Hello,
don't call mvn with -Dmaven.test.skip=true if you are going to checkin
something, please.
Regards
Bernd
--
Dipl.-Ing. Bernd Bohmann - Atanion GmbH - Software Development
Bismarckstr. 13, 26122 Oldenburg, http://www.atanion.com
phone: +49 441 4082312, mobile: +49 173 8839471, fax: +49
Someone has changed the name of a test case.
One test case is excluded by default in the configuration.
I'm exclude the AES test case again in the pom.
You should be able to call mvn install without extra configuration.
Bernd
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
On 2/20/06, *Craig McClanahan* <[EMAIL PROT
Most of the encryption tests have really strong cipher configurations. These
levels of encryption have to be enabled for a standard JDK. There is a brief
explanation in the javadocs of the tests themselves, although this does not
explain why they worked for you in the past.
Dennis Byrne
>---
On 2/20/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/20/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do the reports say under commons\target\surefire-reports ?Those were all changed over the weekend.Interesting ... all 20 failures were security exceptions (one of them below for an exam
On 2/20/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do the reports say under commons\target\surefire-reports ?Those were all changed over the weekend.Interesting ... all 20 failures were security exceptions (one of them below for an example). This is with Sun's JDK
1.4.2_10-b03) on Linux. I
one / zero = infinity ;-)
you talk about the configuration of the ExtensionsFilter there, right?
;)
no line - no mails
one line - infinite amount of mails
regards,
Martin
On 2/21/06, John Fallows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/18/06, Ed Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17
What do the reports say under commons\target\surefire-reports ?
Those were all changed over the weekend.
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 01:29 AM
>To: 'MyFaces Development'
>Subject: Maven2 build failure
On 2/20/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That is a *really* good idea ... I'll be adding it to Shale's test framework>tonight. I don't see it as mutually exclusive with any of the other cleanups>we are doing to ensure that different tests do not interfere with each
>other.>>CraigYou may
I'm trying to build the current trunk with Maven2, and am getting the following error. This worked a few days ago, but I'm afraid I cannot be any more precise than that about when it stopped working for me. Any ideas?
--- T E S T S--
>That is a *really* good idea ... I'll be adding it to Shale's test framework
>tonight. I don't see it as mutually exclusive with any of the other cleanups
>we are doing to ensure that different tests do not interfere with each
>other.
>
>Craig
You may want to look at this when you do that.
http:
Hmmm
ok - I just have seen many proposals coming in via general. Never mind!
Have you got any feedback on the proposal so far?
regards,
Martin
On 2/20/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin,
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+of+Propo
On 2/20/06, John Fallows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fyi - IIRC we tackled this problem slightly differently in the ADF Faces codebase.In an effort to fully isolate anything that might be keyed by ContextClassLoader (including FactoryFinder internal state), we created a trivial wrapper ClassLoader t
On 2/20/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Craig,On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:56 -0800, Craig McClanahan wrote:> There *is* a JSF-specific consideration to think about, if you have> classes that implement StateHolder (like a UIComponent> implementation). Log instances will generally *not
Hi Dennis,On 2/20/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you guys have anything fancy for ThreadLocal references of FacesContext? Did you set this to null per TestSuite? per TestCase? per test method ?Yes, IIRC there is a TestFacesContextFactory implicitly registered with the FactoryFinder
On 2/18/06, Ed Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:40 -0800, John Fallows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:JF> Wendy is exactly right. Of course, it would be much more convenient
JF> if the JSF 1.2 jars were on ibiblio.org to avoid the extraJF> configuration to pick up the jav
John,
Do you guys have anything fancy for ThreadLocal references of FacesContext?
Did you set this to null per TestSuite? per TestCase? per test method ?
