Jacob Zwiers created TOMAHAWK-1627:
--
Summary: Source Not Available From Mirror Sites
Key: TOMAHAWK-1627
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1627
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12702731#action_12702731
]
Jacob Nordfalk commented on TRINIDAD-458:
-
(I've also sent th
bean_fromDate;
}
Please tell me how to get access to the renderer of the bean.
Thanks!
Jacob
2009/4/22 Matthias Wessendorf
> yes, see here:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--How-to-control-%3Ctr:chooseDate-%3E%27s-starting-date--p23138122.html
>
> I repl
Hi, I wonder if the list has recieved this?
Am I posting on the rignt list?
(I haven't recieved any reaction)
Jacob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jacob Nordfalk
Date: 2009/4/20
Subject: [Trinidad] How to control 's starting date?
To: MyFaces Development
Dea
but it doesent work too well, also not if I include
document.myForm.fromDateyear.onchange();
document.myForm.fromDatemonth.onchange();
Thanks
Jacob Nordfalk
More info:
"> Currently, date picker init itself to the current date (unless there's a
DateTimeRangeValidator preventing
d developer and the product is in production I am
looking for a Javascript workaround (rather than having to patch the
Trinidad code).
Thanks
Jacob Nordfalk
More info:
"> Currently, date picker init itself to the current date (unless there's a
DateTimeRangeValidator preventing it).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12700690#action_12700690
]
Jacob Nordfalk commented on TRINIDAD-458:
-
It's a big annoyance that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12595230#action_12595230
]
Thomas Jacob commented on TRINIDAD-73:
--
... sorry, I forgot the exception try-c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12595228#action_12595228
]
Thomas Jacob commented on TRINIDAD-978:
---
Sorry, but the fix in TRINIDAD-73
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12595227#action_12595227
]
Thomas Jacob commented on TRINIDAD-73:
--
Sorry, but the fix does not work.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568941#action_12568941
]
Jacob Avlund commented on TRINIDAD-814:
---
I agree, would be very nice - an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568941#action_12568941
]
avlund edited comment on TRINIDAD-814 at 2/14/08 6:21 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12557328#action_12557328
]
Benjamin Jacob commented on TOBAGO-587:
---
1.0.11 and 1.0.12 didn't alrea
Print pages
---
Key: TOBAGO-589
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-589
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Benjamin Jacob
We need a possibility to print displayed Data in an easy
Ajax timeout is hardcoded
-
Key: TOBAGO-588
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-588
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.0.12
Reporter: Benjamin Jacob
Ajax
Suggest on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-587
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Bug
Environment: FireFox &IE
Reporter: Benjamin Jacob
positions of the autoSuggest box are calculated wrong if the suggestbox is
rendered within a
I think the Caucho guys already committed this feature to JSF 2.0...
I committed this to Tomahawk a few weeks ago.
Dennis Byrne
On 10/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,
do you guys plan to support converters for the Numbers in package
"java.util.concurrent.atomic", like
Did commons-el pick up the apache-el to bring it to JSR standard for JEE 5?
Martin wrote:
===
sure!
regards,
Martin
On 7/5/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As of jsf 1.2 the unified expression language is used, so when using
> 1.2 it mak
fwiw -- hibernate has the same behavior when assigning primitives from null
values in a resultset.
Mike wrote:
Well, I'd say because there's no guarantee that mapping 0 to null is a
good choice.
It may be that the next user wants null mapped to -1.
My su
revision of JSF. You
guys are the ones using JSF daily on projects and are in the best possible
position to offer feedback for the EG to work on solving.
Note, replying here isn't going to make it's way to the EG-- please comment on
Ed's blog or in the wiki (preferred).
Thanks Everyone!
Jacob Hookom
this
through an injection API which other 'legacy' APIs can simply defer to
(Similar to ELResolver).
It is tricky from a JSF standpoint, especially with session clustering--
but would WeakReference with your own ReferenceQueue fix this problem of
associating the @PreDestroy event?
