+1
On 7/19/19, 12:59 PM, "Zhu Zhaoqi" wrote:
+1
Lin Yuan 于2019年7月19日周五 上午12:06写道:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:03 AM Chaitanya Bapat
> wrote:
>
> > +1 definitely.
> >
> > Going forward,
> > MXNet repo as it stands has ~95,000+
+1
Lin Yuan 于2019年7月19日周五 上午12:06写道:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:03 AM Chaitanya Bapat
> wrote:
>
> > +1 definitely.
> >
> > Going forward,
> > MXNet repo as it stands has ~95,000+ lines of Python code [1]
> > OpenEdx has a million (10x) LOC and this mammoth effort of porting from
> >
+1
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:03 AM Chaitanya Bapat
wrote:
> +1 definitely.
>
> Going forward,
> MXNet repo as it stands has ~95,000+ lines of Python code [1]
> OpenEdx has a million (10x) LOC and this mammoth effort of porting from
> Python 2 to 3 is treated as a separate project named
+1 definitely.
Going forward,
MXNet repo as it stands has ~95,000+ lines of Python code [1]
OpenEdx has a million (10x) LOC and this mammoth effort of porting from
Python 2 to 3 is treated as a separate project named Incremental
Improvement. [2]
We can take inspiration from them and have a
+1
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 04:28 Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice.
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:15 PM Marco de Abreu
> wrote:
> >
> > Looking at EOL is certainly a good idea! I think once we get closer to
> > deprecation, we can check adoption statistics to make a
Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:15 PM Marco de Abreu wrote:
>
> Looking at EOL is certainly a good idea! I think once we get closer to
> deprecation, we can check adoption statistics to make a well-informed
> decision that gives us the most advantages without dropping
Looking at EOL is certainly a good idea! I think once we get closer to
deprecation, we can check adoption statistics to make a well-informed
decision that gives us the most advantages without dropping the ball on a
majority of users (or supporting a branch that is going EOL soon). A survey
from
I would suggest supporting Python 3.5+ since the earlier versions have
reached end-of-life status:
https://devguide.python.org/devcycle/#end-of-life-branches
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 3:36 PM Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> +1
>
> This would simplify CI, reduce costs and more. I think a followup
> question
+1
This would simplify CI, reduce costs and more. I think a followup
question is what would be the mininum Python3 version supported?
Depending on that we might be able to use type annotations for example
or other features.
Pedro.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:07 PM Yuan Tang wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On
+1
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:51 PM Yuxi Hu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31 AM Tong He wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Tong He
> >
> >
> > Jake Lee 于2019年7月18日周四 上午11:29写道:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:27 AM Junru Shao
> > > wrote:
> > >
> >
+1
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31 AM Tong He wrote:
> +1
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tong He
>
>
> Jake Lee 于2019年7月18日周四 上午11:29写道:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:27 AM Junru Shao
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:12 AM Anirudh Acharya <
>
+1
Best regards,
Tong He
Jake Lee 于2019年7月18日周四 上午11:29写道:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:27 AM Junru Shao
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:12 AM Anirudh Acharya
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:03 AM Marco de Abreu <
>
+1
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:27 AM Junru Shao wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:12 AM Anirudh Acharya
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:03 AM Marco de Abreu >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Marco
> > >
> > > Sheng Zha schrieb am Do., 18. Juli 2019, 19:59:
>
+1
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:12 AM Anirudh Acharya
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:03 AM Marco de Abreu
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Marco
> >
> > Sheng Zha schrieb am Do., 18. Juli 2019, 19:59:
> >
> > > Dear MXNet community,
> > >
> > > I'd like to reopen the discussion on
+1
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:03 AM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> +1
>
> -Marco
>
> Sheng Zha schrieb am Do., 18. Juli 2019, 19:59:
>
> > Dear MXNet community,
> >
> > I'd like to reopen the discussion on deprecating python2 support. This
> > would help modernize the design and engineering practice
+1
-Marco
Sheng Zha schrieb am Do., 18. Juli 2019, 19:59:
> Dear MXNet community,
>
> I'd like to reopen the discussion on deprecating python2 support. This
> would help modernize the design and engineering practice in MXNet to help
> improve speed and quality.
>
> For this purpose, I reopened
16 matches
Mail list logo