnx-tensorrt to address the
>> > > feedback
>> > > > > from
>> > > > > > >     > > > > Justin - see
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8753
>> > > > > > >     > > fee57562a861d61379d31e9@%
>> 3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org
>> > %3E
>> > > > > > >     > > > > .
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > I suggest to fix the issues first on master, then
>> > > > > cherry-pick
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > >     > > > > merge
>> > > > > > >     > > > to
>> > > > > > >     > > > > 1.4.x branch.
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude Julia from 1.4.0
>> release as
>> > > > > > > integration
>> > > > > > >     > > > > into MXNet repo and upgrade to 0.7+ is WIP.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude googletest/googlemock
>> from
>> > > > 1.4.0
>> > > > > > > release
>> > > > > > >     > > > > as outstanind license issues are not resolved yet.
>> > This
>> > > > > > should
>> > > > > > > not
>> > > > > > >     > > > > impact users.
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > Please provide your feedback to the suggestions.
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > >     > > > > Steffen
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steffen Rochel <
>> > > > > > >     > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > Dear MXNet community -
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > I hope you have seen that voting for v1.4.0.rc0
>> has
>> > > > > started
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > will continue until December 27th noon. So far
>> two
>> > > > > binding
>> > > > > > +1
>> > > > > > >     > votes.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > I suggesting the following schedule to account
>> for
>> > > > > holidays
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > of
>> > > > > > >     > > > course
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > depending on voting feedback.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > Vote on dev@ until 12/27
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > Vote on general@ 12/28 – 1/3
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > Release announcement with pre-build language
>> > bindings
>> > > > 1/9
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > Please let me know if you have concerns with the
>> > > > proposed
>> > > > > > > schedule.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > Steffen
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Haibin Lin <
>> > > > > > >     > > haibin.lin....@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Hi Steffen,
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Aston and I would like to bring this PR to your
>> > > > > attention:
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686,
>> > > > > > > where Zhi
>> > > > > > >     > > fixed
>> > > > > > >     > > > > the
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> num_worker argument of DataLoader on windows.
>> > > Without
>> > > > > this
>> > > > > > > fix,
>> > > > > > >     > > using
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> DataLoader with num_worker > 0 would result in
>> > crash
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > > Windows.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > Bringing
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> this PR to 1.4.x would greatly benefit windows
>> > users
>> > > > of
>> > > > > > > MXNet.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Aston
>> > > > > > >     > > > is
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> working on the dive into deep learning book
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> <http://diveintodeeplearning.org> based on
>> MXNet,
>> > > > which
>> > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > due
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> and
>> > > > > > >     > > > > frozen
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> for publication next week. Currently the book
>> will
>> > > > > depend
>> > > > > > on
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> MXNet
>> > > > > > >     > > > 1.4.0
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> and discourages readers from using multi-worker
>> > > > > > DataLoaders
>> > > > > > > due
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> to
>> > > > > > >     > > > this
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> bug
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> on Windows. With this fix Aston can update the
>> > > > examples
>> > > > > in
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> book
>> > > > > > >     > > > with
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> DataLoader using multiple workers, which will
>> be
>> > > very
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> beneficial to
>> > > > > > >     > > > the
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> broader MXNet community.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Best,
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Haibin
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:11 AM Pedro Larroy <
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > Hi Steffen
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > Added some notes in your PR for the release
>> > notes.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > In particular, I'm a bit concerned about the
>> > > status
>> > > > of
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > topology
>> > > > > > >     > > > aware
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > communication, since it has open issues and
>> is
>> > not
>> > > > > being
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > tested in
>> > > > > > >     > > > CI.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > (The tests also fail). I think we should
>> anounce
>> > > it
>> > > > > when
>> > > > > > > it's
>> > > > > > >     > > > working
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > properly and it's well tested.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > Pedro.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:06 AM Steffen
>> Rochel
>> > <
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > wrote:
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community -
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > all issues beside one
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > <
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13438
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > have
>> > > > > > >     > > > been
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > addressed. I suggest to document the last
>> > > > remaining
>> > > > > > > issue
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > as
>> > > > > > >     > > known
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > problem
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > and move forward with the release.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Please communicate if you have concerns of
>> > know
>> > > > > about
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > critical
>> > > > > > >     > > > > issues
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> to
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > be
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > addressed before starting vote about
>> releasing
>> > > > 1.4.0
>> > > > > > as
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > soon as
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> possible.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Please also have a look at the release
>> notes <
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incu
>> > > > > > >     > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > and provide feedback.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > I'm planing to start voting beginning of
>> next
>> > > > week.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Steffen
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:31 PM Steffen
>> Rochel
>> > <
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > Hi Pedro - this are indeed the draft
>> release
>> > > > notes
>> > > > > > for
>> > > > > > >     > v1.4.0.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Please
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > add
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > description as you suggested.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > All - please have a look at the release
>> > notes
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > > provide
>> > > > > > >     > > > feedback
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> and
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > suggestions..
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > Steffen
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM Zhao,
>> Patric
>> > <
>> > > > > > >     > > > > patric.z...@intel.com>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > wrote:
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Hi Steffen,
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> I saw the draft of 1.4 release notes in
>> > here
>> > > (
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incu
>> > > > > > >     > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> ).
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Is this near the final version?  I'd
>> like
>> > to
>> > > > add
>> > > > > > some
>> > > > > > >     > > > > descriptions
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> of
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > new
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> quantization features enabled in 1.4.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Is it OK?
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> --Patric
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:
>> > > > > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com]
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2018 1:12
>> AM
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Subject: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release
>> > status
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Dear MXNet community - I would like to
>> > > > provide
>> > > > > > > update
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > on v1.4.0 status, details
>> > > > > > >     > > are
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> tracked
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> here
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > <
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
>> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > .
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for everybody
>> effort
>> > to
>> > > > > > resolve
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > the
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> identified
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> issues.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > We are down to 3 open issues - for
>> > details
>> > > > > please
>> > > > > > > see
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > cubating%29+1.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > 4.0
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > +Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.4.0ReleasePlanandS
>> > > > > > >     > > > +Release+Plan+and+t
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > atu
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+s-OpenPRstotrack
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > <
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >     >
>> > > > > >
>> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
>> 4.0ReleasePlanandStatus-OpenPRstotrack>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Please help to resolve the remaining
>> > issues
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > integrate
>> > > > > > >     > > to
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> v1.4.x
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> branch.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Current estimate to address the
>> > identified
>> > > > > > security
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> vulnerabilities
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > in
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> the
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Scala/Java package and merge into
>> v1.4.x
>> > > > branch
>> > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > end
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > of
>> > > > > > >     > > > next
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> week
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > (December 14th) I will communicate as
>> > soon
>> > > I
>> > > > > have
>> > > > > > > more
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> information.
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Regards,
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Steffen
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >     > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > > >
>> > > > > > >     > > >
>> > > > > > >     > >
>> > > > > > >     >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to