I would avoid any nouns associated with 'heavy', I think it's contradictory to
what Fusion is attempting to do.
Stick to:
http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/fusion
>2 more ...
>
>Apache MyFaces Cement
>Apache MyFaces Plaster
>
>
>On 2/28/07, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, nix
If determining all possible object compositions doesn't work-- what
about piggy backing on JBoss's work and do something at the
ObjectOutputStream level?
Martin Haimberger wrote:
Hy Jacob,
you are right. This is an old artifact and i will remove.
Thanks for looking
Nice Rega
This seams a bit odd:
private TreeStructComponent
internalBuildInitalTreeStructureToSave(UIComponent
component,FacesContext facesContext, Object state, int childIndex)
{
Object myState = null;
Map facetStateMap = null;
List childrenStateList = null;
if (state
If you are using jspx compilation, use 'and' instead of '&&' in EL
Volker Weber (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475034 ]
Volker Weber commented on TOBAGO-287:
---
I might be missing the scope of everything, but just on initial glance:
ServletResponse response = (ServletResponse)
externalContext.getResponse();
ServletRequest request = (ServletRequest) externalContext.getRequest();
Locale locale = viewToRender.getLocale();
Where's your ViewHandler code for 1.2? Hi devs,I have been spending some time trying to implement org.apache.myfaces.application.jsp.JspViewHandlerImpl, which is the myfaces implementation for the ViewHandler. As you might know, now the viewhandler is the responsible of invoking the renderers (invo
you always added the same components-- allowing optimization of
savestate for redundancy of components).
Jacob Hookom wrote:
It would be fine, just not included in the eden state-- Facelets would
provide the eden state, then at the time of savestate, it would be
compared to the passed component
state saved. This is especially true for partial
requests.
Martin Marinschek wrote:
I wonder how we can handle the case of adding components
programmatically with this approach.
@Jacob: Have you thought up a solution for this?
regards,
Martin
On 12/22/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL P
;
>Or would a JSF implementation work to become 1.2A compatible after 1.2 then
>call themselves a 1.2A-compliant spec?
>
>
>
>
>Jacob Hookom wrote:
>>
>> I, personally, find reading the specifications to be the easiest route--
>> check out JSR 252 at the JCP
-- Jacob
>
>Ok, I'll look at the source and see what I come up with. Could somebody
>please provide guidance as to how to get started (as I've never seriously
>looked at code for a real program and knew what I was doing...)
>
>I saw the wiki page that somebody pos
,
the mailing list form break the whole form when you were trying to submit
only the login form -- because it's all one big form now?
Jacob Hookom wrote:
JSF 1.2 standardized on the identifier: javax.faces.ViewState, previous
versions of JSF 1.1 (myfaces and RI) each had their own identifi
JSF 1.2 standardized on the identifier: javax.faces.ViewState, previous
versions of JSF 1.1 (myfaces and RI) each had their own identifiers
which caused difficulties for component developers
lightbulb432 wrote:
What is the purpose of the hidden field named javax.faces.ViewState, and how
does i
...)
jsf_sequence may be used or rendered for other reasons, but i don't
think it's necessary to supplement client-side statesaving since the
rendered Base64 string *is* the viewstate and not just some identifier.
-- Jacob
Thanks a lot.
Jacob Hookom wrote:
If it'
IComponent counterparts in a single request/response, while
keeping within the full JEE stack on the server--
-- Jacob
Thomas Spiegl wrote:
Maybe you can take a look at the Trinidad approach. I think Trinidad
solves state-saving more effective than tomahawk or myfaces does.
On 12/20/06,
If it's like the RI, the reasoning is to accommodate the back button issue with
server-side state saving. It would be wrong to assume/associate a single state
with a page given multiple windows and back button use. Using a sequence adds
a level of uniqueness to state which is equal to 'page +
I might be biased too from the Seam side, but writing this, even in small steps
may grow into a monster :-) I can see committing to only an implicit flash
scope (90% of the cases-- and very useful), but pursuing full conversation
management and transactions without an actual separate project ma
Oh, thanks!
