Hi David,
You look at Espruino’s compiler, and it was clearly written in
a swashbuckling style:
Thanks for the links. At this point though my C knowledge isn't
sufficient to comment either way.
However, I will share that I have a class of 3-6 graders (22 kids aged
8-11 years), who are all
> Oracle happened. ;-)
got it, sorry about that.
Dave
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 1:46 PM, David G. Simmons wrote:
>
>> On May 28, 2016, at 4:23 PM, David Moshal wrote:
>>
>> thanks, I did not know about that project.
>> what happened to it?
>
> Oracle
> On May 28, 2016, at 4:23 PM, David Moshal wrote:
>
> thanks, I did not know about that project.
> what happened to it?
Oracle happened. ;-)
dg
--
David G. Simmons
(919) 534-5099
Web • Blog • Linkedin • Twitter • GitHub
/** Message digitally signed for security and
> On May 28, 2016, at 3:57 PM, David Moshal wrote:
>
> I don't know of any other embedded platform capable of supporting that
> use case, or that abuse, do you?
> I mean, that's literally the ultimate newbie scenario - completely new
> to programming!
Project Sun SPOT
> Incredibly useful advice, thank you.
You're welcome
Now, if I can just find some way to get up and running, I might be
able to help implement that!
> You look at Espruino’s compiler, and it was clearly written in
> a swashbuckling style:
Thanks for the links. At this point though my C
David, Sterling, let me throw in my 2 cents.
Firstly, Thank you David Simmons, it's really interesting to look at
it from the perspective of the original embedded Java efforts. I
recall following that project closely in the late 1990s.
In the case of Javascript though, I think the problem may be
also: as you look at this, if you need changes to newt (tool) or can
think of ways to have newt make bringing in 3rd party libraries easier,
feel free to ping dev@ (ideal) or me directly.
we enforce a directory structure on packages with newt, but that
doesn’t always need to be the case — we
I'm in, I agree that getting a JS interpreter up and running on MyNewt is a
good next step.
David
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Sterling Hughes
wrote:
> I'd like to echo the sentiments here: I think this would be great.
>
> I think good scripting language support is
This is fantastic! Glad to see so much enthusiasm for JavaScript on an IoT
device.
Here’s the thinking I have had on the subject, and why I have turned to MyNewt
to try to make it a reality. JavaScript is hugely popular, and resents a fairly
low-bar for entry into IoT development. JavaScript —
Oh, and on PlatformIO --
- They do have a build & package management system which has some of the
same functionality of newt.
- That said, it's mostly focused on their IDE.
- If we can make our stuff work more easily with Apache Mynewt -- I'm
all for it!
Sterling
On 5/26/16 12:19 AM,
I'd like to echo the sentiments here: I think this would be great.
I think good scripting language support is very important for Mynewt.
Most of the newer chipsets (like the NRF52), have enough RAM and Flash,
that you can run the OS, Bluetooth stack, and still have 256KB or more
left over for
11 matches
Mail list logo