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: John Fallows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:07 AM
>To: 'MyFa
Hi Craig,
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:56 -0800, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> There *is* a JSF-specific consideration to think about, if you have
> classes that implement StateHolder (like a UIComponent
> implementation). Log instances will generally *not* be serializable,
> so you will need to deal spe
fyi - IIRC we tackled this problem slightly differently in the ADF Faces codebase.In an effort to fully isolate anything that might be keyed by ContextClassLoader (including FactoryFinder internal state), we created a trivial wrapper ClassLoader to provide a unique ContextClassLoader in setUp() and
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1148?page=comments#action_12367112
]
Dennis Byrne commented on MYFACES-1148:
---
Can you please take a look at this other issues and see if they are related ?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-87
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1145?page=comments#action_12367111
]
Gerald Müllan commented on MYFACES-1145:
A currently working issue is the possibility to put a second value (located in
a hidden field) near each td element in the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1143?page=comments#action_12367108
]
Gerald Müllan commented on MYFACES-1143:
Yes, matthias is right. Now the suggest component runs under the dojo framework.
I have tried your suggestions with this ne
Hmmm. I thought I had checked everything in. My mistake. Everything
should compile now but there are still a few issues when actually
using tree2.
Sean
On 2/20/06, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> you removed a constructor from TreeWalkerBase, but it is still used in
> UITre
On 2/20/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 11:51 -0800, Adam Winer wrote:
> > IIRC, you have a personal stake in this issue, but the
> > plain truth is that there is no war anymore - java.util.logging
> > won by Sun's fiat. Technical superiority is not the ultima
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1140?page=comments#action_12367101
]
Dave commented on MYFACES-1140:
---
I just realized that the label will not work in my case.
In my case property name and value are in two table columns. A label has to be
in th
Weblogic Classloader problems during development (FactoryFinder)
Key: MYFACES-1148
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1148
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: Implementation
Ve
Sean,
you removed a constructor from TreeWalkerBase, but it is still used in
UITreeData. I can't build, even after a clean checkout.
Did i miss something?
Regards,
Volker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: schof
> Date: Mon Feb 20 11:32:01 2006
> New Revision: 379207
>
> URL: http://svn.apac
Welcome Craig :)On 2/20/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Welcome Craig...great to have you onboard...Seems like we have a prominent member now on board ;-)WernerSean Schofield schrieb:> Please welcome Craig McClanahan as our newest MyFaces committer. Most
> of you are probably familiar w
make com.sun.faces.verifyObjects, only better
-
Key: MYFACES-1147
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1147
Project: MyFaces
Type: New Feature
Components: Implementation
Reporter: Dennis Byrne
Assigned
>From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I saw the post on struts_dev, also that you found it cool. >
Yeah, well try not to hold that against it.
> I'll give it a try > > -Matthias > > On 2/20/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > Hey Matthias, > > > > Checkout this ex
Guys you really have to check the new input suggest table and drop downs
out, it is amazing...
I have known the comps from dojo before, but the input suggest
table is neat...
Werner
Martin Marinschek (JIRA) schrieb:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1141?page=comments#action
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1145?page=comments#action_12367086
]
Werner Punz commented on MYFACES-1145:
--
This behavior should be achievable by the inputsuggest table, as far as I can
see, but Gerald probably can comment on that more
Welcome Craig...
great to have you onboard...
Seems like we have a prominent member now on board ;-)
Werner
Sean Schofield schrieb:
Please welcome Craig McClanahan as our newest MyFaces committer. Most
of you are probably familiar with Craig's work as the original author
of Struts. Craig
Welcome Craig!
On 2/20/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations Craig !
>
> Dennis Byrne
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 03:30 PM
> >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> >Subject: New MyFaces Committer
I saw the post on struts_dev, also that you found it cool.
I'll give it a try
-Matthias
On 2/20/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Matthias,
>
> Checkout this example
> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482)
> Ryan Wynn posted. It's a data table/ tree combin
Congratulations Craig !
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 03:30 PM
>To: 'MyFaces Development'
>Subject: New MyFaces Committer: Craig McClanahan
>
>Please welcome Craig McClanahan as our newest MyFaces committe
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 11:51 -0800, Adam Winer wrote:
> IIRC, you have a personal stake in this issue, but the
> plain truth is that there is no war anymore - java.util.logging
> won by Sun's fiat. Technical superiority is not the ultimate
> arbiter.
