Re: pull request for NETBEANS-3380

Missed you, Ernie. Welcome back! --emi On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:15 AM Ernie Rael wrote: > > I did a pull request for simple bug with trivial fix. (there was some > magic between github/issue that I didn't notice before making some > changes to issue). > > Is it generally sufficient to leave it

pull request for NETBEANS-3380

I did a pull request for simple bug with trivial fix. (there was some magic between github/issue that I didn't notice before making some changes to issue). Is it generally sufficient to leave it like that? The issue is unassigned. Or to mention here, or ? -ernie

Re: google style guide support

Interesting. Will give it a look. On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:55 PM John McDonnell wrote: > Hi Walter, > > I threw together a basic plugin relatively quickly on GitHub for the > Google Code Style for Java: > https://github.com/mcdonnell-john/nb-google-java-code-formatter-plugin > > You can clone

Re: google style guide support

Hi Walter, I threw together a basic plugin relatively quickly on GitHub for the Google Code Style for Java: https://github.com/mcdonnell-john/nb-google-java-code-formatter-plugin You can clone it and build it from there, or the first version should be published to Maven Central and

maven plugins and portal

Hi, I'm going through the process of uploading an NB plugin to maven central. Is there any documentation and/or jira issues about spec/work to the IDE for setting up maven based plugins, or to the the plugin manager, or changes to the new plugin portal? A well crafted search for jira might

Re: Re: Clarify how to use locally built platform with maven

Don’t suppose any of this would help... https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-repositories.html Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com > On November 19, 2019 at 5:30:39 AM CST, Dmitry Avtonomov > wrote: > Hi Eric, > Nothing to be sorry about, but I didn't quite understand your

Re: [NETBEANS-3346] Upgrade asm to 5.2+

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 22:28, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > When you create your PR for 7.2, please close this one in favor of that: > PR#1620 has been merged now, which is great news! Is everyone happy that no changes are needed to the processjsannotations ant task - this was discussed in the

Re: Using git push --force

Hi, I'm the author of the PR in question. My intention of using `git rebase` was to make review easier by splitting the changes into two individually meaningful commits. It's less work to just push the individual commits, so I'm fine doing that as well of course. Regarding the rebase / merge

Re: Cloud Based NetBeans

I think many have mentioned some of the other online IDEs (search for best online ides for more) so will limit input in that... I recall at Code One this year one of the sessions I believe by the gluon folks talked about a way of porting existing (I believe jfx based) applications using some

Re: Clarify how to use locally built platform with maven

Hi Eric, Nothing to be sorry about, but I didn't quite understand your point. It does feel like you know much about the topic though. So imagine there's me, wanting to develop a NBP app with maven. How do I go about it without a reliable internet connection? Why is the scan only done on Central

RE: Clarify how to use locally built platform with maven

Hi, Sorry to insist but the wizard will not find your version of NetBeans. Because the scan is done on central only, not in the local repository. The reference version are taken from the following artefatct org.netbeans.cluster:platform. It doesn't scan the former bits.netbeans repo too. A