Just a side note, we did not decide yet whether MyFaces commons will contain
a components' module or not. If yes then it will contains components that
does not have UI else the components will be promoted to Tomahawk.
I have a list of components (that have UI) that I will add soon to MyFaces
Tomaha
I agree with Simon here, it is confusing to mix the tomahawk as it sandbox
as they are not the same thing in my opinion. If they were, they should be
released together... and the sandbox is not meant to be released. It is
confusing to see that "this issue is fixed" when it does not appear in a
rele
The problem is that Leonardo generates the release-notes for Tomahawk
using a JIRA report. And this appears to be standard practice for many
myfaces projects.
So issues related to the sandbox then get listed in the Tomahawk
"release notes". This confuses users, particularly when a new feature
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This also demands a project site under
> >> "http://myfaces.apache.org/commons"; and a Commons logo of course. Any
> >> volunteers? ;-)
>
> Just saw that there IS already a site under
> http://myfaces.apache.org/commo
>> This also demands a project site under
>> "http://myfaces.apache.org/commons"; and a Commons logo of course. Any
>> volunteers? ;-)
Just saw that there IS already a site under http://myfaces.apache.org/commons/
Cool!
What's just missing is the menu entry on the main MyFaces page.
--Manfred
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Manfred Geiler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> But Sandbox IS a part of Tomahawk and not a single projec
+1
2008/10/14 Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2008/10/14 Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Any JIRA admins here?
> >>
> >> There currently is no JIRA project defined for the myfaces sandbox. It
>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But Sandbox IS a part of Tomahawk and not a single project, so I do
>> not see the problem here.
>> Sandbox issues SHOULD be filed using TO
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/10/14 Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Any JIRA admins here?
>>
>> There currently is no JIRA project defined for the myfaces sandbox. It
>> appears that people have simply been using TOMAHAWK to file bugs
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But Sandbox IS a part of Tomahawk and not a single project, so I do
> not see the problem here.
> Sandbox issues SHOULD be filed using TOMAHAWK and - of course - the
> regarding component ("SubForm", "PPRPanelGroup", ...).
But Sandbox IS a part of Tomahawk and not a single project, so I do
not see the problem here.
Sandbox issues SHOULD be filed using TOMAHAWK and - of course - the
regarding component ("SubForm", "PPRPanelGroup", ...).
-1 for a new Jira project(!)
--Manfred
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Simon
Hi,
2008/10/14 Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any JIRA admins here?
>
> There currently is no JIRA project defined for the myfaces sandbox. It
> appears that people have simply been using TOMAHAWK to file bugs against.
> But as recent releases has used a jira report as the "release notes" t
Any JIRA admins here?
There currently is no JIRA project defined for the myfaces sandbox. It
appears that people have simply been using TOMAHAWK to file bugs
against. But as recent releases has used a jira report as the "release
notes" this is causing confusion.
Can someone please create it?
13 matches
Mail list logo