[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Curtiss Howard updated MYFACES-2286:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
javax.faces.view.facelets TODOs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-1524:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.12-core
Status:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12730835#action_12730835
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on TRINIDAD-1524:
--
created spec ticket:
convert renderer proxy to the new storage mechanism
---
Key: EXTVAL-52
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-52
Project: MyFaces Extensions Validator
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-52?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved EXTVAL-52.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT
2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
MyFaces version 1.2.X uncommented a couple lines of code that exist but are
commented-out in Myfaces 1.1.X- I am trying to find out why these lines are
'uncommented' in Myfaces 1.2.X because they cause a breakage when using a
ServletWrapper (such as coherence*web in our case). i am trying to
t:selectOneRadio is broken when migrating from 1.1.8 to 1.1.9
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-1438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1438
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12730947#action_12730947
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-84:
-
Look the log or the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12730955#action_12730955
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on TOMAHAWK-1438:
--
I don't think it is broken. Just
Hi
In 1.2.x a new web.xml context param
org.apache.myfaces.DELEGATE_FACES_SERVLET was introduced to normalize what
to do when people uses a Servlet wrapper. Just point it to your server
wrapper class name.
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2234
This type of questions goes on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12730984#action_12730984
]
Jan-Kees van Andel commented on MYFACES-2272:
-
Already working on it as part
Implement Bean Validation
-
Key: MYFACES-2288
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2288
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: JSR-314
Reporter: Jan-Kees van
Matthias,
This is slightly wrong for a couple of reasons:
1) We need to gather up all of the required whitespace, which can be
more than one character and could be characters other than space
2) We need to ensure that the required whitespace was present before we
called trim
-- Blake
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Blake
Sullivanblake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote:
Matthias,
This is slightly wrong for a couple of reasons:
1) We need to gather up all of the required whitespace, which can be more
than one character and could be characters other than space
2) We need to ensure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731060#action_12731060
]
Jan-Kees van Andel commented on MYFACES-2280:
-
I can pick this up as part of
GenericFacesPortlet.doDispatch() has bad mode equality check
Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-85
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-85
Project: MyFaces Portlet Bridge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731123#action_12731123
]
reverttoconsole commented on TOMAHAWK-1438:
---
I added a label, there's no
Extra parameters on a viewId can cause view target miss on subsequent request
and hence a restore view fail
---
Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-86
URL:
getActionURL doesn't encode extra params correctly if the actionURl returned
from the delegation returns a queryString
--
Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-87
ExternalContext.encodeActionURL doesn't parse portlet: URLs correctly
-
Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-88
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-88
Project: MyFaces Portlet
ExternalContext.encodeActionURL incorrectly encodes invalid portletMode
---
Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-89
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-89
Project: MyFaces Portlet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Freedman reopened PORTLETBRIDGE-84:
---
Submitted fix is only a partial fix. Though it correctly checks for o
adjust the package structure in view of the new storage mechanism
-
Key: EXTVAL-53
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-53
Project: MyFaces Extensions Validator
Build failure due to missing symbol FacesContext.setCurrentPhaseId()
Key: MYFACES-2289
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2289
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue
Add OSGi bundle information and bundle classloader / activator
--
Key: MYFACES-2290
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2290
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: New
Bernhard Huemer schrieb:
Hi again,
Hope you have recovered and all is well.
Thanks, I'm fine at the moment. :-D
Here you are talking about using Facelets as a bundle, which is another
story. My mail referred to modifications to MyFaces Core and Trinidad.
My expression some modifications is
26 matches
Mail list logo