>Hi Jacob!
>> how's JSF 1.2 coming along btw?
>>
>What do you mean?
>
>As far as I can see JSF 1.2. do not introduce any new (flash or
>conversation) scope.
>So (IMHO) our solution works with JSF 1.2 too.
>
>If you mean how far our (My
how's JSF 1.2 coming along btw?
>Hi!
>> as you may know seam also has its own phase listener and bean
>> managment facility.
>Having a phase listener does not necessarily mean we break the JSF
>lifecycle or something else.
>
>> can seam users also continue using myfaces?
>definitely: Yes!
>MyFac
: 1.1.4
Reporter: Jacob Scherrer
A navigation rule bug is present in
NavigationHandlerImpl.calcMatchingNavigationCase(..)
The bug occurs in the following situation:
given the following navigation rules:
/foo.jsp
success
/bar.jsp
I do have 5 kegs coming for my wedding this weekend ;-)
I am checking with Ryan Lubke about getting a wiki started at
javaserverfaces-spec-public for ideas from users/developers for JSF 2.0, I'm
sure something would work at apache too :-)
>It's a pity that you can't be arou
ction like the other APIs, or via the filter pattern, passing in a
pointer to the children when you process a given event.
It'd be cool if Sun started a JSF 2.0 project on Java.net to start publishing
ideas in wiki format to get better community input.
-- Jacob
>Hi there,
>
>Ed Bu
The UIViewRoot unique id must be persisted to guarantee that no matter the
state saving lifecycle of the component tree, that the UIViewRoot can always
produce a unique ID, despite changes to the structure of the view at 'build
time'.
I understand what you are going for with Verbatims and uniqu
ght even have originated the idea :-) >
Actually, Clay was sitting in a bugzilla ticket as a proposed enhancement to the shale subview component before Jacob started facelets (http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2005/04/javaserver_face_1.html).
Clay also builds the tree before renderi
The goal with JSF 1.2's rendering is that the ViewHandler, while it
builds the view, shouldn't render anything at all. So using JSP as your
view or Facelets as your view, the act of evaluating those artifacts
shouldn't push anything to the response.
Once you have the full component tree from
STL/Control tags in
the page.
Facelets instead sets a unique Attribute on the UIComponent, leaving
the actual ID up to the UIViewRoot/Impl.
-- Jacob
>Yes, my qualm is with the 'jsp' prefix. My problem is that (even though
>it would be good if we didn't) we have many automat
It looks like you have a good usecase setup for showing the error, but I
don't think the selectOneRadio component should enforce the use of a
converter if the value is not a string-- EL can handle putting anything
to a String without explicit converters.
[cc'ing MyFaces Dev]
-- J
That's brilliantly cool!
>Hey folks,
>
>on the ADF Faces lists (see [1] for howto subscribe) is a discussion
>about SVG Chart renderers. I uploaded a plain html example to [2],
>that I got from Venkata.
>
>I hope this is interesting for some of you.
>
>-Matthias
>
>[1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfac
tead sets a unique Attribute on the UIComponent, leaving the actual
ID up to the UIViewRoot/Impl.
-- Jacob
>Yes, my qualm is with the 'jsp' prefix. My problem is that (even though
>it would be good if we didn't) we have many automated tests that have
>been written using the old i
Unique Id generation aside, I think the qualm was with the 'jsp' prefix
in the generated IDs. I know that JSP 2.1 has the ability to assign ids
unique to a tag on a page, but that's different than what you are
describing.
