Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-11-17 Thread Gyewon Lee
Hello, I've checked that we do not contain source code of CatB libraries. I think LC20 and LC30 are both okay. Best, Gyewon 2020년 11월 2일 (월) 오후 2:02, Gyewon Lee 님이 작성: > Hello, > > It seems that net-lib java, protobuf, and postgresql belong to CatA and > javax belongs to CatB. ( > https://issue

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-11-01 Thread Gyewon Lee
Hello, It seems that net-lib java, protobuf, and postgresql belong to CatA and javax belongs to CatB. ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LEGAL/issues/LEGAL-545?filter=allopenissues ) I will check out whether Nemo does not contain source code of CatB libraries (binary only). Thanks, Gyewon

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-11-01 Thread Gyewon Lee
Hi, I've posted a new question about 3rd party compatibility ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-545). I will be back when I get the reply. Thanks, Gyewon 2020년 10월 27일 (화) 오후 8:38, Jeongyoon Eo 님이 작성: > Hi, sorry for checking in late too! > > For QU40, I wrote a release note for our

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-27 Thread Jeongyoon Eo
Hi, sorry for checking in late too! For QU40, I wrote a release note for our past two releases, https://github.com/apache/incubator-nemo/releases/tag/v0.1 and https://github.com/apache/incubator-nemo/releases/tag/nemo-project-0.2. Release note for v0.1 introduces Nemo in general and its core conc

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-26 Thread John Youngseok Yang
Thank you Gyewon. Can you please consult with the "Legal Affairs Committee JIRA space( https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LEGAL/issues)", as instructed on this page? https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#audience Thanks, John On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 7:29 PM Gyewon Lee wrote: > Hi, s

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-26 Thread Gyewon Lee
Hi, sorry for checking in late. I've listed the licences of Nemo dependencies and their compatibilities (Category A, B, X) with ASF policy. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JhO-vc2AvYTt4U0_fJHwJWNRm9rEaU0EzPpD29kmdZE/edit?usp=sharing Question marks indicate that I couldn't determine their

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-26 Thread John Youngseok Yang
Thanks Wonwook, that sounds great! John On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:18 PM 송원욱 wrote: > Hi, sorry for checking in late! > As far as I could check for CO50, the criteria is clearly documented on > the code of conduct, and the instructions are also given for how to > contribute and commit to the pro

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-26 Thread 송원욱
Hi, sorry for checking in late! As far as I could check for CO50, the criteria is clearly documented on the code of conduct, and the instructions are also given for how to contribute and commit to the project, on our GitHub. https://github.com/apache/incubator-nemo/blob/master/.github/CODE_OF_CO

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-25 Thread John Youngseok Yang
Thanks! Gyewon, Wonwook, Jeongyoon - Please let me know in case you don't have the time and want me to work on the mentioned issues. I'd be happy to help! It'd be great to complete the checklist. Thanks, John On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 5:47 AM Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Thanks for the update! > Look

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-23 Thread Byung-Gon Chun
Thanks for the update! Looks like we're moving towards graduation. Cheers, Gon On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:01 AM John Youngseok Yang wrote: > I have completed QU30 > The security guide is at https://nemo.apache.org/docs/security/ > > Best regards, > John > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:22 PM Tae

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-20 Thread John Youngseok Yang
I have completed QU30 The security guide is at https://nemo.apache.org/docs/security/ Best regards, John On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:22 PM Taegeon Um wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like that CS10 has already been resolved, since we maintain a > list of committers and PPMC members in our website: > ht

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-10-11 Thread Taegeon Um
Hi, It looks like that CS10 has already been resolved, since we maintain a list of committers and PPMC members in our website: http://nemo.apache.org/pages/team/ * Reference: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Asses

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-08-28 Thread Gyewon Lee
I guess LC30 is closely related to LC 20. I will take both LC20 and LC30. Best, Gyewon 2020년 8월 28일 (금) 오후 12:41, Gyewon Lee 님이 작성: > Hi, > > I want to take LC20. > > Best, > Gyewon > > 2020년 8월 28일 (금) 오후 12:33, John Youngseok Yang 님이 작성: > >> Thanks for volunteering, Jeongyoon and Taegeon! >>

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-08-27 Thread Gyewon Lee
Hi, I want to take LC20. Best, Gyewon 2020년 8월 28일 (금) 오후 12:33, John Youngseok Yang 님이 작성: > Thanks for volunteering, Jeongyoon and Taegeon! > Sorry for the late reply - I lost track of this thread. > > I'll also keep working on my part. > > Cheers. > John > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:11 A

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-08-27 Thread John Youngseok Yang
Thanks for volunteering, Jeongyoon and Taegeon! Sorry for the late reply - I lost track of this thread. I'll also keep working on my part. Cheers. John On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:11 AM Taegeon Um wrote: > Hi John, > > I’d like to take CS10. > > Thanks, > Taegeon > > > On 20 Jul 2020, at 6:22

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-08-27 Thread Taegeon Um
Hi John, I’d like to take CS10. Thanks, Taegeon > On 20 Jul 2020, at 6:22 PM, Jeongyoon Eo wrote: > > Hi John, > > I'd like to take QU40, checking the backward compatibility and > documentation on changes. > Thank you always for your support! > > Best regards, > Jeongyoon > > > 2020년 7월 2

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-07-20 Thread Jeongyoon Eo
Hi John, I'd like to take QU40, checking the backward compatibility and documentation on changes. Thank you always for your support! Best regards, Jeongyoon 2020년 7월 20일 (월) 오후 4:23, John Youngseok Yang 님이 작성: > Thanks Gon for your comment. > Yes, it seems that we can definitely improve on doc

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-07-20 Thread John Youngseok Yang
Thanks Gon for your comment. Yes, it seems that we can definitely improve on documentation, among other things. If there is no further comment. I guess we can proceed to work on the remaining issues in The Apache Project Maturity Model. I'll first work on QU30(security). Any other volunteers? Ther

Re: Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-07-10 Thread Byung-Gon Chun
Hi John, Thanks for initiating this discussion! The Apache Nemo project has been growing well. I think this is a perfect time to discuss the maturity of the project. Thanks for putting up a document to check the current status of the project. It looks like the project mostly needs to improve docu

Nemo and the Apache Maturity Model

2020-07-09 Thread John Youngseok Yang
Hi Nemoers, I thought it would be a good time to discuss the overall progress we are making to mature the project. While there can be many different ways to evaluate the maturity of a project, The Apache Project Maturity Model seems to provide a clear list of items we can act on. The Apache Projec