Hi all,
Some (e.g., Josh) have argued we should include the enterprise cluster in
the upcoming release to support Jakarta EE.
One point to realize here is that no development has been done in this area
and the functionality in GitHub right now is identical to that provided by
8.2 plugins.
Howeve
Hi again,
Just talked to infra. They indeed prefer to commit all the javadoc files
to git and then use the "asf-site" branch and gitpubsub. I'll keep you
posted on my findings and update Neil's confluence page with my findings.
Cheers,
Antonio
El 17/09/2018 a las 21:41, Geertjan Wielenga esc
Great, thanks for taking the initiative, Neil and Antonio.
Gj
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Antonio wrote:
> So shall we remove the bits.netbeans.org subdirectory at [1]?
>
> Neil suggests "incubator-netbeans-website-docs" as a repository for
> holding the javadoc files. I'm not sure we want
So shall we remove the bits.netbeans.org subdirectory at [1]?
Neil suggests "incubator-netbeans-website-docs" as a repository for
holding the javadoc files. I'm not sure we want to host these files in a
git repository, though. What does infra have to say? Maybe we could set
up a simple web dir
Hi all,
We're in the middle of a number of different activities at the moment.
1. A major achievement of the past month has been that we have finalized
the GitHub repo and now the structure is more manageable and more
organized, with modules in folders representing their clusters:
https://github
You're always going to have individual contributors from Oracle working on
Apache NetBeans, together with individual contributors from many other
organizations.
Note that Apache does not and never has worked with companies, always with
individual contributors.
Gj
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:36 P
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 3:11 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
> "Oracle has not abandoned NetBeans."
>
> ...even that I'd recommend to omit, since it sounds a lot to me like "A has
> not done B", which sounds exactly like "A has in fact done B but here I am
> to defend A and tell you that it has
If JavaHelp cannot be included, there'll be a replacement - hopefully
one with better formatting support. ;-)
However, currently I'm still using NB 8.2, so JavaHelp should work
easily ...
Kind regards
Peter
Am 17.09.18 um 12:48 schrieb Peter Steele:
I believe in some other emails it was
Thank You for the pointers! I must admit, I only looked for email in 2018.
Kind regards
Peter
Am 17.09.18 um 14:22 schrieb Neil C Smith:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 12:58, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Sorry, but cannot find such email here.
There are many - eg.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/db
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 14:12, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
> Sorry, what do you mean by 'a release version of the JavaDoc'? I.e., you
> could get the sources of the 9.0 release and produce the javadoc from there
> and you'd have the release version of the javadoc, wouldn't you?
>
It says it's the d
Sorry, what do you mean by 'a release version of the JavaDoc'? I.e., you
could get the sources of the 9.0 release and produce the javadoc from there
and you'd have the release version of the javadoc, wouldn't you?
Gj
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 15:22, Neil C Smith wrote:
> ... and speaking of which, I have a branch of NB90 checked out, but
> what's the magic invocation required to make a release version of the
> JavaDoc?
I put up the wiki page requested -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Javado
Hi
JavaHelp itself is GPL, so it can't be included in the Apache Repo.
AFAIR Jarda said that Oracle may relicense the sources to a more Apache
friendly one. I am looking forward for a solution, too.
Jens
Am 17.09.2018 um 13:58 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld:
Sorry, but cannot find such email here.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 12:58, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>
> Sorry, but cannot find such email here.
There are many - eg.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dbb35a7ad04b7cd7437f2445f6a419d2cdc1dc0fc151c97d02243fae@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
and also on the wiki - eg.
https://cwiki.apache.org/co
Sorry, but cannot find such email here.
Am 17.09.18 um 12:48 schrieb Peter Steele:
I believe in some other emails it was mentioned java help couldn't be
included due to license issues.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:41 Peter Nabbefeld, wrote:
After some changes (mainly in folder structure) which se
I believe in some other emails it was mentioned java help couldn't be
included due to license issues.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:41 Peter Nabbefeld, wrote:
> After some changes (mainly in folder structure) which seemed to be
> necessary, help seems even not to be recognized.
>
> - P.
>
>
> Am 13.09.
After some changes (mainly in folder structure) which seemed to be
necessary, help seems even not to be recognized.
- P.
Am 13.09.18 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld:
Hello,
I want to create some NetBeans Javahelp providing module, but I cannot
find out, how. It seems, the problem arises f
Just one point from the web site:
"To this end, we have set up developer rooms (devrooms) with
network/internet connectivity and projectors where teams can meet and
showcase their projects. Devrooms are a place for teams to discuss, hack
and publicly present latest directions, lightning talks,
18 matches
Mail list logo