Martin Marinschek wrote:
The problem is that there is a bug in the spe
-SNAPSHOT
Environment: Facelets, JBoss Seam
Reporter: Jacob Hookom
Priority: Blocker
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/shared/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/shared/renderkit/html/HtmlResponseWriterImpl.java?view=markup
Sometimes ResponseWriters are used to supplement
11/06, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1
1.2 setPropertyActionListener will be using value/target, otherwise
there would be 3 different sets of nouns to associate with this
functionality
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hey,
>
> I'd like to rename the value/property attri
-1
1.2 setPropertyActionListener will be using value/target, otherwise
there would be 3 different sets of nouns to associate with this
functionality
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
hey,
I'd like to rename the value/property attributes to from/to.
Makes more sense to me. since this tag is used
I'm not sure this route would work in a clustered environment-- or server
restarts.
>I am not sure about this. You can always stick it in app scope. I am curious
>about the work needed to keep the mapping data in sync with the component
>config data, as there is a lot of work being done alrea
must be the anti-alaskan filter that they installed last weekend...
>Still no luck ...
>
>ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] works , but the same password will not get me past
>https://svn.apache.org/change-password ( using dennisbyrne and
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] as the username ).
>
>Dennis Byrne
>
>>-Origin
I should mention that TC 6 Jasper was implemented with the unified EL to
a point where the RI 1.2 demos ran fine and development of .tag files
with the new EL also worked with JSF 1.2
Stan Silvert wrote:
Most of what I did relies on Unified EL. In fact, the EL integration is
completely done
I think it depends on the classloader... I wonder if the fact that you
can specify an alternate Lifecycle on the FacesServlet mapping would
allow you to hijack the implementation on a per webapp basis with JSF 1.2.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
that's my understanding as well.
the only "proble
Stan's cycles aside, it's probably just a case of JBoss wanting to have
all of their ducks in order for their next AS release. Going with the
'stable' RI 1.2 right now is one issue they don't need to worry about in
the immediate future.
That's not to say that JBoss couldn't easily switch over
,
all files have been relicensed. There's still a few dependencies that
need to be cleared up as far as Maven repositories go, though all
should be legit by Apache rules as I understand them:
- Facelets: I need to nag Jacob into pushing this into a repository
- javax.el: Matthias gave me a li
ing with Facelets, Rick Hightower published something similar
>at IBM:
>>
>>http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-facelets/index.html
>>
>>He says he has another article on the topic coming out soon.
>>
>>Overall, the need you are describing is
va/library/j-facelets/index.html
He says he has another article on the topic coming out soon.
Overall, the need you are describing is obviously there. I wish JBoss would've
pursued this route more actively with Seam's UI library.
-- Jacob
>
>Hello. It is not a comlete proposal,
rver to return a 204 (no body) instead of a 200.
I have been using the response header as a "poor man's Map" for a few months w/
non-faces and faces requests and it hasn't bit me yet.
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
ity changes that invokes a
ValueChangeListener on the
>> >server, which does two things:
>> >>
>> >> 1) Tells JSF to re-render the div for order total
>> >> 2) Possibly report/re-render issues with that line item,
such as B/O
be an order entry system where you assign JS event
>> >listeners to quantity changes that invokes a ValueChangeListener on the
>> >server, which does two things:
>> >>
>> >> 1) Tells JSF to re-render the div for order total
>> >> 2) Possibly report/
t/re-render issues with that line item, such as B/O status
>> 3) Push JavaScript to the client to highlight the quantity area
>>
>> In the case of 1 and 2, they would be written to the response headers,
>allowing the ValueChangeListener to write whatever JS, JSON, XML, or HTML i
er to write whatever JS, JSON, XML, or HTML it wants to
without being tied to the rules of UIComponent's encoding strategy.
-- Jacob
>Jacob (as he pointed out above) came up with what I think a rather
>clever idea - using multiple HTTP response headers to embed
>the multiple respo
face that must
be implemented, especially at the component level, is,
IMO, undesirable - the approach Jacob suggests is more
flexible.