>
Yes, I am a commons-logging committer. That
Hey Matthias,
Checkout this example (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482) Ryan Wynn posted. It's a data table/ tree combination that has view and edit modes. It uses Shale Clay full HTML views. It's pretty slick.
Gary
-- Original message -- Fr
Please welcome Craig McClanahan as our newest MyFaces committer. Most
of you are probably familiar with Craig's work as the original author
of Struts. Craig was also heavily involved in the original JSF
specification. No matter where you live, chances are he will be
coming to a conference in you
I just found this interesting inside of Matt Raible's blog side ([1]).
He is doing a contest too and he is also about to donate money to the winner
I created a (empty) wiki page([2]), to list the requirements, as
proposed by Jonas.
I mailed this, just to have life inside this thread :-D
-Matthia
On 2/19/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 22:33 -0800, Adam Winer wrote:
> > Weee if you implement StateHolder, this isn't an issue.
> > The public no-arg constructor will be used, variable initializer
> > expressions will run, etc.
> >
> > If you implem
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1146?page=all ]
Volker Weber closed MYFACES-1146:
-
Resolution: Invalid
> Impossible to hide footer in dataTable
> --
>
> Key: MYFACES-1146
> URL: ht
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1146?page=comments#action_12367069
]
Volker Weber commented on MYFACES-1146:
---
First: please ask such questions on users mailing list, this is not a bug.
A facet can contain only one child, so your code i
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-754?page=all ]
sean schofield closed MYFACES-754:
--
Fix Version: Nightly
Resolution: Fixed
Bernd is right. New maven build should fix this.
> Version within jar-names
>
>
So any comments on this latest version of the proposal? I'd like to
get started on breaking out tomahawk.
Sean
On 2/17/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MyFaces (sub-)projects on the site:
> > API
> > Impl
> > Commons
> > Tomahawk
> > Sandbox
> > (Tobago)
>
> agreed.
>
> >
Impossible to hide footer in dataTable
--
Key: MYFACES-1146
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1146
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: Tomahawk
Versions: 1.1.1
Reporter: Guy Bashan
Priority: T
Martin,
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+of+Proposal+by+Sponsor
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html
;-)
Regards,
Manfred
On 2/19/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manfred,
>
> I think you have to send this to [
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1143?page=comments#action_12367042
]
Jean-Claude Pace commented on MYFACES-1143:
---
No, I only used the release version
> InputSuggestAjax does not handle < and > correctly
> --
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1143?page=comments#action_12367037
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-1143:
-
did you test the nightly build?
this component is in change... dojo will be used asap
> InputSuggestAjax does no
InputSuggestAjax should allow differentiation between text in popup and text in
input box
-
Key: MYFACES-1145
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1145
Project: MyFaces
year is not displayed correctly when using inputCalendar component on 2
portlets in 1 page
--
Key: MYFACES-1144
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1144
Project: MyFaces
InputSuggestAjax does not handle < and > correctly
--
Key: MYFACES-1143
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1143
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: Sandbox
Reporter: Jean-Claude Pace
When usi
Wow that seems really complicated. I have serious concerns about last
minute search and replace on the source code. There's got to be a
easier solution. Until we started down the maven path we were fine
with the way it is. Lets re-examine why we are considering this in
the first place.
Manfred
> The call is required in the setUp() method to make things work correctly on
> the *first* test, when you have the MyFaces implementation in the classpath
> of the tests. Calling it in tearDown() doesn't hurt anything, but protects
> test developers who try to subvert the JUnit test lifecycle stu
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1140?page=comments#action_12367028
]
Dave commented on MYFACES-1140:
---
great!
It means that I can do the following:
In case of validation error, the label will be used, like:
Color: value is required
wher
Collapsing node after deleting all its subnodes
---
Key: MYFACES-1142
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1142
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: Tomahawk
Environment: Tomcat 5.5.9
Reporter: Micha
55 matches
Mail list logo
