[jira] Created: (TOBAGO-108) All derived classes of UIInput should support converter

2006-08-02 Thread Bernd Bohmann (JIRA)
All derived classes of UIInput should support converter - Key: TOBAGO-108 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-108 Project: MyFaces Tobago Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-467) SEVERE: Row is not available. Rowindex = 4

2006-08-02 Thread Eugene Schava (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-467?page=comments#action_12425182 ] Eugene Schava commented on TOMAHAWK-467: I can add on this issue that I have 2 tables on the page, but log error message shows only for second table.

[WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Manfred Geiler
Hi MyFaces community, Please welcome our new MyFaces committers Çagatay Çivici (cagatay) and Lance Frohman (lfrohman)! They both have been very active contributors during the last weeks, so the PMC decided to invite them as new committers. Çagatay and Lance, nice to have you aboard! Regards,

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Thomas Spiegl
Hi Çagatay Lance, welcome to the Apache MyFaces team! Thomas On 8/2/06, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi MyFaces community, Please welcome our new MyFaces committers Çagatay Çivici (cagatay) and Lance Frohman (lfrohman)! They both have been very active contributors during the last

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1374) Using selectBooleanCheckbox with binding attribute causes Expected submitted value of type Boolean exception

2006-08-02 Thread Ken Lowther (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1374?page=comments#action_12425227 ] Ken Lowther commented on MYFACES-1374: -- I forgot to mention that even when I change the three pages with the selectBooleanCheckbox to their original state

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-576) getLastClickedDateAndTime doesn't work in Month view

2006-08-02 Thread Peter Mahoney (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-576?page=comments#action_12425228 ] Peter Mahoney commented on TOMAHAWK-576: This is likely to be a duplicate of TOMAHAWK-506, for which a patch has been supplied.

Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Thomas Spiegl
I will add facelets support to MyFaces tomahawk. Here my suggestions: Tomahawk Facelets classes (TagHandlers, etc.) go to folder: tomahawk/core/src/main/java package: org.apache.myfaces.custom.facelets Tomahawk Facelets Taglib resides in folder: tomahawk/core/src/main/resources-facelets

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1374) Using selectBooleanCheckbox with binding attribute causes Expected submitted value of type Boolean exception

2006-08-02 Thread Ken Lowther (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1374?page=comments#action_12425234 ] Ken Lowther commented on MYFACES-1374: -- It would probably help more if I posted the root exception instead of the one I posted:

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-578) Scheduler click is not working n IE

2006-08-02 Thread Alejandro Garcia (JIRA)
Scheduler click is not working n IE --- Key: TOMAHAWK-578 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-578 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Issue Type: Test Components: Schedule Affects Versions:

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
hi Çagatay Lance welcome aborad On 8/2/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Çagatay Lance, welcome to the Apache MyFaces team! Thomas On 8/2/06, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi MyFaces community, Please welcome our new MyFaces committers Çagatay Çivici (cagatay) and

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 8/2/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will add facelets support to MyFaces tomahawk. Here my suggestions: Tomahawk Facelets classes (TagHandlers, etc.) go to folder: tomahawk/core/src/main/java +1 package: org.apache.myfaces.custom.facelets -1 I prefere

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Dennis Byrne
Welcome to MyFaces, Çagatay and Lance. Çagatay, what is the correct pronunciation of your name? Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2006 07:35 AM To: 'MyFaces Development' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Dennis, cut n paste ? :) On 8/2/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Welcome to MyFaces, Çagatay and Lance. Çagatay, what is the correct pronunciation of your name? Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2006

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Dennis Byrne
Pronunciation is how it sounds. I'm pretty sure his mother does not call him cut n paste :) Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2006 12:51 PM To: 'MyFaces Development' Subject: Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay,

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
lol :) Was speaking about the Ç :) I am wondering who Manfred wrote this with his. I haven't such a char on my keyboard. On 8/2/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pronunciation is how it sounds. I'm pretty sure his mother does not call him cut n paste :) Dennis Byrne -Original

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Manfred Geiler
no prob for me on my spiffy touch screen: I painted this char by hand! keyboards are old school... :-) Manfred On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lol :) Was speaking about the Ç :) I am wondering who Manfred wrote this with his. I haven't such a char on my keyboard.