> 2. The responsibility for rendering the response
> should lie entirely with the component. The current
> code does something like this:
>
> out.print(
I like the idea of convetion a lot more with components here-- because
you aren't directly invoking your business model, you can do more with
convention without security issues such that all you would have to do is:
// JAVA - on the Renderer
public Object onSuggest(FacesContext faces, UICompone
onents
3) Currently exploring automatic JSON integration and DojoComponents
Martin Marinschek wrote:
There is also one approach shown to me by Jacob. - Hmm, Jacob, can I
go out and tell about it, or do you want to do that only on J1?
regards,
Martin
On 4/29/06, Ernst Fastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and pushing the
JSF solution back to where we were with JSP 2.0 and JSF 1.1 issues
again with the disconnect.
Jacob,
It might surprise you to hear *me* say something like this, but the
entire AJAX world does *not* revolve around JSF :-0.
Don't get me wrong. The use cases for
Wouldn't this solvable by including Martin's visitor example for JSF 2.0 as a
phase listener instead of explicitying writing hooks everywhere?
>On 4/27/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> > I don't see that as a major problem, but it's simple to fix if it is.
>Just
>
The same problem arises with JSP use-- the compilation is permanently retained in memory. If you are doing that, you may need customize the DefaultFaceletFactory. On 4/27/06, Gethin Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am urgently trying to find out how and where Facelet file
ha
I think the approaches of the blueprint components are highly faulty-- especially with the use of dojo.bind. You are dealing with pure URI negotiation which is orthogonal to the communication capabilities of JSF. Example, the autocomplete example uses Shale Remoting via an EL _expression_-- but d
ee, and you can re-render the one JSF component
without evaluating/buffering any other content.
-- Jacob
Sean
--
--
Sent from my FrankenBerry Wireless Handheld
One thing you could also promote is to stick to classes for styling--
the 37Signals guys do this, leaving identifiers up to server-side code
and promoting re-use of content.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
damn,
just tested. Firefox shows the div as green, but IE not.
thanks for pointing it out,
What you are describing is basically what Facelets does-- except it builds a static node tree instead of compiled Java source. FYI, I've been working on Tomcat 6's Jasper compiler and it *is* scary.
>From: "Adam Winer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> On 4/18/06, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > > > >From: "Martin
>Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
>> But I admit having to write the html markup in an renderer is a pain.
>> What about a html2jsf converter which takes a html input file and
>> generates the out.write stuff?
>> Should be possible.
That's basically what Facelets does, except it's an xml2jsf converter.
d anything from your original document, just gotten
shared references, which less overhead on the server.
-- Jacob
Martin Marinschek wrote:
Facelets are faster - the JSP overhead goes with them. Adam quoted 14%
speed gains by using Facelets.
regards,
Martin
On 4/18/06, Mario Ivankovits <[
Spring can all provide behavior from different contexts,
coordinated
> by vistors in the form of ELResolvers which provides a *very*
flexible way of
> mapping back to models within MVC. Now lets do the same for MVC
controllers.
>
> -- Jacob
>
> >Jacob Hookom wrote:
> >> The
thin other frameworks today.I still have to take a look at Shale to see how the interceptors/dialogs are handled.-- Jacob On 4/10/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jacob Hookom wrote:> The NavigationHandler has that default behavior. But much like WebWork> allows the pluggable Actio
of ELResolvers which provides a *very* flexible way of
mapping back to models within MVC. Now lets do the same for MVC controllers.
-- Jacob
>Jacob Hookom wrote:
>> The NavigationHandler has that default behavior. But much like WebWork
>> allows the pluggable ActionMapper, all par
implementation, there will always be a
need for true model 2 support, it's just a matter of how efficiently we
can integrate the two into a common mind share within JEE.
-- Jacob
Don
Sean Schofield wrote:
[Moving this aspect of the discussion from myfaces to struts list ...]
On
Covered here a bit:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jhook/archive/2006/03/the_new_servlet_1.html
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
what would be the representation used for a date/long/double in a
string? Can we look into the xsd definition for that? Would an xsd
type representation converter be a
tic and purely event driven. Use rich UIComponents for some pages, but go
model 2 for other types of requests, but all types can be handled by one
controller.
