Thanks, closing.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 10:18, Michael Bien wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> -mbien
>
> On 03.12.22 11:06, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > We need one more PMC vote to release this and unlock the DEB and RPM
> > votes. I'm counting Eric's two as one! :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
>
+1 (binding)
-mbien
On 03.12.22 11:06, Neil C Smith wrote:
+1 (binding)
We need one more PMC vote to release this and unlock the DEB and RPM
votes. I'm counting Eric's two as one! :-)
Thanks,
Neil
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 13:15, Neil C Smith wrote:
This is our first voting candidate for
+1 (binding)
We need one more PMC vote to release this and unlock the DEB and RPM
votes. I'm counting Eric's two as one! :-)
Thanks,
Neil
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 13:15, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> This is our first voting candidate for NBPackage. There are separate
> votes for DEB and RPM
+1 (binding)
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Neil C Smith
Envoyé : mercredi 30 novembre 2022 14:15
À : dev
Objet : [VOTE] Release NBPackage 1.0-beta2
This is our first voting candidate for NBPackage. There are separate votes for
DEB and RPM packages of Apache NetBeans 16 built using
+1 (binding)
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Neil C Smith
Envoyé : mercredi 30 novembre 2022 14:15
À : dev
Objet : [VOTE] Release NBPackage 1.0-beta2
This is our first voting candidate for NBPackage. There are separate votes for
DEB and RPM packages of Apache NetBeans 16 built using
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 12:44, Eric Barboni wrote:
> Commit hash is the following 059417a5428c1265dac36f08cbe895134dab439b
OK, let's cancel and split this into multiple votes - will do 3
(NBPackage, DEB and RPM).
Thanks for the comment here - will add hash in to vote info.
> Will create a repo
Building package from /mnt/c/Users/
barboni/Downloads/nbpackage-1.0-beta2-bin/nbpackage-1.0-beta2/bin/apache-netbeans_16-1_all.
Exception
Null
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Neil C Smith
Envoyé : mercredi 30 novembre 2022 12:11
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release NBPackage
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 10:38, Eric Barboni wrote:
> Sorry this is vote thread pollution.
I thought about that, but inclined to disagree - this is a vote on one
thing (NBPackage) and various convenience binary artefacts deriving
from it.
Still, if you insist I'll split into two votes, one
Hi;.
Sorry this is vote thread pollution. I would suggest having nbpackage on it's
own repo too easy process, having release note , git tag ... for it that not
mix with pp3 synergy and others wiki related item.
I would happy to the migration if ok. It will ony delay by 24h(if I'm slow) the
