Dear MXNet community,
I'm happy to announce the results of the vote.
This vote passes with 0 +1 votes (0 binding), no 0 votes, and 2 -1 vote.
+1 votes
* No votes
0 votes
* No votes
-1 votes
* kellen sunderland
* Sheng Zha
Vote thread can be found here [1]. The list of members can be found here
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for your reply.
> I personally prefer small incremental changes, and starting with some MVP,
> where M is
> minimal, meaning least possible effort (e.g. number of dependencies) used
> from conan.
Agreed. That said, this seems like a case where adoption decision can't be
b
Hi Sheng Zha,
> Currently, the linked PR only includes OpenBLAS
actually, it's OpenBLAS + OpenCV + lapack, three libraries as
proof-of-concept
> A proof-of-concept that shows it actually replaces more dependency than
openblas would be helpful
may we define an actual scope then, e.g. how much dep
To be clear, my intention is really to prevent a seemingly good solution to
exacerbate the problem that it sets out to solve. This tends to happen when
there are not enough people to drive it to the end.
If there are additional values in this solution that people feel outweighs the
problems bel
Thank you for the explanation and sorry that I missed the earlier context as it
has been a while. While I like the idea of simplifying the dependency
management with tools like conan, I have the following concerns on this vote
as-is (it's also my take on why I think the PR is stuck):
- It's unc
Hi Konstantin, Kellen,
Thank you guys for the very detailed explanation! I was lacking some
relevant contexts and previous discussions, which got me confused
previously.
My understanding that C++ is short of a perfect package manager. I totally
agree that for any C++ project, it would be great to
Hi Junru,
> I am actually a bit concerned about the security issues. We are asked to
download binaries from third-party websites, which are not controlled or
validated by Apache
it's possible to run conan server inside apache network and download
binaries and sources only from this remote
> CMake
So firstly let's try to keep our responses empathetic and avoid ad-hom
comments. It might be beneficial to take some time to review the Apache
Code of Conduct [1]. Konstantin has taken a lot of time to think about
dependency management in MXNet on a volunteer basis which is commendable.
Second,
I am actually a bit concerned about the security issues. We are asked to
download binaries from third-party websites, which are not controlled or
validated by Apache. Although it is claimed to be “decentralized”, I am
really not convinced where the security comes from.
In the meantime, sacrificing
Hey Konstantin. Thanks for starting an email thread and sorry for the
confusion. I think the ides is that we should discuss and agree on
Conan.io adoption first on the dev list, then start merging PRs. Release
1.4.1 is already in testing and the 1.5 code freeze deadline is also near
so I think i
hi Sheng Zha,
on pull request review I was told by Anirudh anirudhacharya and Roshani
Nagmote to start discussion/vote on the mxnet dev list. it seems to be a
vicious circle now - on GitHub I am told to use vote, and on vote I am told
to use GitHub, this doesn't help much.
FYI GitHub review stuck,
hi Sheng Zha,
on pull request review I was told by Anirudh anirudhacharya and Roshani
Nagmote to start discussion/vote on the mxnet dev list. it seems to be a
vicious circle now - on GitHub I am told to use vote, and on vote I am told
to use GitHub, this doesn't help much.
FYI GitHub review stuck,
Hi Konstantin,
While conan looks like an option that's worth exploring, given that your
request is to merge the pull request, I'd suggest that the request should go
through the regular pull request review and it doesn't really need a vote (as
it doesn't substitute reviews anyway)
If you would
Dear MXNet community,
This is the 3-day vote to add conan support for Apache MXNet (incubating)
version v1.4.1.
The voting on dev@ list will start May 03 23:59:59 (PST) and close on May
06 23:59:59.
Background: conan is open-source, freeware, cross-platform package manager
for C and C++ projects,
Dear MXNet community,
This is the 3-day vote to add conan support for Apache MXNet (incubating)
version v1.4.1.
The voting on dev@ list will start May 03 23:59:59 (PST) and close on May
06 23:59:59.
Background: conan is open-source, freeware, cross-platform package manager
for C and C++ projects,
15 matches
Mail list logo