-- Jacob
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>> From experimenting with going stateless in JSF, and Adam's work on state
>s
#x27;-- components that exist, but don't render anything, so when generic
html posts, these invisible components would actually take care of processing
the request. In some ways, I think this might apply to restful types of calls.
-- Jacob
>Hi!
>
>Just to make sure we talk about the s
ting get's up front in
the UI. I've played around with doing specialized command components that
serialized contextual EL, but it just seems like a monstrosity that neither
felt like JSF or Struts in implementation.
-- Jacob
>> people would build stronger, more powerful
How are synchronization issues handled with any other AJAX RPC call back to
application state?
Maybe I'm not following-- are you talking about the browser state or the
serialized ViewState?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the ViewState is serialized, then we have the
luxury of clone by serial
Dennis Byrne wrote:
I guess I look at this stuff much differently with JSF. Watching Ted
Neward's interview on SOA
(http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=39757), it got
me thinking that these AJAX solutions are doomed to pursue the same route.
[OT]
I have only listened
rowser to send/coordinate
events with the server.
https://facelets.dev.java.net/source/browse/facelets/demo/avatar/web/?hideattic=0#dirlist
-- Jacob
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 4/3/06, *Dennis Byrne* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>Since you nev
This was brought up, but we were looking for a way to selectively
process known components (even to themselves) from the client. Kind of
riding the point that we can't externally provide a strategy to walk the
component tree, but needed something efficient without introducing a
full tree walk
L PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any way you guys could jump on the invokeOnComponent w/ Callbacks early from
>JSF 1.2 to get this system in place for all components now?
>
>Hey Jacob.
>
>I think it's already in MyFaces. Have you tried it?
Any way you guys could jump on the invokeOnComponent w/ Callbacks early from
JSF 1.2 to get this system in place for all components now?
>[
>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-224?page=comments#action_12372689
> ]
>
>Mario Ivankovits commented on TOMAHAWK-224:
>
ntation. A
UIComponentDynamicTag with the DyanmicAttributes contract would've made
dropping in new UIComponents so much easier, but now with the other default
'error when we see #{..}' in place, I don't know think even automating this
logic is even feasible.
-- Jacob
>
>I have to
Craig McClanahan wrote:
I was constrained in the stuff so far by what could be accomplished at
runtime -- and there's no way to define a tag library "on the fly" at
that point. But what you're describing could certainly be done by
processing annotations at compile time instead (using "apt"
I think it'd be cool to create another abstract type over UIComponentBase that will automate statesaving/el vs. explicit assignment, etc via annotations. It would make component developmet a bit easier. I think the key point is Martin's comment:"If the configuration is something that will change w
A lot of this is occurring with JSF 1.2 and the Avatar proposal for
partial processing of the component tree.
Oracle's ADF components too have the concept of triggers/observers today.
Travis Reeder wrote:
Hi all,
Been a bit out of the loop for the past few weeks, I am just wondering
if th
er with lots of
breaks in MyFaces (this doesn't happen in the RI).
--
Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
JSF-EG, JSF-RI, EL, Facelets
No, ours isn't on performance. I would only looking to be able to make
comparative statements on numbers as we're diving more into partial processing,
AJAX and future component development.
>Hi Jacob,
>
>yes, will do - we have a BOF on JSF performance - are you doing
Martin, will you be publishing those numbers or any comparative results that we
can use for J1 talks?
>Hi Alexander,
>
>thanks, we've already got it up and running. With proper settings,
>MyFaces can be pretty performant ;)
>
>regards,
>
>Martin
>
>On 3/14/06, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PR
in the validate phase.
Has anyone tried this yet? Would it be possible, and are there any
pitfalls?
regards,
Jurgen
--
Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
JSF-EG, JSF-RI, EL, Facelets
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