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Last time I heard you speaking about old school was you said server side state saving is old school. :) On 8/2/06, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no prob for me on my spiffy touch screen: I painted this char by hand! keyboards are old school... :-) Manfred On 8/2/06, Matthias

Re: [Tests] Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
This means that we can't release Tomahawk until the dependency is final. Shouldn't be a problem at the rate we're going these days ... Sean On 8/1/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I asked b/c of the -SNAPSHOT :) On 8/1/06, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't see

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
Can you give an example of a class that is a problem and how you propose to fix it? I'm not terribly familiar with facelets but I was able to get tree2 working without adding special facelets packages. There were just some differences in properties and how facelets expected to find them. Sean

Re: [Tests] Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Craig is about to release 1.0.3 On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This means that we can't release Tomahawk until the dependency is final. Shouldn't be a problem at the rate we're going these days ... Sean On 8/1/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you give an example of a class that is a problem and how you propose to fix it? I'm not terribly familiar with facelets but I was able to get tree2 working without adding special facelets packages. There were just some differences in

Re: Core 1.1.4

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 8/1/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK I am doing a quick test of the core release candidate using the link from the wiki. In the meantime, should we release the shared dependency? This really needs to come first. Ideally we could release it to the myfaces internal repo for

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Also pure jsp tags (like t:updateActionListener) also have to be rewritten as a facelets tag handlers. yes, we have handlers for that in Trinidad too. -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-523) rowStyleClass does not resolve to an EL of var

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-523?page=comments#action_12425326 ] Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-523: It'll be fixed when someone who needs it badly enough submits a patch :-) That's the open source way

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Tobago has some facelets *specials* too On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also pure jsp tags (like t:updateActionListener) also have to be rewritten as a facelets tag handlers. yes, we have handlers for that in Trinidad too. -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf further

Re: [WELCOME] MyFaces += (Cagatay, Lance)

2006-08-02 Thread Cagatay Civici
Hello,This is why I always prefer Cagatay :)The pronunciation is something like Chagatai.Also the g in the middle is actually have a tiny dash on it but nevermind :)Cheers, Cagatay

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1372) h:messages not shown (- not working)

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1372?page=comments#action_12425358 ] Mike Kienenberger commented on MYFACES-1372: I noticed something that might be related last week. What happens if you set globalOnly=true? Does

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1372) h:messages not shown (- not working)

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1372?page=comments#action_12425361 ] Mike Kienenberger commented on MYFACES-1372: I don't have the RI installed anywhere, but I really wonder what the RI behavior is for globalOnly

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-566) groupBy doesn't work with commandLink

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-566?page=comments#action_12425374 ] Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-566: Are you saying that the issue is closed or simply correcting your problem description example?

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
If we design our MyFaces components right, the only component classes that will need facelets tag handlers are those with method bindings. The method binding method signature for an attribute has be specified in a facelets component tag handler. Well lets make sure we do this part whenever

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we design our MyFaces components right, the only component classes that will need facelets tag handlers are those with method bindings. The method binding method signature for an attribute has be specified in a facelets component tag

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
For most of the remaining problem components, it's simply a matter of taking care of the generic attributes and making them explicit html attributes like you did for tree2. OK so there's not much of a need for this new package directory but we do need it in a few limited cases right? The only

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For most of the remaining problem components, it's simply a matter of taking care of the generic attributes and making them explicit html attributes like you did for tree2. OK so there's not much of a need for this new package directory but

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I remember seeing that Manfred had resurrected the code generator before I left on vacation. Just stumbled across the JIRA issue while looking at another. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1284

Re: Core 1.1.4

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
Already found at least one major bug (MYFACES-1376). Lets do some decent testing and make sure that at least the simple examples work properly. This was the first example I tried and it failed. I'm sure there are more. Sean On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/1/06,

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-1376) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example

2006-08-02 Thread sean schofield (JIRA)
getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example --- Key: MYFACES-1376 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1376 Project: MyFaces Core Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-579) java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been called for this response error using the RI 1.2_01 and Tomahawk 1.1.3

2006-08-02 Thread Bryan Hansen (JIRA)
java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been called for this response error using the RI 1.2_01 and Tomahawk 1.1.3 -

IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
We are majorly bogged down on the Core 1.1.4 release. We need *everyone* to do what they can to help get this release out the door. Please see the wiki[1] and test the release candidate there. A good start is to build the simple examples in the tomahawk HEAD and replace the myfaces core jars

Re: [Tests] Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
I know and we're nowhere near releasing tomahawk at this rate so we should be fine. On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig is about to release 1.0.3 On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This means that we can't release Tomahawk until the dependency is

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1376) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example

2006-08-02 Thread sean schofield (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1376?page=comments#action_12425401 ] sean schofield commented on MYFACES-1376: - schedule1.jsf component is also experiencing this problem when you try to advance the calendar

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-1376) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example

2006-08-02 Thread Michael Hartman (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1376?page=all ] Michael Hartman updated MYFACES-1376: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example ---

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-1376) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example

2006-08-02 Thread sean schofield (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1376?page=all ] sean schofield updated MYFACES-1376: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example ---

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1376) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example

2006-08-02 Thread sean schofield (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1376?page=comments#action_12425406 ] sean schofield commented on MYFACES-1376: - Apparently Michael Hartman marked this as patch available but I don't see one. Changing status back to

