My suggestion is that there be a formal doc explaining the relationship
between TVM/NNVM and MXNet/mshadow and the next step of their roles in the
MXNet as a whole. I think this would ease the learning curve of potential
developers.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Tianqi Chen
wrote:
> It is true
It is true that most of the current GPU code depends on mshadow. Porting
the operator code entirely over to TVM will take quite a huge effort. So a
more gradual path forward is to could be drop-in TVM to support cases that
it optimizes well(ARM, AMDGPU, accelerators) while keeping the old
infrastru
After some reading and learning of MXNet, I tentatively made the conclusion
that the migration of MXNet to TVM, if it exists, has yet finished.
Currently, mshadow, on which most of current operator code is still based,
seems to carry out the most functionality that TVM can carry ultimately.
Will an