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are majorly bogged down on the Core 1.1.4 release. We need *everyone* to do what they can to help get this release out the door. Please see the wiki[1] and test the release candidate there. A good start is to build the simple examples in

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
Given how the last few releases have been very embarassing we need to thoroughly test this puppy - and more then two or three people need to test it. As for the getScrolling issue, I could've sworn this worked in the latest simple examples *before* I switched in the rc core api jars. Maybe I'm

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I think this issue might also affect h:dataTable since it's in the shared package: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-467 I'll try testing and seeing if this is true. If so, the patch there needs to be applied, and I'll try to get to that tomorrow if no one else takes care of it by

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know everyone is busy (myself included) but a few people have been doing most of the heavy lifting for a long time now. We've added a bunch of new committers lately and we have lots of old ones who aren't doing very much to help. Lets step

[jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-467) SEVERE: Row is not available. Rowindex = 4

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-467?page=all ] Mike Kienenberger updated TOMAHAWK-467: --- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Mike Kienenberger

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this issue might also affect h:dataTable since it's in the shared package: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-467 I'll try testing and seeing if this is true. If so, the patch there needs to be applied, and I'll try to

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-1377) h:dataTable with t:dataScroller generates Row is not available. Rowindex =# errors on non-full pages.

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)
h:dataTable with t:dataScroller generates Row is not available. Rowindex =# errors on non-full pages. --- Key: MYFACES-1377 URL:

MyFaces-1377 Minor 1.1.4 issue - [Was: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers]

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I have opened http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1377 on this. However, I've marked it priority Minor since it only generates an error message rather than breaking functionality. Since the patch is committed to head, I'm not sure what the process is for backporting it to 1.1.4 or even

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Sounds good Mike! On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this issue might also affect h:dataTable since it's in the shared package: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-467 I'll try testing and seeing

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1376) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example

2006-08-02 Thread Dennis Byrne (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1376?page=comments#action_12425423 ] Dennis Byrne commented on MYFACES-1376: --- There were a ton of users on the users list who had the problem but nobody could trace it down. I was one of

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1372) h:messages not shown (- not working)

2006-08-02 Thread Wolf Benz (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1372?page=comments#action_12425425 ] Wolf Benz commented on MYFACES-1372: @ Mike: setting globalOnly=true (smth I had already tried after reading another bug) didn't change anything. I've

Re: MyFaces-1377 Minor 1.1.4 issue - [Was: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers]

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have opened http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1377 on this. However, I've marked it priority Minor since it only generates an error message rather than breaking functionality. Since the patch is committed to head, I'm not sure

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Sean Schofield
Why not apply it to 1.1.4 branch and merge it down? Eventually we need to merge everything down. My vote is to fix it once merge it the second time. But I don't know the nature of the fix so maybe I'm way off here. Sean On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds good

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Ok, I used the given 1.1.4-CORE RC JARS and tested it against Trinidad. It works for me! I also remember, that Craig tested them in the past (yes, 1.1.4-core RC) against shale. So, now next is tomahawk-head (1.1.5) and the 1.1.4-core RC -Matthias On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Yes, I know... there is also the Trinidad maven-faces-plugin. On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I remember seeing that Manfred had resurrected the code generator before I left on vacation. Just stumbled across

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, now next is tomahawk-head (1.1.5) and the 1.1.4-core RC no link was clickable... for the example I clicked ... checking more on that -Matthias On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are majorly bogged down on the

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1376) getScrolling is not defined in simple tree2 example

2006-08-02 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1376?page=comments#action_12425433 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-1376: - These page have also the same problem click on HOME for http://localhost:8080/myfaces/sample1.jsf

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
svn commit: r421297 that causes the troubles for the current *branch* I try to apply that into branch -Matt On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, now next is tomahawk-head (1.1.5) and the 1.1.4-core RC no link

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Ok, I patched two files from: -core branch -shared branch problem solvred (getScrolling ...) -Matthias On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: svn commit: r421297 that causes the troubles for the current *branch* I try to apply that into branch -Matt On 8/2/06, Matthias

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
As for the getScrolling issue, I could've sworn this worked in the latest simple examples *before* I switched in the rc core api jars. Maybe I'm wrong though ... I will try to investigate further. with 1.1.5 yes; the getScrolling is now named org_apache_myfaces_getScrolling that was committed

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
@Tomahawk_1_1_4 branch: works, when you compile against the *patched* shared-203 On 8/2/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for the getScrolling issue, I could've sworn this worked in the latest simple examples *before* I switched in the rc core api jars. Maybe I'm wrong

Re: Core 1.1.4

2006-08-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Yes, you were right. All was broken, or almost all. I committed two files to the branch (core114 + shared203). Wendy provides a new RC jar for core 114 (build against the patched shared203) We should get that guy out of the door. My tomahawk testing result. core 114 + tomahawk 114 = good core